The Tetragrammaton Deception
(Editor’s note: This presentation sometimes uses Esau and Edom interchangeably with Jewry, which can be accurate or misleading depending on the seedline. The author argues that Persian and Byzantine Jews [Canaanites] from Shelah intermingled with Edomite Turks during and after the Khazarian Empire, infusing Canaanite Jewry with Turk blood. This mixture led to the emergence of the Ashkenazim, linking many Jews to Esau as “lesser brethren.” Additionally, Edomites mixed into “royal” houses, including the Byzantine, giving rise to Emperor Leo IV of the Khazar dynasty, a lineage that carried over to many European and English monarchs, from whom U.S. Presidents descend.)
Steven’s WordPress Blog (SWPB) rejects the pretended “personal names” of God derived from the tetragrammaton (YHWH)—or tetragram—for an abundance of reasons. “Jews” despise the name Jesus Christ yet have no issues with YHVH, damaging its trustworthiness. The Lord will potentially disregard people for promoting the names of false deities, making Yahwism a powerful deception the opposition employs to brainwash Christians into praising and worshiping idols.
Most “Jews” refuse to utter the tetragrammaton, partially because they don’t comprehend the vowels, but Jewry also exercises an extreme avoidance of the name YHWH to avoid blaspheming it. Unfortunately, many “Christians” repudiate the name of the Lord Jesus and supplant it with the ones Jewry created. Most follow their pastors’ teachings without thinking—the rest are intentional deceivers.
The Yahwist faction must cease spreading fallacies about the Savior’s name. One inaccuracy regarding the name Jesus: it derives from Zeus and the Latin term for pig. The allegation that Jesus originates from the word pig (sus in Latin) is pseudo-etymology—words in specific languages don’t mean something they do in another; sus means “pig” in Latin but doesn’t in English, and thus no “pig” is observable in the name Jesus, an English translation of Iesous. Iesus (Latin) and Iesous (Greek) only possess the final “s” at the end when grammar rules require it—when the grammatical rule is unnecessary, the Son’s name is Iesou in Greek and Iesu in Latin. English no longer applies the exact grammar rule—the archangel’s name always translates as Jesus in English rather than Jesu. All condemnations of the Greek, Latin, and English names of the Kinsman Redeemer have no scholarly documentation supporting them. Slanderers produced falsehoods about these names of the Deliverer and propagated them as Gospel Truth—next, the copycats learned what those with inadequate scholarship wrote about the name Jesus, assumed it a shocking revelation, and parroted this misinformation.
Resolving this divisive “sacred name” doctrine is the author’s intention—the New Testament (NT) contradictions (Act 4:10-12; Phil 2:9-11) and exclusions of YHWH in the Septuagint (LXX) already resolve it; nonetheless, others demand additional testimony. The NT authors quoted an LXX version without the tetragram—if by some slim possibility that theirs contained it, the scribes determined not to transliterate it. The Lord Jesus would have mentioned Yahweh if this name is so fundamental that everyone must vocalize it—the fact He didn’t is one piece of evidence out of several revealing YHWH as a hoax.
“Hebrew” names aren’t extra special and suitable for all languages; if those who worship YHWH—known as the Yahwists or Yahus—assume the Divine taught Moses a unique “personal name” that shouldn’t change in pronunciation and spelling across all dialects, they must determine which language the Lord communicated to Moses. Two sources claim Paleo-Hebrew—AKA Phoenician—emerged in the eleventh century BC; hence, the Jacobites couldn’t have spoken Paleo-Hebrew during the thirteenth century BC, when Moses breathed. Israel tarried in Egypt for centuries, so the children of Jacob used Egyptian hieroglyphics; therefore, no conjectures of the tetragrammaton in Phoenician should occur—that tongue only surfaced after the exodus (Exo 12:31-42).
Isaiah 7:14 “Therefore the Lord himself shall give you a sign; Behold, a virgin shall conceive, and bear a son, and shall call his name Immanuel [H6005].”
Matthew 1:23 “Behold, a virgin shall be with child, and shall bring forth a son, and they shall call his name Emmanuel [G1694], which being interpreted is, God with us.”
H1694. Emmanouel em-man-oo-ale’ of Hebrew origin (6005); God with us; Emmanuel, a name of Christ:–Emmanuel.
H6005. `Immanuw’el im-maw-noo-ale’ from 5973 and 410 with a pronominal suffix inserted; with us (is) God; Immanuel, a type name of Isaiah’s son:–Immanuel.
Matthew explained what Emmanuel means in Greek—his audience would probably not understand the Hebrew interpretation. Greek manuscripts include and interpret Jesus and Emmanuel, but the NT writers rightfully excluded Yahweh.
Yahwists don’t know how to articulate YHWH in Babylonian Hebrew (Aramaic) or Phoenician—a dead language with uncertain letter pronouncements. Assuming the Yahus attempt to utilize Paleo-Hebrew to pronounce the tetragrammaton, this dialect has a radically different alphabet than Aramaic, making it a stretch to believe these languages sounded the same. “Biblical Hebrew”—square-lettered Aramaic—came into use by the Judahites no sooner than 586 BC during the Babylonian captivity, and Phoenician wasn’t relevant during Moses’ time because it didn’t exist—or at least not in any standardized form. Those choosing to conjecture names based on the “Four Letters” (YHWH) should prove these tongues existed when God Almighty revealed His supposed Hebrew personal name.
No data reveals that Paleo-Hebrew or Aramaic-Chaldean prevailed when Jacob’s descendants dwelled in Egypt—inscriptions aren’t ancient enough to confirm it; hence, the supposedly holy Hebrew names are insignificant. The earliest recognized Paleo-Hebrew engraving is from the Ahiram sarcophagus, dated to the eleventh century BC, and Moses lived in the 13th or 14th century BC, introducing a 200-300 year gap between Moses’ time and the oldest Phoenician inscription. Moses didn’t learn a “divine” Paleo-Hebrew name in such bygone generations, nor did Jesus teach this name, meaning nobody must acknowledge it.
“Around 1200 BCE, at the beginning of the Iron Age, the Israelites, Phoenicians, Arameans and others began adopting and adapting the ‘Proto-Canaanite’ script. Scholars of Hebrew usually call this the ‘Paleo-Hebrew’ or ‘Old Hebrew’ script, although others call it ‘Phoenician’ … For the first couple of centuries of the Iron Age, the scripts used by Israelites, Phoenicians, Arameans etc. were practically identical, but eventually individual ‘national’ scribal traditions began taking hold. Even so, the differences are so small that it takes an expert to tell them apart, and since we really don’t have all that many inscriptions in any of these languages, it’s sometimes hard to tell if slight differences in the way a letter is written are really a matter of different national traditions, or simply of style and of the individual scribe or engraver … Following all of this, it seems reasonable to assume that whatever sacred Hebrew texts existed in the pre-exilic period (i.e. the Iron Age) were written in ‘Paleo-Hebrew’ or ‘Old Hebrew’ script. However, NO such texts have survived, except for two small silver amulets that were unearthed in Jerusalem and contain what looks like a form of a few verses from Numbers and Deuteronomy, and these are indeed in ‘Paleo/Old-Hebrew’ script.”[16]
The Ketef Hinnom unearthings—found southwest of the Old City of Jerusalem—comprise silver scrolls functioning as amulets and allegedly date to 587 BC, shortly preceding Jerusalem’s ruin by the Babylonians. That these artifacts contain quotes from Numbers and Deuteronomy is conjecture—they don’t have accurate biblical text, only similarities with phrases observed in a few scriptural verses. The inscriptions show the tetragram and appear to originate from the Old Testament (OT)—Israelis unrolled and interpreted them. Israelites who forsook the Lord had complete knowledge of their indecent activities and knew the God of Jacob-Israel; therefore, it wouldn’t be unusual if the children of Jacob borrowed passages from Scripture and applied them towards their “whoredom” with strange deities (1Ki 7:51, 15:15; 2Chr 24:7). These silver scrolls don’t include actual Scripture quotations, and the translations are suspect—guesses occur in brackets. The Hinnom discoveries only prove that Judah reverenced YHWH with some pagan talismans immediately predating their captivity.
During the time of Ahab and Jezebel, only seven thousand Israelites didn’t forsake the Lord (1Ki 19:18), and they still held a kingdom. King Ahab reigned until approximately 874 BC—his successors weren’t “good” but maintained the monarchy until around 722 BC with the Assyrian captivities, and at the final captivity dates, fewer than 7,000 Israelites didn’t celebrate verboten deities. The Almighty showed His patience with Israel’s idolatry by providing them more than a century after it became exceedingly corrupt to change their behavior and cease whoring after false gods. Immediately before the Babylonian captivity in 586 BC, Judahites who didn’t worship Baalim were also minuscule in number. The All-Powerful destroyed their kingdoms, carried them away captive, and killed many in warfare with their competitors because they supplanted Him with foreign divinities and committed heinous acts. These silver amulets unlikely refer to the God of Jacob if they originate directly before 586 BC, as the Lord provided Israel many years to repent—such benevolence would likewise extend to Judah, meaning the Judahites were far into the process of deterioration near their incarceration dates due to them abandoning God and replacing Him with imaginary abominations.
Judah placed the name of a Baal into expressions that seem scriptural—this phenomenon is noticeable in modern history with some New Testament translations, where the translators interpolate Yahweh throughout, even though the Greek manuscripts omit the tetragrammaton. Yahwists arrange this because they assume the Creator wanted His supposed name inserted into the NT, but these scholars don’t know God’s desires and commit errors by injecting YHWH into the text—the unholy “Four Letters” would remain in the Greek translations if the Lord wished to include it.
The supposed Ketef Hinnom I (KH1) inscription without supplemental words:
“YHW … the grea … the covenant and raciousness towards those who love and those who keep … the Eternal? … blessing more than any re and more than evil. For redemption is in him. For YHWH is our restorer rock. May YHWH bles you and protect you. YHWH make shine.”
Alleged KH1 inscription with words conjectured in brackets:
“[Top line(s) broken]
…] YHW …
[…]
the grea[t … who keeps]
the covenant and
[G]raciousness towards those who love [him] and (alt: [hi]m;)
those who keep [his commandments …
…].
the Eternal? […].
[the?] blessing more than any
[sna]re and more than Evil.
For redemption is in him.
For YHWH
is our restorer [and]
rock. May YHWH bles[s]
you and
[may he] keep you.
[May] YHWH make
[his face] shine …
[Bottom line(s) broken.]”[6]
The second quotation includes brackets where the translators placed entire words not found on the amulet into the translation.
Deuteronomy 5:10 “And shewing mercy unto thousands of them that love me and keep my commandments.”
Deuteronomy 7:9-10 “Know therefore that the Lord thy God, he is God, the faithful God, which keepeth covenant and mercy with them that love him and keep his commandments to a thousand generations; And repayeth them that hate him to their face, to destroy them: he will not be slack to him that hateth him, he will repay him to his face.”
These Bible verses correspond—to some extent—with the phrases observed on this silver scroll. The Old Testament was incomplete when these amulets came into existence; therefore, if these are biblical quotations—they aren’t precisely—they must originate from Deuteronomy or Exodus. Line number three isn’t decipherable, so why the translators inserted “the grea” into this line is unknown, and this alleged Scripture quotation excludes the word “thousands” and has “who keeps” and “his commandments” interpolated into the translation—these words don’t appear on the actual scrolls.
Glancing at the drawn versions of these scrolls, it appears the interpreters performed guesses at some letters. These translations are suspect since the world must trust Jews who deceive about everything from holocausts to their Chosen People status. Nothing substantial is ascertainable by looking at the ancient silver artifacts—Israelis couldn’t decipher them before utilizing advanced photographic technology, enabling them to understand the inscriptions. The English translation and deciphering of consonants are of “Jewish” origin.
The alleged KH1 inscription mentions “the covenant”—the Israelites regularly forsook their God to establish covenants with strange divinities, such as Baalberith (Jdg 8:33, 9:46).
H1170. Ba`al Briyth bah’-al ber-eeth’ from 1168 and 1285; Baal of (the) covenant; Baal-Berith, a special deity of the Shechemites:–Baal-berith.
H1285. briyth ber-eeth’ from 1262 (in the sense of cutting (like 1254)); a compact (because made by passing between pieces of flesh):–confederacy, (con-)feder(-ate), covenant, league.
Berith means “covenant,” and Baalberith denotes “lord/master of the covenant” or “lord/master who enters a covenant with his worshipers.” Baalberith’s alternate name is Elberith, the covenant-keeping god.
“And it came to pass when Gedeon was dead, that the children of Israel turned, and went a whoring after Baalim, and made for themselves a covenant with Baal that he should be their god.” – Judges 8:33, Brenton LXX
The Septuagint translates this as a covenant with “Baal,” which refers to any false deity; nevertheless, in Brenton’s LXX, Chapter IX mentions “Baalberith.” Israel turned so many times that covenants with fictitious deities were commonplace.
The supposed Ketef Hinnom II (KH2) inscription without supplemental words:
“-h/hu. May be blessed he/she by YHW the warrior/helper and the rebuker of vil: May bless you, YHWH, keep you. Make shine, YH H, His face you and grant you p ce.”
Alleged KH2 inscription with words guessed in brackets:
“[Top line(s) broken: For PN xxxx]
-h/hu. May be blessed h/sh-
-[e] by YHW[H,]
the warrior/helper and
the rebuker of
[E]vil: May bless you,
YHWH,
keep you.
Make shine, YH-
-[W]H, His face
[upon] you and g-
-rant you p-
-[ea]ce.
[Bottom line(s) broken.]”[6]
The assumed Bible verse this introduces:
Numbers 6:24-26 “The Lord bless thee, and keep thee: The Lord make his face shine upon thee, and be gracious unto thee: The Lord lift up his countenance upon thee, and give thee peace.”
Purportedly, this blessing from Numbers appears on both amulets, which isn’t a precise match with Scripture; however, some phrases display similarities. While these “scrolls” might appear as proof positive that the tetragram refers to the God of Jacob and confirms it an authentic “personal name” of the Almighty, evidence to contradict this assumption is plenteous. Hebrew manuscripts reveal the four consonants YHWH; moreover, these letters are visible on some suspect and ruined Greek Old Testament fragments, although the preponderances of all Greek texts don’t include the name Yahweh—including the entire New Testament. The Ketef Hinnom scrolls are invocations that glorify an alien deity—Jacob’s sons took blessings from their legitimate religion and modified them to accommodate the false divinities that supplanted the Divine Maker. Those scrolls date to near the Babylonian captivities, when the worship of strange gods was rampant—widespread idolatries provoked the Lord to destroy the kingdom of Judah around the purported time the Judahites created these amulets. It doesn’t come as a surprise the children of Israel venerated the profane “Four Letters,” as those fools “whored” after false deities—such as Yahweh.
Because no original Phoenician manuscripts survived, confirming the tetragrammaton lurked in those manuscripts is impossible. YHWH only appeared in known Old Testament scrolls circa 900-1000 AD with the “Jewish” Masoretic Text (MT); therefore, Yahus employ the Dead Sea Scrolls (DSS) as evidence that the Israelites scribed the tetragram into biblical texts. Those scrolls are actually of non-Israelite origin, and—determining the extent of the interpolations carried out by dishonest scribes who rewrote the OT when they translated the forever-lost Phoenician manuscripts into square-lettered Aramaic—is difficult.
G2962. kurios koo’-ree-os from kuros (supremacy); supreme in authority, i.e. (as noun) controller; by implication, Master (as a respectful title):– God, Lord, master, Sir.
The Greek word for Lord—Kurios—manifests in the Septuagint and New Testament manuscripts, replacing the tetragrammaton found throughout the “Jewish” MT. One definition of “name” (H8034 & G3686) in the Bible is “authority.”
H8034. shem shame a primitive word (perhaps rather from 7760 through the idea of definite and conspicuous position; Compare 8064); an appellation, as a mark or memorial of individuality; by implication honor, authority, character:–+ base, (in-)fame(-ous), named(-d), renown, report.
G3686. onoma on’-om-ah from a presumed derivative of the base of 1097 (compare 3685); a “name” (literally or figuratively) (authority, character):–called, (+ sur-)name(-d).
All guessed pronunciations derived from the tetragram aren’t Paleo-Hebrew names but Babylonian-Aramaic. God and Moses never communicated in Hebrew—Paleo or otherwise—when this presumed “sacred name” that requires guesswork to pronounce emerged; these languages didn’t exist in the thirteenth century BC. Paleo-Hebrew and “Modern” Hebrew—Aramaic in the square script—are tongues that share no relation; the Old/Proto “Hebrew” dialect is more accurately Paleo-Greek.
Christians shouldn’t accept those who persuade others to revere demonic names (Deu 13, 18:20)—the sloth from those tolerating the teachers who spread such egregious errors is evidence of blind men following the blind (Mat 15:14).
Romans 16:17-18 “Now I beseech you, brethren, mark them which cause divisions and offences contrary to the doctrine which ye have learned; and avoid [G1578] them. For they that are such serve not our Lord Jesus Christ, but their own belly; and by good words and fair speeches deceive the hearts of the simple.”
G1578. ekklino ek-klee’-no from 1537 and 2827; to deviate, i.e. (absolutely) to shun (literally or figuratively), or (relatively) to decline (from piety):–avoid, eschew, go out of the way.
Believers are to avoid these types rather than befriend and encourage them—not disassociating with those who teach God’s people to revere the names of fictional deities allows deceptions to prosper. Christians with the spirit of God will depart from the individuals who vocalize the names of spurious divinities—hearing strange tetragrammaton names becomes intolerable. Parrots don’t know better, but after proper investigations, Yahus shall understand they make guesses to pronounce and comprehend the meaning of YHWH, and no guess names are legitimate.
Psalm 74:10 “O God, how long shall the adversary reproach? shall the enemy blaspheme thy name for ever?”
Yahwists misrepresent the Almighty’s name and make success impossible. Not all Yahweh lovers are malicious fraudsters or infiltrators, as some are under deceptive influences, but Yahus who refuse correction are suspects—once the falsehoods receive exposure and the liars and lemmings reject improvement, folks should steer clear of them. Agreements with untruths are unacceptable, so actions must transpire, and the readers of this treatise shall obtain ammunition to attack the deceivers—those embracing deceptions require humiliation for unity to develop.
Considering the ancient Israelites experienced subjugation for worshiping strange gods, His people won’t escape bondage by magnifying the names of false deities. Yahwists deceive others into idolizing the name of a fictitious deity, resulting in captivity—such Yahus share responsibility for national difficulties and afflictions, although they typically blame everything on “Jews.” These heretics remain efficient in circumventing the minds of many unsuspecting dupes.
Yahwism is antithetical to sane doctrines, so believers should separate from the offenders and attempt to inform them about such falsities. Many don’t appreciate the corrections, and few correct their alleged misunderstandings—the Yahus won’t listen and treasure falsehoods.
Philippians 2:9-11 “Wherefore God also hath highly exalted him, and given him a name which is above every name: That at the name of Jesus every knee should bow, of things in heaven, and things in earth, and things under the earth; And that every tongue should confess that Jesus Christ is Lord, to the glory of God the Father.”
Contrary to what Hebrewists allege, the Greek NT scrolls never had an original composition in Hebrew, and the name introduced in Philippians couldn’t be Yahweh—those manuscripts lack the tetragram.
Yahwists take simple passages from Philippians 2:9-11 and contrive weird interpretations, suggesting that believers will confess Yahushua is Yahawah (the sham names vary)—true Christians don’t require outlandish-sounding names. Israelites will concede Jesus Christ is Lord (supreme in authority)—there shall be one Lord and His name one (Zec 14:9). The faithful shall confess to what legitimate New Testament manuscripts record, which Yahus despise enough to distort Scripture and attempt legitimizing their shameful “sacred name” doctrines by transforming Philippians into nonsensical rubbish, with the word Lord missing—as always. Yahweh’s advocates apparently understand better than the NT authors and assume authority to alter the biblical text by embedding their contemptible names, which exposes their arrogance.
If YHWH was an appropriate name for God, and believers ought to worship conjectured names, the New Testament would teach this—it doesn’t, implying that Yahweh/Jehovah constitutes the name of a fictitious deity, and Yahwists utilizing the tetragram are dupes, delusional, or malevolent deceivers. The ones renouncing the name Jesus Christ of Nazareth are especially corrupt and blatant. Christians who value their credibility shouldn’t let Yahus deceive them into accepting despicable Yahwistic names; otherwise, folks shall praise a false god, which the Almighty abhors.
Acts 4:10-12 “Be it known unto you all, and to all the people of Israel, that by the name of Jesus Christ of Nazareth, whom ye crucified, whom God raised from the dead, even by him doth this man stand here before you whole. This is the stone which was set at nought of you builders, which is become the head of the corner. Neither is there salvation in any other: for there is none other name under heaven given among men, whereby we must be saved.”
H3068. Yhovah yeh-ho-vaw’ from 1961; (the) self-Existent or Eternal; Jehovah, Jewish national name of God:–Jehovah, the Lord. Compare 3050, 3069.
H3069. Yhovih yeh-ho-vee’ a variation of 3068 (used after 136, and pronounced by Jews as 430, in order to prevent the repetition of the same sound, since they elsewhere pronounce 3068 as 136):–God.
Y’hovah constitutes an opinion on what the correct tetragrammaton vowels are.
H1943. hovah ho-vaw’ another form for 1942; ruin:–mischief.
H1942. havvah hav-vaw’ from 1933 (in the sense of eagerly coveting and rushing upon; by implication, of falling); desire; also ruin:–calamity, iniquity, mischief, mischievous (thing), naughtiness, naughty, noisome, perverse thing, substance, very wickedness.
H1961. hayah haw-yaw a primitive root (Compare 1933); to exist, i.e. be or become, come to pass (always emphatic, and not a mere copula or auxiliary):–beacon, X altogether, be(-come), accomplished, committed, like), break, cause, come (to pass), do, faint, fall, + follow, happen, X have, last, pertain, quit (one-)self, require, X use.
Students might perceive at the Blue Letter Bible links that H1961 (HYH) appears similar to the tetragram; it includes three square Aramaic consonants seen in H3068—although not in exact order—but H1943 (HWH) has the precise initial three letters. Strong’s H3068 allegedly originates from H1961, but that’s from mere conjecture that “I AM THAT I AM” (Exo 3:14) has Yahwistic relevance. The assertion that YHWH stems from the Hebrew word hayah is misinformation; this fallible concordance should instead teach that the “Four Letters” are from HWH—one must append the final Aramaic consonant (י) to hovah to make it Y’hovah (juxtapose H3068 beside H1943). YHWH derives from HWH with a Y (Yod) attached; otherwise, the tetragrammaton would be YHYH. H1961 (hayah) is a common Aramaic word finding application in the Old Testament, but YHWH doesn’t derive from it—the Strong’s Concordance misleads by withholding the connections between YHWH and the word HWH.
Another HWH in Hebrew—H1933—means something different from ruin and carries the identical square Aramaic letters of H1943. Hebrew didn’t have vowel symbols until the Masoretes, and their Masoretic Text of 1000 AD—Yahus generate suppositions about the pronunciation of HWH unless they concur with the Masoretic vowel pointers for the verb H1933 (havah), which means “to perish,” “to fall,” “to desire,” and “to be, become, exist, happen.” The noun version of HWH (hovah) matches the vowels placed into the tetragram, but Yahwists assert YHWH includes the verb variant, although the Masoretes had divergent opinions—they probably understood their fictitious deity’s name better than most.
H1943 and H1933 are identical in appearance and only distinguishable by two distinct vowel pointers and the fact one’s a verb and the other a noun. Strong’s H1943 holds unflattering meanings, and H1933 can express something negative. God could easily pick a stronger name that wouldn’t generate ambiguities regarding its definition by not including the word HWH.
Many Yahwists don’t esteem what Jewish Hebrew experts pointed the tetragram to approximately a millennium ago, although Jewry was likely correct—“Yahweh” is ruinous (H1943) and filthy (H1942); no matter how one pronounces YHWH (H3068), it originates from the noun HWH, and hovah is another form of H1942 (havvah). The Masoretes had the option of excluding the “Four Letters” but decided on introducing it for unwitting sheep to stumble over. Jewish antichrists wouldn’t insert the Lord’s purported “personal name” into their translations if “Yahweh” was the God of Abraham—Jews are identity thieves and the adversaries of God, explaining their tetragrammaton injections. Mamzers had zero reasons to misrepresent YHWH by connecting it with H1943—the more devious action would exclude Yahweh altogether to blot the memory of the Almighty’s alleged name out. The New Testament discusses YHWH nowhere because it doesn’t belong—the tetragram only belongs in “Jewish” communities and inside the circles of those deceived by them, which includes a considerable portion of Christianity.
Yahovah, not Yahweh, seems more likely to be the correct spelling and pronunciation of the tetragrammaton—Yahus skip a vowel following the first H in YHWH. Yahwists speculate the vowels for HWH to give the Maker a Babylonian-Chaldean “name”—conjectures aside, they combine HWH with Y to produce YHWH, and thus all guess names derived from the “Four Letters” originate from HWH (H1943). Blue Letter Bible interprets hovah as ruin and disaster; Gesenius’ Hebrew-Chaldee Lexicon defines it as misfortune.
If one disbelieves the Masoretes about YHWH originating from H1943 (hovah), it would additionally be inaccurate to remove vowels from the verb form of HWH (havah); hence, Yahweh is an erroneous conjecture at a fictional deity’s name. Christ-hating Jews disseminated the tetragram with their Hebrew translations—they could have concealed YHWH if desired, yet chose to reveal the “Four Letters” to hoodwink those senseless enough to believe the Devil on Earth.
Comparatively to the Jewish Masoretic Text, the Dead Sea Scrolls include YHWH (transliterated in Paleo-Hebrew)—those manuscripts are a complete hoax dating no earlier than 1000 AD, with many texts appropriated from the Jewish El-Geniza Synagogue. Proof the DSS are a Jewish hoax dated to medieval times—and not the purported time of the early first century AD—resides in the comments section.
Exodus 20:2-3 “I am the Lord thy God, which have brought thee out of the land of Egypt, out of the house of bondage. Thou shalt have no other gods before me.”
One example from contemporary history of Paleo-Hebrew fakery comes from the “Shapira Strips”—forgeries a “Jewish” swindler named Moses Shapira passed off as ninth-century BC rarities and attempted to sell to a British Museum for one million pounds. The unusual “strips” comprised a spurious version of Deuteronomy written on parchments, which introduced an 11th commandment and contained the tetragram—Shapira’s tribesmen also interpolated YHWH into other manuscripts.
Yahus claim Jewry removed YHVH from the English Old Testament by replacing it with the appellation “LORD,” suggesting that Jews were originally honest by placing the “Four Letters” into the Hebrew manuscripts, but—sometime following 1000 AD—they became dishonest, and tetragram substitution occurred. Contrarily, the Lord wanted it translated into English as it was so His children wouldn’t vocalize false names in worship for generations. Utilization of Hebrew manuscripts to translate the OT occurs in most Bibles, although practically all translations apply the correct title—Lord.
Notwithstanding that hovah (HVH) has connections to all fanciful names derived from the tetragrammaton, some conjectured names contain what resemble other negative words:
H5753. `avah aw-vaw’ a primitive root; to crook, literally or figuratively (as follows):–do amiss, bow down, make crooked, commit iniquity, pervert, (do) perverse(-ly), trouble, X turn, do wickedly, do wrong.
H5773. `av`eh av-eh’ from 5753; perversity:–X perverse.
These words—“ahveh” and “ahvah” with the vowel after the initial H omitted—are hearable and observable in the common tetragram names Yahveh and Yahvah. Since removing this vowel seems erroneous, these names should be Yahaveh and Yahavah, which both incorporate the precise expressions of aveh (H5773) and avah (H5753), although these terms still arise—at least in pronunciation—with the vowel omission because the H in the Hebrew arrangements “ahveh” and “ahvah” are silent. Excluding the initial vowel in the Hebrew word HVH (H1943), hovah becomes hvah—an incorrect word rendition. Vowel-removing Yahus are incognizant that they mispronounce their fictitious god’s name and should correct their mistake if they refuse to acknowledge YHWH is a false deity—Yahweh’s foot-soldiers should at least correctly pronounce the name of their alleged god!
These audible words in multiple guesses are disturbing, although the tetragrammaton doesn’t derive from H5753 nor H5773—applying this weirdness as evidence of “evil names” isn’t scholarly.
No consonant W exists in Hebrew—why Yahus interchange the V in YHVH with W is unknown, other than the assumption that Vav had the pronunciation Waw long ago. No matter the correct letter, these words are indistinguishable—utilizing W makes hovah out as howah, with equivalent meanings, and a consonant determination makes YHWH/YHVH no less of a false deity, so entertaining Yahwists who argue over W’s and V’s is futile. Yahwist cults fight over the authentic articulation and spelling of the “Four Letters,” although their entire group persists in complete error. One contending faction might hold the “right” letter for the “superior” rendition of God’s alleged name; nevertheless, the tetragram represents a pseudo-deity. The Lord doesn’t possess weird names—those with the “correct” pronunciation of YHWH are deceivers.
YHWH is an apparent interpolation into either the Masoretic Text or original Aramaic manuscripts, composed by mongrels in Babylon circa 300 BC. Greek authors had divine inspiration to place Kurios (G2962)—an appellation rather than a “personal name”—into their manuscripts; conversely, Jewry had no authorization to inject the tetragrammaton into the Hebrew.
The Almighty wouldn’t select a “special name” associated with ambiguous terms to avoid confusion and skepticism concerning the name—God isn’t the author of confusion (1Cor 14:33). The Creator is too intelligent to choose “proper names” with connections to words that have evil meanings, even if the relationship is a misunderstanding of words.
H894. Babel baw-bel’ from 1101; confusion; Babel (i.e. Babylon), including Babylonia and the Babylonian empire:–Babel, Babylon.
Psalms 147:5 “Great is our Lord, and of great power: his understanding is infinite.”
The Lord would exercise His supreme intellect while choosing a “personal name” and select one that isn’t connectable to words like HWH (H1943) so people wouldn’t bring it into an argument. Self-respecting deities wouldn’t select strange-sounding names, like the abhorrent conjectures derived from the tetragrammaton—none would endure the torture of hearing such names as Yahuwah/Yahu when addressed, which don’t sound mighty but outlandish.
(Editor’s note: Corrections to an alleged error that the mystical “Four Letters” stem from H1943 are near the bottom of this manuscript. Why Masoretic scribes pointed YHWH to hovah if Yod [Y] prefixes applied with noun root words aren’t conventional Hebrew is uncertain. Some claim—without sufficient evidence—that the Masoretes adjusted the vowels for multiple reasons; however, any potential variation in interpreting YHWH still provides no validity to the assumption Yahweh is the personal name of the God of Israel. The tetragram originates from H1943 or H1933—the underlying root word doesn’t make a substantial difference.)
Yahus can’t formulate a universal “sacred name” everyone in their sect accepts—numerous conjectures exist because the “Four Letters” are Babylonian, which produces Yahwistic babel. The cult names come in varied forms, but all have foundations in babel originating from the tetragrammaton, possibly interpolated circa 300 BC in Old Babylonian-Aramaic manuscripts.
Exodus 3:13-15 “And Moses said unto God, Behold, when I come unto the children of Israel, and shall say unto them, The God of your fathers hath sent me unto you; and they shall say to me, What is his name [H8034]? what shall I say unto them? 14 And God said unto Moses, I Am [H1961] That I Am: and he said, Thus shalt thou say unto the children of Israel, I Am hath sent me unto you. 15 And God said moreover unto Moses, Thus shalt thou say unto the children of Israel, the Lord [H3068] God of your fathers, the God of Abraham, the God of Isaac, and the God of Jacob, hath sent me unto you: this is my name for ever, and this is my memorial unto all generations.”
Give concentration to where God proclaims a “name,” which isn’t in verse fourteen, where the “I am” statements appear, but instead in verse fifteen—no matter what verse 14 declared in the original biblical manuscripts, an authoritative declaration of His “name” never appears here.
Investigate H8034 and contemplate if Moses petitioned God’s authority/reputation/fame/memorial—“name” in Hebrew doesn’t automatically reference personal names. The Creator tells Moses to declare “I AM” (hayah in Aramaic) sent him—after saying whatever “I AM THAT I AM” expresses, the Maker commands Moses to reveal unto Israel that the Lord (Kurios) God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob sent him, declaring this His memorial “name” for all generations. Yahwists distort this into an imaginative “sacred name” fallacy by assuming the Divine presents His supposed “proper name” in verse fifteen via the interpolated tetragram and formulate conjectures that H1961—translated as “I AM” in verse fourteen—has Yahwistic connections. If Moses requested a “personal name,” the Lord’s “I am” response was possibly an admonition—He doesn’t require the strange “personal names” that false deities possess. In the corrupted Masoretic Text, Lord is Yahaveh, although the Greek Septuagint applies the correct appellation—Kurios.
Exodus 3:6 “Moreover he said, I am the God of thy father, the God of Abraham, the God of Isaac, and the God of Jacob. And Moses hid his face; for he was afraid to look upon God.”
The God of Jacob allegedly responded with “I am who I am” to Moses’ question about His name, and the Lord previously revealed who He was in Exodus 3:6. The Almighty didn’t respond with a “proper name” but elucidated His authority/fame/memorial—“I am who I am” could insinuate He is the God that Exodus 3:6 introduced beforehand.
“… I am The One Who Is. And he said, Thus shall you say to the sons of Israel, ‘The One Who Is has sent me to you.’ 15 And God said again to Moyses, Thus you shall say to the sons of Israel, ‘The Lord, the God of your fathers, God of Abraam and God of Isaak and God of Iakob, has sent me to you.’ This is an everlasting name of mine and a memorial of generations to generations.” – Exodus 3:14-15, NETS Septuagint
“… I am THE BEING; and he said, Thus shall ye say to the children of Israel, THE BEING has sent me to you. 15 And God said again to Moses, Thus shalt thou say to the sons of Israel, The Lord God of our fathers, the God of Abraam, and God of Isaac, and God of Jacob, has sent me to you: this is my name for ever ….” – Exodus 3:14-15, Brenton LXX
The conjectures change somewhat in different Septuagint translations—it doesn’t matter what “The One Who Is,” “THE BEING,” and “I Am Who I Am” express since His name remains recorded accurately in verse fifteen.
Psalm 20:1 “The Lord hear thee in the day of trouble; the name of the God of Jacob defend thee.”
This verse doesn’t mention weird “sacred” personal names, for the Father possesses no such thing, unlike the strange divinities—this Psalm would speak plainly about “Yahweh” defending folks if that was His actual “name,” but it isn’t talking about magical guess names. The Almighty’s identity and authority have nothing associated with confounding names that verbalizers must make assumptions about how to spell and pronounce.
God Almighty previously mentioned His identity in Exodus 3:6, and the Lord explains to Moses again who He is by proclaiming, “I am who I am.” If He is who He is, contemplate and describe who He is. (Hint: Exodus 3:6 contains the answer.)
Certain Yahus fabricate freaky names to appear “extra special” for vocalizing names most individuals don’t. The assertion that “I AM THAT I AM” is an additional “divine” name is incorrect—the phrase Ehyeh asher Ehyeh (“I am who I am”) and Yiddish expression Ehyeh (“I am”) hold no divine attributes. “Sacred name” conjectures are rubbish, like Satan, Michael the Archangel, Lucifer, the Antichrist, and other fictions occupying the brains of “Church” societies.
Psalm 44:20-21 “If we have forgotten the name of our God, or stretched out our hands to a strange god; Shall not God search this out? for he knoweth the secrets of the heart.”
God’s “names” aren’t strange Hebrew interpolations that deceivers trick others into uttering and thinking. The Father’s “name” is “the Lord God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob,” or “Lord” for short, and His son’s name is “the Lord Jesus Christ of Nazareth.” The Father and the Son are one (Jhn 10:30)—nobody comes to the Father except through the Son (Jhn 14:6). Lord, indicating kingship or sovereignty, is a title the Divine accepts—Christians invoke the God of Abraham and Jesus when mentioning the Lord.
Yahus sow discord and place new people under discordance every passing day. Propagators of “sacred name” falsehoods might resemble decent people; nonetheless, they spread deceptions, and perhaps the Lord afflicts them with delusions to mark them. Accepting correction and apologizing is difficult for Yahweh’s chosen—their haughtiness prohibits this, the Father already deluded them (2Th 2:10-12; Jer 7:16-18), or they comprise the Lord’s adversaries and lie intentionally.
Jeremiah 23:26-27 “How long shall this be in the heart of the prophets that prophesy lies? yea, they are prophets of the deceit of their own heart; Which think to cause my people to forget my name by their dreams which they tell every man to his neighbour, as their fathers have forgotten my name for Baal.”
Christians remained correct when vocalizing “Lord” throughout prior generations—tetragram acceptance only became widespread in contemporary history; Christendom wasn’t invoking a false Baal-deity by saying “Lord,” or national curses would have ensued instead of blessings. His shortened “name” (authority) is simply Lord—when believers desire to proclaim His complete name, the identifying information goes into the short form. Most have heard the innocent phrase, “Praise the Lord,” which praises Jesus Christ and the God of Isaac. The Israelites must confess Jesus of Nazareth as Lord (Phil 2:10-11)—our God is Lord of lords, and a time is coming when His name shall become one (Zec 14:9).
Yahwists who don’t spread falsehoods with intent stumbled upon extensive interpolations and swallowed “Jewish” toxins. Everybody consumed their poison in some form—their deceptions and vices are ubiquitous; however, YHWH is an exceedingly vile contagion.
H1168. Ba`al bah’-al the same as 1167; Baal, a Phoenician deity:–Baal, (plural) Baalim.
H1167. ba`al bah’-al from 1166; a master; hence, a husband, or (figuratively) owner (often used with another noun in modifications of this latter sense):–+ archer, + babbler, + bird, captain, chief man, + confederate, + have to do, + dreamer, those to whom it is due, + furious, those that are given to it, great, + hairy, he that hath it, have, + horseman, husband, lord, man, + married, master, person, + sworn, they of.
H1166. ba`al baw-al’ a primitive root; to be master; hence, (as denominative from 1167) to marry:–have dominion (over), be husband, marry(-ried, X wife).
Baal—a title humans and gods held—might mean “lord,” although it possesses no equivalence to H136 (Adonai). Lord—referring to sovereignty—is more accurately found with H113. Baal’s plural form is Baalim, and the Israelites worshiped diverse “Baalim.” (Jdg 3:7, 8:33, 10:6, 10; 1Sam 7:4, 12:10; 1Ki 18:18; 2Chr 28:2.) H1166 and H1167 materialize when addressing men rather than strange divinities.
Judges 3:7 “And the children of Israel did evil in the sight of the LORD, and forgat the LORD their God, and served Baalim [the “Baals”] and the groves [H842].”
Judges 8:33 “And it came to pass, as soon as Gideon was dead, that the children of Israel turned again, and went a whoring after Baalim, and made Baalberith their god.”
H842. ‘asherah ash-ay-raw’ or masheyrah {ash-ay-raw’}; from 833; happy; Asherah (or Astarte) a Phoenician goddess; also an image of the same:– grove. Compare 6253.
Gideon, an Israelite judge, delivered Israel from their adversaries—Following his death, Jacob’s sons embraced another Baal-deity named Baalberith. These deities possessed the title “Baal”—Israel never designated them “Lord” because they weren’t communicating in English, and Adonai/Kurios isn’t equivalent to the Canaanite term Baal.
H113. ‘adown aw-done’ or (shortened) adon {aw-done’}; from an unused root (meaning to rule); sovereign, i.e. controller (human or divine):–lord, master, owner.
Compare also names beginning with “Adoni-“.
H136. ‘Adonay ad-o-noy’ am emphatic form of 113; the Lord (used as a proper name of God only):–(my) Lord.
These Hebrew expressions can additionally mean “lord”—Strong’s H113 indicates sovereignty, and H136 (“the Lord”) is an emphatic form. H136 differs from the meaning of “Baal,” which can supposedly also mean lord; however, the Strong’s defines H1167 as master, husband, or owner. Visit the Blue Letter Bible (BLB) links for the three “baal” entries—H1166, H1167, and H1168—to see that “baal” is different from adown (H113) and finds frequent utilization for common words like “men” and “husband.” The King James translators never applied the word lord where “baal” resides in Hebrew manuscripts, although “lord” strangely manifests at BLB as the primary definition for H1168.
2 Kings 1:8 “And they answered him, He was an hairy man [H1167], and girt with a girdle of leather about his loins. And he said, It is Elijah the Tishbite.”
Even “Elijah” (Elias) was a “baal”—Strong’s H1167 is indistinguishable from H1168.
1 Kings 18:36 “And it came to pass at the time of the offering of the evening sacrifice, that Elijah the prophet came near, and said, Lord God of Abraham, Isaac, and of Israel, let it be known this day that thou art God in Israel, and that I am thy servant, and that I have done all these things at thy word.”
Elias remembered the Almighty’s memorial name and proclaimed it accurately in 1st Kings—the “full name” appears two additional times:
1 Chronicles 29:18 “O Lord God of Abraham, Isaac, and of Israel, our fathers, keep this for ever in the imagination of the thoughts of the heart of thy people, and prepare their heart unto thee.”
2 Chronicles 30:6 “Ye children of Israel, turn again unto the Lord God of Abraham, Isaac, and Israel, and he will return to the remnant of you.”
Hosea 2:16-17 “And it shall be at that day, saith the Lord, that thou shalt call me Ishi and shalt call me no more Baali [H1180]. For I will take away the names of Baalim out of her mouth, and they shall no more be remembered by their name.”
H1180. Ba`aliy bah-al-ee’ from 1167 with pron. suff.; my master; Baali, a symbolical name for Jehovah:–Baali.
Israelites hailed their God by the appellation Baal at some point—Jonathan had a son named Meribbaal (1Chr 8:34), and Saul’s son held the name Eshbaal (1Chr 9:39). During Ahab’s reign, “Baal” had associations with the false deities introduced into Samaria, making this title idolatrous. Hosea declares Baali shall no longer be an acceptable name for the Divine and the names of Baalim will cease from Israelite tongues—Merib-baal morphed into Mephi-bosheth and Esh-baal into Ish-bosheth (2Sam 2:10, 9:6). Jerubbaal was a name for Gideon in Judges 6:32 that developed into Jerub-besheth (2Sam 11:21). The words bosheth and besheth—meaning shame—replaced the theophoric appellation, baal, in various names.
H1322. bosheth bo’-sheth from 954; shame (the feeling and the condition, as well as its cause); by implication (specifically) an idol:–ashamed, confusion, + greatly, (put to) shame(-ful thing).
H378. ‘Iysh-Bosheth eesh-bo’-sheth from 376 and 1322; man of shame; Ish- Bosheth, a son of King Saul:–Ish-bosheth.
H4648. Mphiybosheth mef-ee-bo’-sheth or Mphibosheth {mef-ee-bo’-sheth}; probably from 6284 and 1322; dispeller of shame (i.e. of Baal); Mephibosheth, the name of two Israelites:–Mephibosheth.
2 Samuel 5:20 “And David came to Baalperazim, and David smote them there, and said, The Lord hath broken forth upon mine enemies before me, as the breach of waters. Therefore he called the name of that place Baalperazim [H1188].”
H1188. Ba`al P`ratsiym bah’-al per-aw-tseem’ from 1167 and the plural of 6556; possessor of breaches; Baal-Peratsim, a place in Palestine:–Baal- perazim.
David gave God credit for his accomplishment and allegedly named Baal-perazim after the Lord but selected the Canaanitish form, suggesting that Lord is the appropriate name—“Baal” was formerly a respectable title that became inappropriate after Jacob’s sons worshiped alien deities possessing such titles. Strong’s H136 (Adonai) is equivalent to the Greek word Kurios (G2962) and can denote what “Baal” does, although these words aren’t indistinguishable. The God of Israel was the Baal of Israelites, with an acceptable meaning—they applied this word innocently to reverence their Deity, yet the term became synonymous with strange divinities. Foreign nations surrounding Israel had their Baals, and the Israelites had theirs, which was once legitimately God Almighty. Baal essentially indicated the same thing as Lord—confusion between the God of Jacob and the fictitious gods of Canaan resulted in a ban on the name “Baal.”
“And David came from Upper Breaches, and smote the Philistines there: and David said, The Lord has destroyed the hostile Philistines before me, as water is dispersed; therefore the name of that place was called Over Breaches.” – II Samuel, Brenton LXX
The Septuagint translates this verse differently than the Masoretic Text, a rabbinical translation with excessive tetragram interpolations—no explanation is necessary for David naming places after Baal if one trusts the Greek, which doesn’t introduce Baal-perazim.
Strong’s H3069 claims “Jews” elsewhere pronounce H3068 (YHVH) as H136 (Adonai); however, H3068 and H3069 are malicious injections, and anywhere the MT utilizes them, the proper word should be H136. Determining what the Devil modified in their Hebrew versions is demanding—entire sentences are likely interpolations. The Septuagint isn’t infallible—it comprises translations of the Paleo-Hebrew into Greek by fallible men; nonetheless, the LXX is superior to the Masoretic Text. Biblical translations are the translators’ interpretations, which include bias and mistakes—Scripture goes through three or more translations before reaching English-speaking audiences. The initial translation comes from the non-extant Paleo-Hebrew manuscripts, which spawned the Aramaic and Greek; the second originates from scrolls copied from the original Greek and Aramaic manuscripts, which might contain additional interpolations and inaccuracies; and the third develops from those who translate the Aramaic and Greek into English.
Archaeology revealed YHWH with a goddess named ASHRTH—without vowel ascertainments—along with pagan symbolism. ASHRTH, allegedly Asherah and Athirat—both incorrect—was a female deity venerated by the Israelites and Judahites, and for clarification, the author appends the first vowel (A) for this goddess (ʾšrth).
The illustration above features a bull calf milking a cow. In the Iron Age (1200-1100 BC) and late Bronze Age (1560-1200 BC), the inhabitants of Canaan worshiped cast figurine bulls—bovines were Canaanitish fertility representations. Since Jacob’s progeny whored after the false god YHWH alongside ASHRTH, Baal was his probable title—idolaters often called their male deities by the appellation “Baal.”
Hosea 8:5-6 “Thy calf [H5695], O Samaria, hath cast thee off; mine anger is kindled against them: how long will it be ere they attain to innocency? For from Israel was it also: the workman made it; therefore it is not God: but the calf of Samaria shall be broken in pieces.”
H5695. `egel ay-ghel from the same as 5696; a (male) calf (as frisking round), especially one nearly grown (i.e. a steer):–bullock, calf.
Excavators uncovered three blessings pairing “Yahweh” with “Asherah” at the Kuntillet ‘Ajrud fortress, situated northeast of the Sinai Peninsula:
(1). “I have blessed you by Yahweh of Samaria and his a/Asherah.”
(2). “I bless you by Yahweh of Teman and by his a/Asherah.”
(3). “. . . give YHWH of Teman and his ASHERAH . . . YHWH of Teman and his ASHERAH favored.”[4]
Two Yahwistic ‘Ajrud blessings mention Teman—the name of an Edomic tribe and the designation of a region in Edom. (Amo 1:12; Oba 1:9; Eze 25:13; Jer 49:20, 49:7; 1Chr 1:45; Job 4:1, 15:1, 22:1.) One inscription mentions the whorehouse known as Samaria, the capital of the northern Israelite tribes, and Hosea mentions the calf of Samaria—the tetragram, along with forbidden graven images of divine bovines, have idolatrous Samarian connections.
1 Kings 12:28-29 “Whereupon the king [Jeroboam] took counsel, and made two calves of gold, and said unto them, It is too much for you to go up to Jerusalem: behold thy gods, O Israel, which brought thee up out of the land of Egypt. And he set the one in Bethel, and the other put he in Dan.”
Yahweh embodies the humanoid bull in the ‘Ajrud discovery—the other alien deity is the cow hominid next to YHWH. Jeroboam’s golden calves could be YHWH and ASHRTH, or Samaria’s calf might be another unique god—like the golden bull at Mount Horeb.
Asherah and Yahweh are the central characters in the drawing at Kuntillet ‘Ajrud, showing two humanoids with animalistic attributes—their arms interlock, indicating that the creatures are a couple; the petite rightmost figure has two circles near the breast section—that entity is the female consort of the other. The cult animal of Baal is the bull, symbolizing strength and fertility, and the beastly figures in these discoveries are cattle in hominid form—tails dangle between their limbs, their faces resemble bovines, and cattle are visible to the left. These entities are—without a doubt—humanoids in bull and cow forms. The Israelites wouldn’t employ anthropomorphism to represent the Maker unless the purported paganization of their religion made the God of Israel assume these abysmal forms—these depictions aren’t representations of the “Most High” but of a strange deity named “Yahweh” with his wife. The Israelites didn’t give their Deity the same characteristics as the Baalim by transforming Him into a bovine pimp with consorts—they “whored” after the Baals.
Deuteronomy 4:16-18 “Lest ye corrupt yourselves, and make you a graven image, the similitude of any figure, the likeness of male or female, The likeness of any beast that is on the earth ….”
Jeroboam reigned from 931 to 910 BC and was the king who caused Israel to sin, along with all succeeding Israelite kings. Comparing the ‘Ajrud drawings with Hosea 8:5-6, Jeroboam’s calves might be YHWH and ASHRTH—the bovine deities in archaeological finds. Two golden calves existed, and it was commonplace that the male divinities of the ancient world accompanied divine female consorts, as observed with ASHRTH. Ahab’s successor, Omri, governed from 884 to 873 BC and constructed Samaria as his capital—the calves of Jeroboam remained throughout Omri’s regime, making it unlikely the calf of Samaria was a new divinity.
A woman researched the ‘Ajrud data and wrote an essay on the Yahwistic links to “Asherah” (ASHRTH); SWPB doesn’t endorse this article—she presents her interpretations but offers disprovable conjectures. One flawed hypothesis is that those bovine bipeds portray the Egyptian gods Bes and his consort Beset before Bes transformed into a dwarf; those hominids demand proper identification as humanoid bovines representing YHWH and ASHRTH—their characteristics resemble cattle, and the male doesn’t have a mane. The woman’s pictures of Bes show manes; his face looks substantially different, and his body appears more muscular.
The only resemblances between the ‘Ajrud figures and these alleged Bes representations are that Bes resembles a lion in hominid form with a tail, and the leftmost Bes picture shows what might be feathers atop his head—those could be anything, including his hairstyle or a headdress; the two supplementary Bes images have no supposed “feathers.” The animalistic male humanoid in the portrayals at Kuntillet ‘Ajrud displays what resembles feathers on its head, a crown, or two horns and something else. Those two central figures aren’t deities from Egypt; otherwise, the engravers would reference the names Bes and Beset—the inscriptions include the names YHWH and ASHRTH because that’s who those anthropomorphic entities represent. The Bes and Beset connection with Kuntillet ‘Ajrud is dangerous misinformation, which contradicts the indisputable fact that those bovines are the fictitious gods Yahweh and AShRTh.
A goddess combined with a male deity was customary in ancient civilizations—the Bes and Beset twosome features one example. Jeroboam’s golden calves—represented as two different gods—make it plausible they constituted a male and female. Assuming the ‘Ajrud inscriptions include the names of these calves, the female deity is ASHRTH, and the male is YHWH.
Plenty of conjecture formulates her articles, but what stands out about them are the Paleo-Hebrew translations—she asserts the correct translation is “by Yahweh and by Asherah” and not “by Yahweh and his asherah,” which appears accurate. However, the proper rendition for ASHRTH isn’t “Asherah” since it incorporates the consonant T—asherah is (A)SHRH in Hebrew minus the vowels. Vowel pointers for Hebrew didn’t exist, and speculations surround the pronunciations. Performing vowel guesses following the “Ash” prefix is the conventional approach to speculate the articulation of ASHRTH, making “Ash[?]r[?]t[?]h” with the question marks in brackets represent an assumption at the correct vowels; with rules bent, “ASHtoReTH” presents a compelling guess. If the vowel guessing games allow for such flexibility to exclude vowels in names like “Yahveh” (Yahaveh), ASHRTH can almost translate as “Ashtoreth,” the name of a goddess the Bible mentions (1Ki 11:5, 11:33; 2Ki 23:13); nevertheless, ASHRTH would miss one T, as (A)SHTRTH represents “Ashtoreth” without vowel conjectures, which makes it appear like an inaccurate guess.
Some allege “Ash-toreth” is a distortion like bosheth, which replaced the word “Baal” in personal names—it wouldn’t be shocking if toreth is also a falsification. Scripture mentions Ashtoreth, Kemosh, and Milcom (Molek) in the books of Kings, so it seems unusual that scribes distorted Ashtoreth’s name only, yet to assume Baal’s counterpart had her name modified is reasonable.
The false gods Kemosh and Yahweh surface on the Moabite Stone, which Mesha, king of Moab, produced following the regime of an Israelite king named Omri, the father of Ahab—this stone mentions the Moabites slaughtering Israelite men, women, and children in sacrificial assaults devoted to Kemosh and declares that Moab’s chieftain seized the “vessels of YHWH.” Any “vessels” Mesha plundered belonged to an imaginary deity the Israelites venerated—the Lord permitted the Moabites to achieve military victories due to Israel’s Baal-worshiping tendencies. Another problem with these “vessels” belonging to the God of Isaac is that Jeremias and Daniel claim the Babylonians took these vessels when carrying Judah into captivity (Jer 27:16, 28:3, 6; Dan 1:2).
Deuteronomy 32:17 “They sacrificed unto devils, not to God; to gods whom they knew not, to new gods that came newly up, whom your fathers feared not.”
The Mesha Stele, which existed after Israel “whored” after mythical gods and goddesses—except for small pockets during Ahab’s reign—provides the oldest official tetragrammaton. Ahab’s successors were corrupt kings who accelerated the destruction of the northern Israelite tribes until it ended around 722 BC with the Assyrian captivities. Mesha slaughtered Yahweh worshipers—he obtained YHWH’s “vessels” from Nebo and placed them together with the vessels of Kemosh. Unsurprisingly, the Almighty didn’t protect Israel from Kemosh—the Lord even contemplated destroying His people while they celebrated a golden bull-calf as the God who delivered them from their Egyptian oppressors (Exo 32:8-14).
2 Kings 3:4-5 “And Mesha king of Moab was a sheepmaster, and rendered unto the king of Israel an hundred thousand lambs, and an hundred thousand rams, with the wool. But it came to pass, when Ahab was dead, that the king of Moab rebelled against the king of Israel.”
These inscriptions reveal that the Moabites massacred thousands of Yahwists—like the Assyrians and Babylonians. It seems those Yahus got what they had coming to them:
“I am Mesha, son of KMSYT (Kemosh[-yat]), the king of Moab, the Dibonite. My father was king of Moab thirty years, and I reigned after my father. And I built this high-place for Kemosh in QRH (‘the citadel’), a high place of [sal]vation because he saved me from all the kings (or ‘all the attackers’), and because let me be victorious over all my adversaries. Omri was king of Israel and he oppressed Moab for many days because Kemosh was angry with his land. And his son replaced him; and he also said, ‘I will oppress Moab’. In my days he spoke thus. But I was victorious over him and his house. And Israel suffered everlasting destruction, And Omri had conquered the land of Madaba, and he dwelt there during his reign and half the reign of his son, forty years. But Kemosh returned it in my days. So I [re]built Baal Meon, and the water reservoir in it. And I bu[ilt] Qiryaten. The man of Gad had dwelt in Ataroth from of old; and the king of Israel built Ataroth for him. But I fought against the city and took it. And I slew all the people [and] the city became the property of Kemosh and Moab. And I carried from there the altar for its DVDH (‘its Davidic altar’?) and I dragged it before Kemosh in Qerioit, and I settled in it men of Sharon m[en] of Maharit. And Kemosh said to me, ‘Go! Seize Nebo against Israel.’ so I proceeded by night and fought with it from the crack of dawn to midday, and I took it and I slew all of them: seven thousand men and boys, and women and girls and maidens because I had dedicated it to Ashtar Kemosh. I took [the ves]sels of Yahweh, and I dragged them before Kemosh. And the king of Israel had built Yahaz, and he dwelt in it while he was fighting with me, but Kemosh drove him out before me. so I took from Moab two hundred men, all his captains. And I brought them to Yahaz, And I seized it in order to add (it) to Dibon.”[5]
An entire city named Ataroth suffered consumption—from there, Mesha looted an altar with connections to King David and dragged it before Kemosh. Next, a tetragram cult in Nebo experienced destruction—adults and adolescents alike met their doom, with an alleged body count of seven thousand Yahweh lovers. Nebo had an infestation of Yahus because, from there, Mesha snagged the vessels of YHWH and delivered them to Kemosh—Nebo’s god, Yahweh, was no competition for the mighty Kemosh, and Yahweh’s vessels became the property of Kemosh and Moab.
The lesson of this story: People shouldn’t whore after YHWH—overcoming Kemosh requires a deity more potent than that dung god!
Joshua 24:20 “If ye forsake the Lord, and serve strange gods, then he will turn and do you hurt, and consume you, after that he hath done you good.”
In the battle of the gods, Kemosh is the unequivocal champion—bull-gods can’t easily defeat such powerhouses, especially the kind that scatters their dung around and chooses sluts like ASHRTH as their consort.
To even the score, the Moabites experience their terror in return.
Lamentations 1:22 “Let all their wickedness come before thee; and do unto them, as thou hast done unto me for all my transgressions: for my sighs are many, and my heart is faint.”
The Lord always destroys those that He uses to chastise His people (Jer 30:11, 46:28)—here, God’s judgment is Moab’s genocide, including their “little ones”:
Jeremiah 48:14 “Against Moab thus saith the Lord of hosts, the God of Israel; Woe unto Nebo! for it is spoiled: Kiriathaim is confounded and taken: Misgab is confounded and dismayed. There shall be no more praise of Moab: in Heshbon they have devised evil against it; come, and let us cut it off from being a nation. Also thou shalt be cut down, O Madmen; the sword shall pursue thee. A voice of crying shall be from Horonaim, spoiling and great destruction. Moab is destroyed; her little ones have caused a cry to be heard.”
Amaziah—a Judahite king—reigned from 796 to 767 BC and initially performed well:
2 Chronicles 25:11-12 “And Amaziah strengthened himself, and led forth his people, and went to the valley of salt, and smote of the children of Seir [Edom] ten thousand. And other ten thousand left alive did the children of Judah carry away captive, and brought them unto the top of the rock, and cast them down from the top of the rock, that they all were broken in pieces.”
This sovereign’s military slaughtered ten thousand Edomites—after the conflict, Amaziah briefly brought the remaining Esauites into confinement, which was sufficient time to lead them atop a high rock, where they crashed down to the rocks below, resulting in thousands of additional dead Edomites and many broken bones. This king shows competence, but after slaughtering twenty-thousand Esaurians, he commits a criminal act by importing their gods into Judah’s territory:
2 Chronicles 25:14-15 “Now it came to pass, after that Amaziah was come from the slaughter of the Edomites, that he brought the gods of the children of Seir, and set them up to be his gods, and bowed down himself before them, and burned incense unto them. Wherefore the anger of the Lord was kindled against Amaziah, and he sent unto him a prophet, which said unto him, Why hast thou sought after the gods of the people, which could not deliver their own people out of thine hand?”
2 Chronicles 25:20 “But Amaziah would not hear; for it came of God, that he might deliver them into the hand of their enemies, because they sought after the gods of Edom.”
This anonymous prophet asked an appropriate question—“Yahweh” couldn’t protect the Israelites from Mesha, just as the gods Amaziah obtained from Edom didn’t save the Edomites from Amaziah’s fierceness. Why have Yahwists sought after the god of the people, which couldn’t deliver them out of Mesha’s hand? Perhaps YHWH of Teman is among the deities that Amaziah imported from Mount Seir.
Asheratah is another rendition of ASHRTH—some claim when “Asheratah” translates from Phoenician, the possessive pronoun drops and becomes Asherah, which sounds like rubbish; others allege “Asheratah” is an archaic form of “Asherah.” An additional goddess in Scripture—who might not be identical to ASHRTH—has the designation Ashtoreth and Ashtaroth, and both are indistinguishable; taroth is the plural of toreth. Toreth, as a distortion, would mean that scribes censored the original name of this divinity by putting replacement words into her name, as with the word bosheth. A vowel omitted between the T and H in ASHRTH creates further possibilities for the name, with Asheroth and Asharoth as possible suppositions.
AShRTh—as the same divinity paired with Baal in the Old Testament (Jdg 2:13, 10:6)—indicates YHWH was a strange deity. Several deities in the ancient world possessed names commencing with the letter A, with differing names in contrasting cultures; moreover, many goddesses held the title “Queen of Heaven,” making it confusing to pinpoint any particular goddess. “The asherah” (H842) mentioned in the Bible are groves or objects associated with goddesses like ASHRTH and not an alleged deity named “Asherah.”
“Baal” emerges amongst the names in the ‘Ajrud inscriptions, which could refer to anyone—including Yahweh—because Baal was an appellation of humans and gods alike. It appears deliberate attempts to mistranslate the engravings occurred by interpreting them “and his [YHWH’s] asherah,” when they should unmistakably have the translation “and by [uppercase goddess].” Dishonest translators desired to protect the tetragram by obfuscating evidence that Yahweh received worship alongside a female divinity—as the Baalim did—and therefore associated YHWH with an “asherah” to conceal this goddess. This divinity is presumably the “Queen of Heaven” in Jeremias—it could additionally be the idol accompanying Baal elsewhere in Scripture, which would be more damning evidence suggesting that “Yahweh” is one of the Baalim.
No divinity named Asherah existed, although scholars identify “Asherah” as Athirat from the Ugaritic texts, which originated before 1200 BC. The mythology those discoveries introduce makes “Athirat” the mother goddess, having seventy divine descendants, and she was the consort of a fictitious El—the problem is that the gods and goddesses in various localities weren’t invariably the same. Many societies borrowed characteristics from the deities of foreign populations and applied them to theirs, indicating a high conceivability that Israel invented unique idols (Psa 106:39) or modified the divinities of alien nations.
Contrary to what scholars maintain, Ugaritic mythologies don’t share any correlation with the make-believe divinities Jacob’s sons invented or obtained from their neighbors; hence, the connection between Athirat and Asherah is inadequate—the “asherah” are objects or groves. Athirat was the queen of her pantheon, and some speculate she was the “Queen of Heaven” in Jeremias Chapter VII, which mentions “other gods” alongside this queen that the Israelites worshiped (Jer 7:16-18). Yahweh appears at least twice with Ashtoreth in archaeological data, and each male deity potentially had a consort categorized as the “Queen of Heaven.”
Strange deities—including many Baalim and idols from Egypt and Syria—had bovine appearances. In Canaanitish mythology, thunderclouds had the designation Hadad’s Calves, and Baal-Hadad—a divinity of storms and rainfall—would transform into a bull to impregnate his consort, who metamorphosed into a cow to birth a bull-calf. The Creator manifested at Mount Horeb in terrible storm clouds bursting with thunder and lightning—following these thundercloud manifestations, the Israelites went to Aaron and demanded new gods, as Moses was missing (Exo 32:1-16). Accordingly, Aaron created a golden bull-calf, so perhaps the Israelites made Hadad their god or some different storm deity—even a unique god they invented.
The bull-deity named Yahweh, shown in hominid form adjacent from his divine bovine consort, isn’t the God of Israel—don’t let the Yahwists continue this farce, and stop writing and pronouncing the tetragrammaton.
Exodus 32:8-14 “They have turned aside quickly out of the way which I commanded them: they have made them a molten calf, and have worshipped it, and have sacrificed thereunto, and said, These be thy gods, O Israel, which have brought thee up out of the land of Egypt. And the Lord said unto Moses, I have seen this people, and, behold, it is a stiffnecked people: Now therefore let me alone, that my wrath may wax hot against them, and that I may consume them: and I will make of thee a great nation. And Moses besought the Lord his God, and said, Lord, why doth thy wrath wax hot against thy people, which thou hast brought forth out of the land of Egypt with great power, and with a mighty hand? Wherefore should the Egyptians speak, and say, For mischief did he bring them out, to slay them in the mountains, and to consume them from the face of the earth? Turn from thy fierce wrath, and repent of this evil against thy people. Remember Abraham, Isaac, and Israel, thy servants, to whom thou swarest by thine own self, and saidst unto them, I will multiply your seed as the stars of heaven, and all this land that I have spoken of will I give unto your seed, and they shall inherit it for ever. And the Lord repented of the evil which he thought to do unto his people.”
Moses convinced the Lord to allow His people to continue breathing, although not without punishment:
Exodus 32:27-28 “And he said unto them, Thus saith the Lord God of Israel, Put every man his sword by his side, and go in and out from gate to gate throughout the camp, and slay every man his brother, and every man his companion, and every man his neighbour. And the children of Levi did according to the word of Moses: and there fell of the people that day about three thousand men.”
Moses’ smooth-talking caused a mere 3,000 Jacobites to perish in this golden calf incident—a conceivable form of ancient “Yahweh” worship. An unknown amount endured in Ataroth and Yahaz, and Nebo allegedly suffered seven thousand fatalities for their YHWH worship—the Assyrians and Babylonians annihilated even larger quantities when capturing the Yahus infesting the kingdoms of Judah and Israel and destroying their cities. A-taroth and Yah-az show similarities with the names of the alien divinities Ash-taroth and Yah-weh—Scripture mentions consumption (Jos 24:20) as the punishment for worshiping false gods, and the Moabites consumed these cities named after strange deities. Nebo—presumably the keeping grounds for the “vessels of YHWH”—encountered the sword along with Ataroth and Yahaz. Israelites inhabited Yahaz, Ataroth, and Nebo, which all had connections to the fictitious gods YHWH and ASHTRTH, and the Almighty’s retribution came upon them via Mesha’s hand—such devastations wouldn’t happen without cause, as God is reasonable. Even after these catastrophes, Israel never learned their lesson; consequently, the Lord ended their kingdoms and brought whoever survived the Babylonian and Assyrian invasions into captivity.
Israel and Judah apparently repudiated the name of Edom’s sacred bull after the captivities—discoveries only link Jacob’s sons with the tetragram during their whoredom with strange deities in mass numbers, but the “whores” discarded this unsacred “name” after their involvement with the bull god YHWH and cow goddess AShRTh ended their kingdoms.
Deuteronomy 7:1-5 “When the Lord thy God shall bring thee into the land whither thou goest to possess it, and hath cast out many nations before thee, the Hittites, and the Girgashites, and the Amorites, and the Canaanites, and the Perizzites, and the Hivites, and the Jebusites, seven nations greater and mightier than thou; And when the Lord thy God shall deliver them before thee; thou shalt smite them, and utterly destroy them; thou shalt make no covenant with them, nor shew mercy unto them: Neither shalt thou make marriages with them; thy daughter thou shalt not give unto his son, nor his daughter shalt thou take unto thy son. For they will turn away thy son from following me, that they may serve other gods: so will the anger of the Lord be kindled against you, and destroy thee suddenly. But thus shall ye deal with them; ye shall destroy their altars, and break down their images, and cut down their groves, and burn their graven images with fire.”
Deuteronomy 7:5 instructs to eradicate the groves (asherahs) of the alien goyim after advancing into the Promised Land. The “Asherah” monkey business wasn’t happening with Israel preceding their campaign into Canaan; following their entrance, disobedient Israelites whored after goddesses with groves (H842).
Deuteronomy 12:3 “And ye shall overthrow their altars, and break their pillars, and burn their groves with fire; and ye shall hew down the graven images of their gods, and destroy the names of them out of that place.”
Deuteronomy 16:21 “Thou shalt not plant thee a grove [H842] of any trees [H6086] near unto the altar of the Lord thy God, which thou shalt make thee.”
H6086. `ets ates from 6095; a tree (from its firmness); hence, wood (plural sticks):–+ carpenter, gallows, helve, + pine, plank, staff, stalk, stick, stock, timber, tree, wood.
The Lord not only commanded the children of Israel to destroy the Canaanite asherahs but to not plant an “asherah” (grove) of trees (H6086) near His altars; the foolish Israelites disobeyed the Lord—as usual—and in doing so, failed in annihilating Canaan’s population, which seduced them into the asherah and Baalim hanky-panky, and left behind many “pricks” (Num 33:55).
Psalm 106:34-48 “They did not destroy the nations, concerning whom the Lord commanded them: But were mingled among the heathen, and learned their works. And they served their idols: which were a snare unto them. Yea, they sacrificed their sons and their daughters unto devils, And shed innocent blood, even the blood of their sons and of their daughters, whom they sacrificed unto the idols of Canaan: and the land was polluted with blood. Thus were they defiled with their own works, and went a whoring with their own inventions. Therefore was the wrath of the Lord kindled against his people, insomuch that he abhorred his own inheritance. And he gave them into the hand of the heathen; and they that hated them ruled over them. Their enemies also oppressed them, and they were brought into subjection under their hand. Many times did he deliver them; but they provoked him with their counsel, and were brought low for their iniquity. Nevertheless he regarded their affliction, when he heard their cry: And he remembered for them his covenant, and repented according to the multitude of his mercies. He made them also to be pitied of all those that carried them captives. Save us, O Lord our God, and gather us from among the heathen, to give thanks unto thy holy name, and to triumph in thy praise. Blessed be the Lord God of Israel from everlasting to everlasting: and let all the people say, Amen. Praise ye the Lord.”
Baalim (plural) and the asherah intertwine—Holy Writ never elucidates the identities of the Baalim and goddesses of the groves, except for references to Baalberith and Ashtoreth (ASHTRTH). OT manuscripts omitted ASHRTH—a confirmed goddess the Israelites, Judahites, and Temanites worshiped—if that isn’t “Ashtoreth.” Qos (Kaush)—a supposed Edomic deity—appears in archaeological records without incorporation into the Bible; however, Edomites weren’t monotheistic, and thus Yahweh was another god they celebrated. Some “gods” made it into Scripture without generic titles nor distorted names, while others had no scriptural inclusion, even if Jacob’s sons venerated them—the Good Book usually mentions these deities generically as “strange gods,” Baalim and Ashtaroth.
Baal and the groves appear in Judges 3:7, and I Kings 18:19 mentions 450 prophets of Baal with 400 of “the asherah.” Unearthings that introduce an Ash-prefixed goddess traced to Israel show those idol-worshiping pagans spelled her name ASHRTH, and she was YHWH’s consort, as the data confirms—the principal Baal during their ASHRTH worship, was YHWH, the husband of this so-called goddess. The rendition of these consonants as “Asheratah”—or something comparable—would be more fitting; the T in ASHRTH makes “Asherah” impossible. ASHRTH—Asheratah/Asheroth/whoever—is the actual designation of these divinities in ancient inscriptions, and the (A)SHRH (“asherah”) are their groves. One could spend hours hypothesizing the vowels of ASHRTH—that isn’t important, and uppercase letters to specify these goddesses are satisfactory.
Multiple discoveries link Yahwistic idolatries with the incarcerations of Israelites and Judahites—apart from the ‘Ajrud findings, evidence arose from eighteen clay sherds dating to 588 BC that archaeologists uncovered in Lachish, a city in Judah. Hoshaiah, a military commander at Lachish or Mareshah, wrote the letters—employing the Paleo-Hebrew language and tetragrammaton—to a man named Yaush.
Letter number two reads:
“To my lord, Yaush, may YHWH cause my lord to hear tiding(s) of peace today, this very day! Who is your servant, a dog, that my lord remembered his [se]rvant? May YHWH make known(?) to my [lor]d a matter of which you do not know.”[1]
Peace wasn’t on the table—the tribes of Jacob went “whoring” after strange deities, culminating in the Assyrian and Babylonian captivities; hence, Nebuchadnezzar proceeded to Azekah and Lachish, the last Judahite cities conquered by the Babylonians. The first displaced tribes were the northern Israelites around 740 BC—Lachish was among the final cities of Judah to experience God’s punishment circa 586-587 BC. These letters reveal the tetragram, and the Babylonians conquered Lachish only a year later because of the Baalim; moreover, the ‘Ajrud revelations—dating near the initial Assyrian captivity date of 740 BC—reveal YHWH and ASHRTH worship. Both discoveries show that the House of Israel and Judah deified Yahweh immediately preceding their captivities.
A third discovery, from the middle of the eighth century BC, originates from Khirbet el-Qom—a tomb between Hebron and Lachish, in the territory of the House of Judah—and reveals Yahweh as a divinity reverenced together with ASHRTH near the captivity dates.
The Yahwistic Khirbet el-Qom inscription reads:
“Uriyahu the honourable has written this
Blessed is/be Uriyahu by Yahweh
And [because?] from his oppressors by his asherah he has saved him
[written] by Oniyahu
…by his asherah
…and his asherah” [2]
“UrYahu the chief/ruler writing.
Bless UrYahu by YHWH
And from his enemies/rivals by AShRTh deliverance by her
…by OnYahu
…by AShRTh
…and by [Ash]RTh”[3]
The hand on the inscription is a well-known occult symbol often associated with goddesses—cultists still produce the sort of silver amulets found at Ketef Hinnom with this occultic hand, and some include the tetragrammaton:
The pagan ‘Ajrud engravings—manifesting idol worship—existed only a decade before the initial captivity dates and mentioned YHWH of Teman, providing evidence that Esau worshiped Yahweh. Edom had no reason to embrace the God of Israel since the Father isn’t universal, as Scripture declares Him the Lord God of a specific seedline; ergo, the Israelites didn’t spread their Divinity around to alien tribes like the Esau-Edomites—the Lord’s avowed enemies (Mal 1:4, Oba 1:18). The exact opposite happened: Israel embraced the strange gods of the surrounding heathens while forgetting and forsaking their Maker, and instead of persuading Edom to worship the God of Israel, the Israelites slaughtered them in considerable numbers (1Ki 11:15-16; 2Chr 25:11-12). If the God of Abraham is the Lord of every breathing individual, including the weeds He didn’t plant (Mat 13:30, 15:13; Eze 28:24), the Jacobites would preach the Scriptures to Edomites and attempt to convert them—not throw them off high rocks and massacre them with the sword. The Creator speaks in violent terms concerning the Esauites—why archaeological discoveries reveal Edom possessed YHWH as their god only makes sense once understood that the tetragram is a nefarious interpolation.
2 Chronicles 25:20 “… it came of God, that he might deliver them into the hand of their enemies, because they sought after the gods of Edom.”
Israel and Judah sought after “Yahweh” of Edom/Teman; consequently, the Lord delivered them into their enemies’ hands, including the Babylonians, Assyrians, Philistines, and Moabites. Their wretched transgressions—like sexual orgies in the groves of AShRTh and the burning of newborns in human sacrifices—provoked divine wrath. One of Edom’s gods was Yahawah—insisting that Edomites worshiped the God of Israel is baseless.
SWPB exposed the bull-deity, Yahweh, as an enormous deception—most Yahus can’t even provide gratitude but unbelief and insults. People ordinarily become upset when offending their sacred bulls and cows, and this is accurate in a literal sense with YHWH and ASHRTH, as those strange divinities are a bovine couple. Yahwistic dupes also disparage the efforts to expose YHWH’s bovine consort—folks shouldn’t mess with their deity’s strumpet.
Amos 1:1-12 “Thus saith the LORD; For three transgressions of Edom, and for four, I will not turn away the punishment thereof; because he did pursue his brother with the sword, and did cast off all pity, and his anger did tear perpetually, and he kept his wrath for ever: But I will send a fire upon Teman, which shall devour the palaces of Bozrah.”
Israel and Judah worshiped the divinities of foreign nations; hence, one might ponder why the `Ajrud blessings mention YHWH with Edom, whom the Maker hates forever (Mal 1:4). One could further question why the capital of Samaria—a paradise for Baal worshipers—had apparent Yahwistic connections. One should consider why “Yahweh” has associations with goddesses—only strange gods have divine consorts. One might question why the earliest tetragram inscriptions date near the idolatrous time of Jezebel based on evidence from the Moabite Stone. Jacob’s sons renounced their God and replaced Him with Baalim and Ashtaroth, so one ought to contemplate why the “Four Letters”—and related contractions—appeared in widespread use by both Judahites and Israelites directly before their captivity dates. Ultimately, one must ask why Yahweh only lurks in biblical manuscripts of Jewish origin. One straightforward answer explains everything: YHWH is a false god.
Judges 10:6 “And the children of Israel did evil again in the sight of the Lord, and served Baalim, and Ashtaroth, and the gods of Syria, and the gods of Zidon, and the gods of Moab, and the gods of the children of Ammon, and the gods of the Philistines, and forsook the Lord, and served not him.”
1 Samuel 12:10 “And they cried unto the Lord, and said, We have sinned, because we have forsaken the Lord, and have served Baalim and Ashtaroth: but now deliver us out of the hand of our enemies, and we will serve thee.”
Recollect how Jacob’s kinfolk continuously forgot the Lord and supplanted their God with imaginary deities (Jdg 3:7; Psa 106:21; Deu 32:17), resulting in warfare, destruction, and captivity. They didn’t simultaneously serve the Maker with strange divinities; therefore, the tetragrammatons in the Lachish, Khirbet el-Qom, and ‘Ajrud depictions reveal a false deity. Israel not only disremembered their Creator but forsook Him (Jos 24:16, 20; Jdg 2:12, 10:6; Isa 1:28; 1Sam 12:10)—during the time of Jezebel, hardly seven thousand didn’t abandon the Lord for Baal-worship (1Ki 19:18; Rom 11:4).
1 Kings 19:14 “… I have been very jealous for the Lord God of hosts: because the children of Israel have forsaken thy covenant, thrown down thine altars, and slain thy prophets with the sword; and I, even I only, am left; and they seek my life, to take it away.”
Elias assumed himself the only reasonable Israelite remaining, although 7,000 others breathed—the remainder deserted the Maker and committed violence against nonconformists. Israel abandoned the True God, and strange divinities took His place, making it questionable why ASHRTH surfaces with YHWH in archaeological finds. Yahwists pretend Yahweh is the God of Jacob and that AShRTh was an idolatrous element of their religion, suggesting that the Israelites served the Almighty with a “demonic” goddess (Jdg 10:6; 1Sam 12:10), wrecked the Lord’s altars, slew prophets, and elevated the Divine’s alleged name, YHWH, for worship alongside weird deities—such contradictory viewpoints are unreasonable.
Joshua 24:16 “And the people answered and said, God forbid that we should forsake the Lord, to serve other gods.”
The Lachish, Khirbet el-Qom, and ‘Ajrud discoveries contain the name of the false deity that Jacob’s kindred replaced the Lord God with—confirming that Israel and Judah “whored” after Yahweh.
Joshua 5:13-15 “And it came to pass, when Joshua was by Jericho, that he lifted up his eyes and looked, and, behold, there stood a man over against him with his sword drawn in his hand: and Joshua went unto him, and said unto him, Art thou for us, or for our adversaries? And he said, Nay; but as captain [H8269] of the host of the Lord am I now come. And Joshua fell on his face to the earth, and did worship, and said unto him, What saith my Lord unto his servant? And the captain of the Lord’s host said unto Joshua, Loose thy shoe from off thy foot; for the place whereon thou standest is holy. And Joshua did so.”
H8269. sar sar from 8323; a head person (of any rank or class):–captain (that had rule), chief (captain), general, governor, keeper, lord, ((-task-))master, prince(-ipal), ruler, steward.
This “angel” (messenger) was chief of the Lord’s host—Jesus the Christ and Michael the Archangel. During the Burning Bush event, God Almighty commanded Moses to remove his shoes because he stood on hallowed ground (Exo 3:5)—this divine entity instructed Joshua to do likewise after he worshiped the “angel.”
The God of Israel doesn’t have a “proper name,” but several titles functioning as names; only when the Lord inhabited this mortal realm in a fleshy vessel did the Kinsman Redeemer receive a personal name, like every other human—the well-known Greek name Iesou, deriving from what the mainstream identifies as “Joshua” (factually Jeshua). Joshua, the descendant of Nun (Naue), was an Israelite leader and genocidal butcher following Moses’ death (Jos 10:28-42)—a “high priest” over the “body of Moses” (Zec 3:1) named “Joshua” also existed. The Septuagint spells “Joshua” as Iesous with the Greek grammar function and Iesou without it—the Deliverer didn’t obtain a unique name but a common one associated with outstanding killers.
Jesus Christ (Iesou Christos) is distinguishable from “Joshua” by the title of Christ, the appellation Lord (Kyrios), and the town of Nazareth—the Savior’s boyhood home. Jesus the Christ visited “Joshua” at the battle of Jericho and revealed His identity as the “Chief of the Host of the Lord”; the New Testament mentions this chief, born of a virgin, as the prophesied “God with us” (Emmanuel), bearing the titles chief shepherd, chief cornerstone, and chief messenger (1Pet 5:4; Eph 2:20; Jud 1:9; 1Th 4:16).
G2424. Iesous ee-ay-sooce’
of Hebrew origin (3091); Jesus (i.e.Jehoshua), the name of our Lord and two (three) other Israelites:–Jesus.
H3091. Yhowshuwa` yeh-ho-shoo’-ah or Yhowshua {yeh-ho-shoo’-ah}; from 3068 and 3467; Jehovah-saved; Jehoshua (i.e. Joshua), the
Jewish leader:–Jehoshua, Jehoshuah, Joshua. Compare 1954, 3442.H3467. yasha` yaw-shah’ a primitive root; properly, to be open, wide or free, i.e. (by implication) to be safe; causatively, to free or succor:–X at all, avenging, defend, deliver(-er), help, preserve, rescue, be safe, bring (having) salvation, save(-iour), get victory.
H3442. Yeshuwa` yay-shoo’-ah
for 3091; he will save; Jeshua, the name of ten Israelites, also of a place in Palestine:–Jeshua.
The Strong’s Concordance lies again, as Iesous―immortalized in the Septuagint―isn’t of Hebrew origin but of Greek; furthermore, G2424 (Iesous)―from H3442 (Yeshuwa)―does not originate from H3091 since Yhowshuwa is a fabrication. “Joshua” wasn’t a “Jewish” (Canaanite/Edomite) leader, as H3091 claims, but an Israelite. The Strong’s defines Jeshua/Jesus as “he will save,” which indicates what the Savior intended to accomplish.
Matthew 1:21 “And she shall bring forth a son, and thou shalt call his name Jesus: for he shall save his people from their sins.”
Gabriel instructed Mary to call her child Jesus, for “he shall save”—the precise definition of H3442; another name, Emmanuel, expresses what He was. The New Testament gives two names for the Savior and interprets them but omits Yahweh. Yahwists can’t pronounce nor explain the tetragram’s meaning with absolute certainty—many falsely maintain that YHWH originates from HYH (H1961).
The theophoric names applied to the Savior—which materialize in several unpleasant variants—are disgusting; hence, the children of Israel will acknowledge Jesus Christ as Lord (Phil 2:9-11; Zec 14:9) and not the alleged god, Yahweh. Yahwists often refuse to vocalize Jesus and instead utilize the Hebrew name Yahushua, which isn’t the name Jeshua—or “Joshua”—possessed, as no Yahu resides in the proper Greek (G2424) and Hebrew (H3442) forms; moreover, the Yahus anathematized the appellation Lord, although it simply means “supreme in authority” and refers to sovereignty. Yahweh’s chosen erroneously made “Lord” equivalent to the Canaanite term Baal and despised the correct terms—their flawed minds can’t recognize that Baal (H1168) and Lord (H136) are different words.
Nehemiah 8:17 “And all the congregation of them that were come again out of the captivity made booths, and sat under the booths: for since the days of Jeshua [H3442] the son of Nun unto that day had not the children of Israel done so. And there was very great gladness.”
Nehemiah proves an alternate spelling of “Joshua”—without “Yahu” (YHW)—prevails in the Hebrew Old Testament. Jehoshua/Joshua (H3091) is a Jewish invention, and such suspicions are appropriate for other Yahwistic names—doubting what mamzerized “Jews” recorded in Hebraic texts is healthy. Greek manuscripts utilize the corresponding style in Ezra and Nehemiah, and Strong’s H3442 (Yeshua) is equivalent to the name that inspired NT authors employed in Greek form (Iesous). Yahwists should understand that Yahushua isn’t the Lord’s name based on the evidence from H3442, Gabriel’s clarification (Mat 1:21), and the Greek form matching Jeshua (Jesus).
Sacred nameologists claim that notable corruptions of the Greek texts transpired, making them untrustworthy information sources concerning “the Name”—they foolishly suggest the Hebrew translations are more dependable, which antichrist rabbis scribed. To maintain their deceptions about the Savior’s name meaning “Yah saves,” Yahus repudiate the name Jesus/Jeshua/Iesous, contradicting and corrupting the Word—Jesus’ name excludes “Yahu” because the Archangel is too wonderful to be a Yahu. Yahwists desperately want the NT to include YHW, so they assume that the Greek translations aren’t trustworthy and the Jew-scribed “Hebrew” is—unfortunately for them, the Deliverer’s original, unaltered name isn’t theophoric, and Acts 4:10-12 includes no additional names, throwing the Yahwistic trash in the garbage.
Textual corruption doesn’t render the Bible worthless, but tampering occurred—Jewry borrowed the Scriptures while assuming a false identity and corrupted them by interpolating the name of their bull god, which the children of Jacob worshiped in ancient times. Interpolations and scribal mistakes remain in the replicates of the original manuscripts—even spurious apocryphal writings exist, showing that corrupters shall falsify Holy Writ when presented with the opportunity.
Only rewrites of the first biblical scrolls persist—written in Aramaic and Greek—which supposedly stem from the legendary Paleo-Hebrew translations that succumbed to destruction; however, many manuscript copies are identical to the originals, so the faithful can still understand what the Divine intends to know. The NT would mention a “sacred name” if essential; instead, the Lord accepted the Greek word Kyrios when quoting OT Scriptures—Christ Jesus understood the tetragram wasn’t a valid name for God the Father.
Y’shua (YSHW) finds additional inclusion within Chronicles (1Chr 24:11; 2Chr 31:15), ousting the different form with the trigram (YHW-SHW). The Yod prefix in the non-theophoric name YSHW (H3442) isn’t a contraction of YHW—Yods at the commencement of Hebrew verbs make them mean “he will/shall.” Like several Yahwistic names, YHWSHW (H3091) is an interpolation into the Hebrew manuscripts—Jewry would encounter difficulty convincing the ignorant multitudes that Yahweh is God without modifying the names of scriptural figures.
YSHW or YHWSHW—the Savior possesses one of two contrasting names with distinct meanings, and only one is appropriate. Others maintain both are authentic and that H3442 is a short variation, although YSHW holds an entirely different interpretation than the Jewish hoax name, YHWSHW. The trigrammaton (YHW) names are mostly fabrications—like the tetragrammaton. Y’shua—Jeshua in English—is the legitimate Hebrew name for the Savior, with the meaning explained by Gabriel to eliminate uncertainties.
The missing Phoenician manuscripts held by Jacob’s children preceding their captivity remained with haters who supplanted the God of Israel with imaginary gods. Also, evidence shows that Teman (Edom) worshiped YHWH, and they formed alliances with the sons of Jacob to confront mutual enemies (2Ki 3:1-27). During these coalitions, Edom conceivably influenced the Jacobites to worship Yahu and interpolate the tetragrammaton into Phoenician texts. Esau’s involvement with any corruption of Paleo-Hebrew scrolls is hypothetical—backsliding Israelites are additional suspects, and Yahweh was their premier false divinity.
The silver Ketef Hinnom amulets display phrases that appear comparable to some Bible verses but introduce the name of a Baal, whom Judah substituted their Creator with (2Chr 24:7); hence, the Judahites aren’t exempt from the possibility of rewriting Scripture with YHWH injected. What possibly changed in the assumed Phoenician manuscripts was the “name” of God replaced with the tetragram, along with Yahwistic gobbledygook inserted into various personal names. (After Judah’s deportation from Jerusalem and subsequent return, they wrote supposed theophoric names without references to Baal [YHW], as Ezra and Nehemiah record.) This hypothesis makes the Greek Testaments contain corrections to malicious injections that transpired in pre-exilic times. Yahwistic alterations either happened before the captivities or later, but things overall don’t conform to the assumption that Lord is a replacement word intended to conceal the Almighty’s alleged “sacred name”—the evidence demonstrates that “Yahweh” is more plausibly an interpolation.
The Yahwistic narrative insists that malefactors removed God’s alleged name from the Greek documents; conversely, the appellation “Lord” was an interpolation correction. The Septuagint did Christians a service by replacing the false name inserted into Hebrew manuscripts with the proper one—it wasn’t flawless, as these blessed helpers didn’t realize the full extent of the injections, including many personal names. Mamzers probably had no involvement with the LXX—the specifics are uncertain, but Jewry scribed the Qumran Scrolls and Masoretic Text, which both include the tetragrammaton. Unfortunately, most English Old Testaments translate the MT, although the translators corrected the interpolation of YHWH by inserting the approved word, LORD, where the Jews—and whoever else—injected the heathenistic “Four Letters.”
Psalm 97:5 “The hills melted like wax at the presence of the Lord, at the presence of the Lord of the whole earth.”
“And the Lord [G2962] shall be king over all the earth: in that day there shall be one Lord, and His name one.” – Zacharias 14:9, Brenton Septuagint
“And YHWH [H3068] shall be king over all the earth: in that day shall there be one YHWH, and His name one.” – Zechariah 14:9, translated from Jewish manuscripts
Zacharias 14:9 makes no sense if the Greek word Kyrios (G2962) should be YHWH since it indicates several deities possess the name Yahweh—only one Lord shall remain and not one Yahweh. Jesus Christ isn’t Yahweh of yahwehs, but Lord of lords (Deu 10:17; Psa 136:3; 1Tim 6:15; Rev 17:14, 19:16)—Lord/Kyrios is legit, and YHWH embodies a perversion of the original text. Perhaps no deliberate interpolations occurred by every scribe who scribbled the tetragram—some possibly repeated the “error” of introducing YHWH without understanding it doesn’t belong.
Mark 12:29-30 “And Jesus answered him, The first of all the commandments is, Hear, O Israel; The Lord our God is one Lord: And thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy mind, and with all thy strength: this is the first commandment.”
Again, some Bible verses become nonsensical when substituting Kurios with the tetragrammaton—the way the New Testament records it sounds purer.
Deuteronomy 10:17 “For the Lord [H3068] your God is God of gods, and Lord [H113] of lords, a great God, a mighty, and a terrible, which regardeth not persons, nor taketh reward.”
“For the Lord [G2962] your God, he is God of gods, and the Lord of lords, the great, and strong, and terrible God, who does not accept persons, nor will he by any means accept a bribe.” – Deuteronomy 10:17, Brenton Septuagint
Psalm 136:3 “O give thanks to the Lord [H113 & G2962] of lords: for his mercy endureth for ever.”
These verses employ the Hebrew equivalent of the Greek word Kurios; Zechariah 14:9 should also utilize H113 rather than H3068, like the Septuagint. Both Old and New Testaments designate the All-Powerful as the “Lord of lords,” and Zechariah declares there shall be either one Lord (H113 & G2962) or one Yahweh (H3068)—the latter is dubious. Scribes interpolated the tetragram wherever they imagined it could appear legitimate without provoking suspicion, although the dopes blundered with the aforementioned verse.
It makes perfect sense—with an excellent flow—that the Lord our God is a God of gods and Lord of lords, but in deceitful endeavors to modify the text, the Yahus administer their garbage by substituting the traditional appellation—Lord—with YHWH. Heretics misinformed them, insisting that Kurios is corrupt; the Sovereign God solely rejects the Canaanite term “Baal.” Christians shouldn’t anathematize the correct names—Lord isn’t a demonic word, but unadulterated and authentic; contrariwise, the tetragrammaton comprises four letters nobody can accurately pronounce since no one remembers how, yet pompous Yahwists pretend to hold the revelation of its meaning and articulation.
Exodus 6:2-3 “And God spake unto Moses, and said unto him, I am the Lord: And I appeared unto Abraham, unto Isaac, and unto Jacob, by the name of God Almighty, but by my name Jehovah [“Lord”] was I not known to them.”
“And God spoke to Moses and said to him, I am the Lord. And I appeared to Abraam and Isaac and Jacob, being their God, but I did not manifest to them my name Lord.” – Exodus 6:1-3, Brenton Septuagint
The Lord provided the name/authority of God Almighty when appearing unto Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob—by His name, Lord, He didn’t declare to be:
Genesis 35:11 “And God said unto him, I am God Almighty: be fruitful and multiply; a nation and a company of nations shall be of thee, and kings shall come out of thy loins.”
Genesis 48:3 “And Jacob said unto Joseph, God Almighty appeared unto me at Luz in the land of Canaan, and blessed me.”
The Creator proclaims Himself “God Almighty” in Genesis XLV, which He describes as a “name” (Exo 6:3)—in Exodus 6:2, God states, “I am the Lord,” which doesn’t differ from “God Almighty,” representing both a name and title. In Exodus 3:6, the Almighty declares His identity as the God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob—down into verse fifteen, the Divine provides a name unknown to Moses’ ancestors: Lord (Kurios) or “Lord God of [the before-mentioned individuals].”
The Maker instructed Moses to present the name “Lord God of the Hebrews” (H5680) while conversing with the Egyptian Pharaoh (Exo 3:18, 7:16, 9:1, 13), indicating the Pharaoh recognized the Israelites by the name “Hebrews,” which the Strong’s Concordance describes as Eber’s descendants:
H5680. `Ibriy ib-ree’ patronymic from 5677; an Eberite (i.e. Hebrew) or descendant of Eber:–Hebrew(-ess, woman).
H5677. `Eber ay’-ber the same as 5676; Eber, the name of two patriarchs and four Israelites:–Eber, Heber.
H5676. `eber ay’-ber from 5674; properly, a region across; but used only adverbially (with or without a preposition) on the opposite side (especially of the Jordan; usually meaning the east):–X against, beyond, by, X from, over, passage, quarter, (other, this) side, straight.
Exodus 10:3 “And Moses and Aaron came in unto Pharaoh, and said unto him, Thus saith the Lord God of the Hebrews, How long wilt thou refuse to humble thyself before me? let my people go, that they may serve me.”
According to Yahwists, the Almighty withheld His “extra special” and sacred personal name to Moses’ forefathers by utilizing a title, although the Lord revealed to Moses His super name—Yahawah. Contrarily, the name presented to Moses was another title, and tetragram conjectures aren’t names of the Almighty; otherwise, the Lord surely drank an excessive quantity of sacredly divine hooch while picking these outlandish-sounding names. Yahu isn’t respectable—believers should respect the Divine by not calling Him retarded-sounding names.
Yahus often understand “God Almighty” isn’t a personal name; however, it remains a genuine title revealed to Moses’ fathers, but for some groups, “Lord God” is anathema, so they instead utilize Yahwistic conjectures because tricksters injected YHWH into their Hebrew translations. Yahwists dismiss the New Testament verses confirming Jesus Christ of Nazareth as the only saving name—Yahweh isn’t the name above all others (Act 4:10-12; Phil 2:9-11).
YHWH is a destroying name and a strange god that brought destruction upon Jacob’s kindred—only those who contradict Holy Writ to uphold fantasy stories about sacred names can’t determine Yahweh isn’t a saving name. Acts and Philippians destroy the “sacred name” delusions but don’t expect Yahwists to honor them—faulty arguments about why the Greek manuscripts omit the tetragrammaton abound, and Yahus blatantly deny Scripture to sneak in Yahwistic gibberish.
Exodus 34:14 “For thou shalt worship no other god: for the Lord, whose name is Jealous, is a jealous God.”
“For ye shall not worship strange gods, for the Lord God, a jealous name, is a jealous God.” – Exodus 34:14, LXX
Amos 5:27 “Therefore will I cause you to go into captivity beyond Damascus, saith the Lord, whose name is The God of hosts.”
“And I will carry you away beyond Damascus, saith the Lord, the Almighty God is his name.” – Amos 5:27, LXX
Zechariah 6:12 “And speak unto him, saying, Thus speaketh the Lord of hosts, saying, Behold the man whose name is The Branch; and he shall grow up out of his place, and he shall build the temple of the Lord.”
Revelation 19:13 “And he was clothed with a vesture dipped in blood: and his name is called The Word of God.”
Revelation 19:16 “And he hath on his vesture and on his thigh a name written, King Of Kings, And Lord Of Lords.”
“For it is the Lord that made thee; the Lord of hosts is his name: and he that delivered thee, he is the God of Israel, and shall be called so by the whole earth.” – Esaias 54:5, LXX
Isaiah 54:5 “For thy Maker is thine husband; the Lord of hosts is his name; and thy Redeemer the Holy One of Israel; The God of the whole earth shall he be called.”
More titles functioning as names—Yahus can’t appreciate the name conveyed to Moses at the Burning Bush was an additional title rather than a personal name that requires speculations to pronounce and understand. Esaias says the whole “earth” shall call Him “the God of Israel”; moreover, may the name of “the God of Jacob” defend thee (Psa 20:1). Since “Yahweh” isn’t His name, the God of Abraham won’t tolerate this fabrication. Yahus who disavow Scripture to make the tetragram appear authentic are certifiable—their unhealthy Yahwistic spirits linger under the thrall of deception.
Romans 1:21-23 “Because that, when they knew God, they glorified him not as God, neither were thankful; but became vain in their imaginations, and their foolish heart was darkened. Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools, And changed the glory of the uncorruptible God into an image made like to corruptible man, and to birds, and fourfooted beasts, and creeping things.”
Since the Yahwist faction can’t produce factual ascertainments of the correct tetragram vowels, none should make such determinations, although egos prevent this—as the enlightened “elect of God,” Yahwists comprehend the Almighty’s supreme “personal name,” while the “lessers” don’t understand His “real” name.
Psalm 106:19-23 “They made a calf in Horeb, and worshipped the molten image. Thus they changed their glory into the similitude of an ox that eateth grass. They forgat God their saviour, which had done great things in Egypt; Wondrous works in the land of Ham, and terrible things by the Red sea. Therefore he said that he would destroy them, had not Moses his chosen stood before him in the breach, to turn away his wrath, lest he should destroy them.”
God’s people disremembered Him, changed their glory into the likeness of a molten calf at Horeb, and repeated this following their pilgrimage to the Promised Land—this “glory” replacement didn’t include transforming the Lord into an anthropomorphic entity, but the forsaking and forgetting of their Deity and His subsequent replacement with strange deities. Israel possessed multiple imaginary divinities—as witnessed by YHWH and ASHRTH.
Jeremiah 2:11-13 “Hath a nation changed their gods, which are yet no gods? but my people have changed their glory for that which doth not profit. Be astonished, O ye heavens, at this, and be horribly afraid, be ye very desolate, saith the Lord. For my people have committed two evils; they have forsaken me the fountain of living waters, and hewed them out cisterns, broken cisterns, that can hold no water.”
Pagans portrayed “Yahweh” as a bull alongside his bovine consort—it was unlawful to produce these graven images (Deu 4:16-18; Exo 20:4). Yahweh’s elect believe the Israelites transformed their God into a bull and pimp with divine wives and suggest the children of Jacob didn’t sincerely forsake and forget their Divinity but customized Him. Israel didn’t keep the Lord around to worship in animal form with consorts while destroying His altars, killing prophets, and whoring after strange divinities—they renounced the Almighty and substituted Him with false gods. Yahwists are under extreme delusions, mainly because the Devil interpolated the tetragrammaton—students shouldn’t esteem Satan’s translations.
1 Peter 3:15-16 “But sanctify the Lord God in your hearts: and be ready always to give an answer to every man that asketh you a reason of the hope that is in you with meekness and fear: Having a good conscience; that, whereas they speak evil of you, as of evildoers, they may be ashamed that falsely accuse your good conversation in Christ.”
“I am the Lord God: that is my name: I will not give my glory to another, nor my praises to graven images.” – Esaias 42:8, LXX
Luke 1:68 “Blessed be the Lord God of Israel; for he hath visited and redeemed his people.”
God Almighty is the Maker’s designation, and so is Lord God or “Lord God of Israel.” Yahus bestow glory and praise on an imaginary deity, and some orchestrate this deliberately—the Lord won’t give His glory to false divinities nor His praises to graven images depicting bulls. Kyrios Theos, or Lord God in English, is a commonly found name throughout the Greek Old Testament, which the inspired NT composers also employed—they understood the truth, unlike the charlatans. Yahwists are delusional enough to suggest that editors removed the tetragram from the Greek Testaments and that Jewish scrolls accurately convey the Father’s supposed “name.”
Yahwists wish to appear knowledgeable about a “proper name” for the God of Jacob and produce hundreds of phony vowel guesses for YHWH—when one Yahwist faction speculates the pronunciation a certain way, another will conjecture it differently. Yahwistic assemblies generally maintain different opinions on the name of their bull-deity—such guesswork is needless because YHWH is a fictitious deity.
The Divine possesses several names—Lord is one, and God Almighty is another (Rev 16:14; Gen 35:11; Exo 6:2-3); Revelation designates Him “Lord God Almighty” (Rev 4:8, 11:17, 15:3, 16:7, 21:22), combining two names into one. While these “names” don’t distinguish who this Sovereign God is, Exodus 3:15 provides His identity as the Lord God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob—a memorial name the All-Powerful demands in remembrance. The authority of His names comes not from phonetic sounds or syllables but through the persons of God the Father and the Son of God. Languages have different articulations, and communicating in English instead of spooky tongues originating from Babylon (confusion) is admissible. The “sacred name” sect circulates the name of a fictional divinity that satanic scribes interpolated into biblical texts—nobody anointed by the Father does this, making these Yahus infiltrators or misinformation victims. Use of the name YHWH can identify potential screwballs, although many Yahwists are parrots.
Scriptural translations with the tetragrammaton are untrustworthy works of the Devil—determining what Jewry modified is challenging. Much is accurate when comparing the Hebrew with the Septuagint, but copious differences arise. Chapters exist in the Hebrew manuscripts altogether different from the Septuagint—one example is the LXX doesn’t record the strange and contradictory account of Mesha in II Kings 3:4-27. In Satan’s translation, Elisha speaks for the Lord and declares God will deliver the Moabites into Israel’s hand, and while the conflict initially goes their way, Mesha performs a human sacrifice of his son, which generates “great indignation” against Israel, causing the attackers to withdraw from the engagement (2Ki 3:26-27). This inconsistent story makes the Lord a liar or Elisha a false prophet and bestows genuine power to Moab’s deity, with blood sacrifices delivered to Kemosh capable of thwarting the God of Jacob; nonetheless, this report isn’t in the Septuagint—some rascals probably fabricated the story and inserted it into the “Hebrew.”
The LXX includes this tale in Kings IV instead—if an authentic story, the outcome didn’t advance as planned, probably because the attacking Israelites and Judahites held fictitious gods and/or golden calves, and Mesha’s sacrifice appeased the God of Israel, who consequently brought indignation against His idol-worshiping people. Scripture went through significant editing, making the text questionable at times—when the Septuagint and Hebrew present similar stories, things are less suspicious.
2 Kings 3:1-3 “Now Jehoram the son of Ahab began to reign over Israel in Samaria the eighteenth year of Jehoshaphat king of Judah, and reigned twelve years. And he wrought evil in the sight of the Lord; but not like his father, and like his mother: for he put away the image of Baal that his father had made. Nevertheless he cleaved unto the sins of Jeroboam the son of Nebat, which made Israel to sin; he departed not therefrom.”
From the beginning of the Mesha account, Israel’s latest corrupt ruler, Jehoram, cleaved unto Jeroboam’s golden calves, like every other king coming along in Israel—their nation had these idols during their alliance with the Esaurians to attack Moab.
Jeroboam possibly invented YHWH and ASHRTH when he produced those golden calves (1Ki 12:28-29), indicating that “Yahweh” wasn’t an Esaurian god; nevertheless, YHWH would be a fictional deity of Jeroboam’s imagination. Where Jeroboam acquired these supposed deities is debatable—they were either his invention or borrowed from neighboring regions. Edomites conceivably adopted Yahweh from the rebellious Israelites as they once had a short-lived pact to combat enemies—even if accurate, Edom turned out as traitors. 2nd Kings Chapter III recounts this alliance and the controversial story about Mesha performing human sacrifices to appease Kemosh and get the assailing forces off Moab’s back.
YHWH and ASHRTH as Jeroboam’s calves is speculation—another possibility is that the false gods prompting Jacob’s captivity are the bull-god Yahweh and his bovine consorts, i.e., Ashtaroth and Baalim. Weird goddesses alongside the God of Jacob are antithetical unless YHWH is also a strange god.
“Each god had for his complement a goddess, who was proclaimed ‘mistress’ of the city, Baalat, or ‘queen,’ Milkat, of heaven, just as the god himself was recognised as ‘master’ or ‘king.’* As a rule, the goddess was contented with the generic name of Astarte; but to this was often added some epithet, which lent her a distinct personality, and prevented her from being confounded with the Astartes of neighbouring cities, her companions or rivals.**
* Among goddesses to whom the title ‘Baalat’ was referred, we have the goddess of Byblos, Baalat-Gebal, also the goddess of Berytus, Baalat-Berith, or Beyrut. The epithet ‘queen of heaven’ is applied to the Phoenician Astarte by Hebrew (Jer. vii. 18, xliv. 18-29) and classic writers. The Egyptians, when they adopted these Canaanitish goddesses, preserved the title, and called each of them nibit pit, ‘lady of heaven.’ In the Phoenician inscriptions their names are frequently preceded by the word Rabbat: rabbat Baalat-Gebal, ‘(my) lady Baalat-Gebal.’
** The Hebrew writers frequently refer to the Canaanite goddesses by the general title ‘the Ashtaroth’ or ‘Astartes,’ and a town in Northern Syria bore the significant name of Istarati = ‘the Ishtars, the Ashtaroth,’ a name which finds a parallel in Anathoth = ‘the Anats,’ a title assumed by a town of the tribe of Benjamin; similarly, the Assyrio-Chaldaeans called their goddesses by the plural of Ishtar. The inscription on an Egyptian amulet in the Louvre tells us of a personage of the XXth dynasty, who, from his name, Rabrabina, must have been of Syrian origin, and who styled himself ‘Prophet of the Astartes,’ Honnutir Astiratu.”[9]
The Ashtaroth, Ishtars, and Anathoth are universal names of fictitious goddesses in plural forms—the Septuagint provides their names as Astarte and Astaroth. Unlike the Baals, the Ashtaroth didn’t regularly carry additional designations, or at least most discoveries don’t mention them. Whether these deities held supplementary names isn’t clear—the male divinities would typically possess the title Baal yet had other names, such as Yahweh and Kemosh. Idolaters paired Astarte/Ashtoreth with YHWH, the Baal counterpart of this goddess; the children of Israel celebrated plenteous Baals and Ashtoreths.
1 Kings 18:19 “Now therefore send, and gather to me all Israel unto mount Carmel, and the prophets of Baal four hundred and fifty, and the prophets of the groves [‘asherah’] four hundred, which eat at Jezebel’s table.”
Baal and the asherah emerged around Elias’ generation. The four-hundred prophets of “the asherah” in Kings Chapter XVIII were prophets of an Ashtoreth, as the “asherahs” are mere trees or objects of these goddesses—OT scribes also left Baal unidentified, which could refer to copious false divinities. The Moabite Stone provides the earliest acknowledged tetragram inscription, which mentions Ahab’s father, Omri, and states his son succeeded him, and Mesha was triumphant over his descendants’ house. The consonants ASHRTH are nearly identical to the ASHTRTH alluded to in Scripture and thus represent the same goddesses, making it evident who that bull-deity named Yahweh is—this broad accompanies Baalim elsewhere by name (1Sam 12:10; Jdg 10:6) and by the “asherah” associations. Discoveries showing the name ASHRTH reveal a Baal (YHWH) functioning as her husband. Jehoram removed the image of Baal his father Ahab constructed but continued in Jeroboam’s transgressions, making it appear Baalim and those golden calves have no relations.
Proving YHWH was the Baal during Jezebel’s time or if Israel worshiped one exclusive Baal throughout that timeframe is challenging—the Moabite Stone dates sometime near or after Jezebel, and innumerable Baalim existed. Mesha’s appropriation of the vessels of “Yahweh” from Nebo was likely after the reign of Ahab, as Moabite military campaigns against Israel continued for years following the first rebellion recorded in II Kings.
The heathens surrounding Israel hailed their goddesses by the designation Ashtoreth, yet each deity had distinctive characteristics, just as the Baalim were different. Ashtaroth is the generic name of Baalim consorts—pagans often called these female counterparts to the Baalim the same name, although their divine Baals (Masters) possessed unique names.
1 Kings 11:33 “… they have forsaken me, and have worshipped Ashtoreth the goddess of the Zidonians ….”
Judges 2:13 “And they forsook the Lord, and served Baal and Ashtaroth.”
Judges 10:6 “And the children of Israel did evil again in the sight of the Lord, and served Baalim, and Ashtaroth ….”
1 Samuel 7:3 “… put away the strange gods and Ashtaroth from among you ….”
1 Samuel 12:10 “… We have sinned, because we have forsaken the Lord, and have served Baalim and Ashtaroth ….”
Ashtoreth isn’t the designation of any precise goddess but the singular form of a universal name biblical authors utilized to describe Canaanitish goddesses. Ashtoreth, the goddess of the Zidonians, identifies an Astarte worshiped during the events of 1st Kings Chapter XI, and multiple Ashtoreths existed—the Ashtaroth. The Ashtoreth seen in the ‘Ajrud inscriptions was conceivably an Edomic Astarte, and the Mesha Stele appears to mention a Moabite Astarte named Ashtar-Kemosh. People mistake names such as Ashtoreth, Astarte, and Ishtar for the personal names of specific goddesses venerated by many societies—such designations don’t mention distinct deities, as the Ashtoreths changed from location to location, like the Baals.
“A previously invisible inscription on the back of an 2,600-year-old pottery shard, which was on display at a museum in Jerusalem for over 50 years, has given researchers some new insight into life during Israel’s First Temple period.
The ancient shard was uncovered at the desert fortress of Arad in 1965 and dates back to 600 BC, before the Kingdom of Judah was destroyed by Babylonian King Nebuchadnezzar, according to Jewish News Service.
After deciphering 50 characters on the back, researchers understood the previously hidden inscription was a continuation of the text on the front. The newly discovered text begins with a request for wine and a guarantee for assistance if the addressee has any of his own requests.
‘It seems that these guys drank quite a lot, or maybe the wine was used for antiseptic reasons,’ Shaus observed.
More significantly, perhaps, is its comparatively free use of the tetragrammaton, the four Hebrew letters used for the name of God, Y-H-W-H. In Arie Shaus’s estimation, it demonstrates a very different attitude towards Jewish laws. Shaus, of Tel Aviv University, was one of the principal researchers who studied the artifact.
‘The front side of the shard was thoroughly studied, and it begins with some kind of standard letter opening, with one person blessing another using the name of God, ‘Y-H-W-H,’ Shaus told JNS.org. This use of sacred language is ‘interesting and important’ because it shows the Jewish religion and laws currently used by modern Jews ‘are a bit different to what was practiced back then.’ The fact that Jews living in Israel 2,600 years ago could ‘freely’ write the full spelling of God’s name differs from modern Jewish law forbidding the practice.”[17]
Some Yahus requested lots of booze in the name of YHWH, probably for drunken orgies in the groves of AShRTh. Modern-day “Jews” weren’t the inhabitants of Jerusalem in olden days—Judahites and Israelites were; many ancient Greek cities surface in “Israel” but no Jewish ones.
The `Ajrud discoveries confirm Israel performed their habitual naughtiness of forsaking God and celebrating Baalim and Ashtaroth in the eighth century BC. That followed the conclusions of the Mesha story, indicating that if Joram discarded the image of Baal, this didn’t last—Israelites celebrated Yahweh and the groves immediately preceding their captivity dates. The divinity YHWH found along ASHRTH in inscriptions at Kuntillet ‘Ajrud and Khirbet el-Qom is another strange god. Believing that Jacob’s descendants made the God of Israel AShRTh’s spouse and kept the Lord around for reverence alongside such goddesses is unwise, especially since they forsook their Maker. Teman and the idolatrous city of Samaria worshiped this Baal and Ashtoreth, which isn’t surprising for obvious reasons—they performed the YHWH and ASHRTH idolatries while serving not Him (Jud 10:6; 1Sam 12:10). The God of Jacob and AShRTh aren’t harmonious, but Yahweh and Ashtoreth make a compelling couple—two false deities would get along together as husband and wife.
It isn’t difficult to demonstrate the tetragrammaton represents a pseudo-deity; however, folks relish deceptions and don’t appreciate their falsities becoming exposed—especially when money comes into play—so the truth is seldom of value. Truthfulness isn’t worth much in a satanic world established on deceit, where lies advance folks, and delivering truth causes more trouble (Jer 9:3-9). Truth purveyors might experience ostracization or other negatives, but that’s not unusual—the Israelites did that unto the prophets (Luk 6:22-23).
YHWH is one of the Baalim shown next to ASHRTH—nothing else makes sense. Israel relinquished the Fountain of Living Waters, replaced Him with broken cisterns (Jer 2:11-13), destroyed altars, and slew prophets after forsaking the Almighty for Baalim and Ashtaroth, meaning the customization hypothesis is nonsense, and the husband of an Ashtoreth celebrated by Israel was Yahweh. Not all false deities possessed the appellation “Baal,” so whether YHWH held such titles is unknown—still, only strange gods have an Ashtoreth. The `Ajrud inscriptions contain the name Baal, which likely refers to the husband of this Astarte.
Where Israel obtained the tetragram is uncertain, but Esauites remain the primary suspects. Some Edomite Yahus breathed during the fourteenth century BC:
“The designation YHW was apparently not unknown in Egypt. Amenhotep III’s fourteenth century B.C.E. Topographical List from Soleb in Nubia, as well as a thirteenth century B.C.E. text, written during the reign of Ramesses II, mentions ‘Yhw [Yahu] in the land of the shasu’ (Nakai 2003:141). Nakai (2003:141) indicates that this reference to Yahu provides ‘the earliest evidence for the god Yahweh and linking him with these nomadic people’ [the Shasu]. According to Egyptian sources, the Shasu appeared over a widespread area, but were identified as coming forth from Edom in southern Transjordan (Zevit 2001:118). Additional Egyptian evidence from Ramesses II and Ramesses III, connects the ‘land of the Shosu’ [Shasu] and Seir. In Papyrus Anastasi VI the earliest known reference to the land Edom is recorded. The letter mentions the arrival of the Shasu tribes and their flocks at one of the Egyptian border fortresses, which had been constructed during the Ramesside period: ‘Another information for my lord that we have just let the Shasu tribes of Edom pass the Fortress of Merneptah-hetephermaat, … in order to revive themselves and revive their flocks from the great life force of Pharaoh, …’ (Hallo & Younger 2002:16-17). It is therefore apparent that both Edom and Seir were peopled by Shasu (Bartlett 1989:37-38). A strong tradition in the Hebrew Bible links Edom and Seir. In the light of the aforementioned Egyptian references, it thus seems that the origin of Yahweh [Yahu] worship should be searched for among the Shasu of Edom and the regions of Mount Seir, as early as the end of the fifteenth century B.C.E. or the beginning of the fourteenth century B.C.E.”[7]
The earliest trigrammaton (YHW) inscription is in Egyptian hieroglyphics, revealing that Edom possessed YHW as their god since the Bronze Age. The trigrammaton is an alternative spelling of YHWH, as exhibited among fifth-century BC Elephantine papyri discoveries:
“In Elephantine (modern Aswan) in Egypt, the 5th century Elephantine papyri make mention of a goddess called Anat-Yahu (Anat-Yahweh) worshiped in the temple to Yahweh originally built by Jewish refugees from the Babylonian conquest of Judah. These suggest that ‘even in exile and beyond the worship of a female deity endured.’ The texts were written by a group of Jews living at Elephantine near the Nubian border, whose religion has been described as ‘nearly identical to Iron Age II Judahite religion’. The papyri describe the Jews as worshiping Anat-Yahu (or AnatYahu). Anat-Yahu is described as either the wife (or paredra, sacred consort) of Yahweh or as a hypostatized aspect of Yahweh.”[8]
Exiles from the Babylonian destruction of Jerusalem possessed Yahu as their deity, together with an alleged goddess named Anat-Yahu. Baal—and his consort(s)—provoked the displacements of these refugees, and the discoveries record which false gods were responsible. Anat-Yahu parallels Ashtar-Kemosh, the designation of an Ashtaroth on the Mesha Stele—these are two specific identifications for Ashtaroth and Anathoth, which utilize the theophoric names of the male deity (the Baal) as a suffix following the Ashtar and Anat prefixes. The Moabite Stone mentions Mesha building or rebuilding a water reservoir named “Baal-meon”; likewise, David supposedly called a place “Baal-perazim,” describing the phrase, “breach of waters,” meaning Baal-perazim likely had a water cistern, like Baal-meon. Mesha used the appellation Baal to reverence his divinity, with Kemosh numbering among the diverse Baalim of surrounding nations.
With Yahweh of Teman, Yahu of the Shasu of Edom, and Christ-hating Jews having attachments to the tetragram—with traditions of interpolating it—one can guess the origins of YHWH worship. Yahweh is only present in Jewish Old Testament manuscripts while missing in the New Testament and Septuagint. Edom possessed their own divinities, but Yahwists assume YHWH is the God of Israel and not of Esau, making Edom’s Yahu worship unusual. The Esaurians have links to Yahweh in the eighth century BC, and so does Samaria, a Baal-worshiping hotspot.
Psalm 108:9 “… over Edom will I cast out my shoe ….”
Malachi 1:4 “… they shall call Edom, The border of wickedness, and, The people against whom the Lord hath indignation for ever.”
Obadiah 1:9 “… thy mighty men, O Teman, shall be dismayed, to the end that every one of the mount of Esau may be cut off by slaughter.”
Some pretend Edom’s involvement with Yahweh was their pious undertaking to acknowledge the God of Jacob and His alleged name—instead of the Jacobites forsaking their Divinity for Baalim and Ashtaroth, Esau’s kindred adopted the God of the Israelites, which differs from the standard practice of Israel supplanting their God with alien deities. Edom’s worship of YHWH involved an Ashtoreth along with the “asherah” of this goddess, as observed with the “Yahweh of Teman” inscription—nothing was righteous about this, as the Ashtaroth accompanied an evil deity designated with the title Baal, yet elsewhere Holy Writ identifies them as “strange gods and Ashtaroth” (1Sam 7:3). The Almighty doesn’t have an Ashtoreth, nor is He the god of Edom; hence, Yahweh isn’t the God of Israel.
Jeremiah 7:16-18 “Therefore pray not thou for this people, neither lift up cry nor prayer for them, neither make intercession to me: for I will not hear thee. Seest thou not what they do in the cities of Judah and in the streets of Jerusalem? The children gather wood, and the fathers kindle the fire, and the women knead their dough, to make cakes to the queen of heaven, and to pour out drink offerings unto other gods, that they may provoke me to anger.”
The preceding Bible passage discusses the “queen of heaven” and “other” divinities. Archaeology reveals that ASHRTH was a goddess Judahites revered in Jeremiah’s time—the additional gods worshiped included Yahweh since archaeological records mention them together.
It might not be beneficial to pray for Yahweh’s proponents. Part of their unwillingness to accept the revelation that they stretched their hands out to an alien divinity (Psa 44:20-21)—and seduced others to follow suit—is because the Lord bestows Yahus powerful delusions, plus many consider themselves superior and “top level.” These distinguished representatives of a fictitious deity can’t admit incorrectness and welcome correction without acknowledging that people anointed by God don’t come in the name of false deities.
2 Thessalonians 2:10-12 “And with all deceivableness of unrighteousness in them that perish; because they received not the love of the truth, that they might be saved. And for this cause God shall send them strong delusion, that they should believe a lie: That they all might be damned who believed not the truth, but had pleasure in unrighteousness.”
Yahweh isn’t the only “bull” Yahwists delude people about, although their tetragrammaton acceptance shows deliberate lies or delusions—they praise and worship a strange divinity and deceive others into doing likewise. Certain Yahus aren’t capable of understanding, no matter the evidence, as the delusionary work is God-given and powerful.
Jewry altered names when they injected the tetragram—regardless, Yahwists esteem the Jewish translations of Scripture, and their fantasies cause them to see Yahu in any filthy Hebrew name whatsoever, provided “ah” or “ja” is present. Some allege Yahu is visible in “Hebrew” names like Noah and “Elijah,” although Greek scriptures disclose these names as Noe and Elias—No-ah becomes No-e and Eli-jah becomes Eli-as.
“Sacred namers” obtained the tetragrammaton from Jewish mongrels who recorded it within Hebrew manuscripts; moreover, archaeology reveals YHWH as a manufactured deity. Jews aren’t the dependable custodians of God’s Word nor trustworthy enough to assume they modified nothing significant in scriptural texts; nonetheless, many believe them and accept their dung-god as the God of Israel. Yahus that never analyzed rabbinical translations likely wouldn’t have Yahweh as their deity! Assorted Yahwists profess to be wise to Jewish hoaxes but still succumb to the scribal interpolations of rabbis, although it’s doubtful such characters don’t understand YHWH is a false deity—several employ this evil name with deliberate malice.
With the malicious injections of the tetragram and assumed theophoric contractions in names, nobody knows if “Elijah” had a Yahwistic name—he could have been an Eliel (H447). Furthermore, it doesn’t prove YHWH is the God of Israel if Elijah’s name was originally Yahwistic, as their kingdom was replete with idolaters, and his parents possibly named him after Yahwah. Eliel means “my God is God”—the name used by a chief in David’s military, a leader of the tribe of Manasseh, a Benjamite leader, and four “lesser” characters. (1Chr 5:24, 8:20-22, 11:46-47, 12:11, 15:9, 11; 2Chr 31:13.) Scripture records prominent people named Eliel, but only one mysterious “Elijah,” meaning “my God is Yahu”; this prophet appeared after those Israelites named Eliel passed. The probabilities are the name “Elijah” resulted from scribal interpolations occurring before the Septuagint existed, assuming his parents—who likely worshiped Baalim—didn’t name him. “Elijah” lived throughout a season of Baal worshipers, and the Eliels breathed when “good” kings like David reigned.
If the consonants Yod-He observed in Hebrew names are tetragram contractions, understand the nations of Israel and Judah changed their gods (Jer 2:11-13), resulting in transformations to personal names. Accordingly, after Jacobite women birthed their children, the assignment of names associated with the false deities their nation whored after was commonplace, and these unfortunate souls had no choice but to hold such Yahwistic names because they received them at birth. Judahites likewise had no alternative but to possess Babylonian names while in captivity:
Daniel 1:6-7 “Now among these were of the children of Judah, Daniel, Hananiah, Mishael, and Azariah: Unto whom the prince of the eunuchs gave names: for he gave unto Daniel the name of Belteshazzar; and to Hananiah, of Shadrach; and to Mishael, of Meshach; and to Azariah, of Abednego.”
Archaeology is the exclusive means to substantiate whether Bible characters with Yahwistic names had one, and insufficient evidence endures. Such alleged names earlier than the eighth century BC are nonexistent, and the oldest recognized tetragrammaton inscription linked with the children of Israel is presumably from the late ninth century BC. Jews expect the masses to believe what their lying tribesmen inscribed into Hebrew documents—if such rogues injected YHWH, they would undoubtedly modify names to make their interpolations appear authentic. The theophoric name Yahushua (Joshua) had the non-Yahwistic spelling YSHW in some manuscripts, and the New Testament and Septuagint authors utilized this version. Jewry needed to interpolate Yahwistic names into biblical texts because, preceding the ninth century BC, the Jacobites didn’t worship Yahweh as their divinity, and nobody unearths inscriptions of YHWH and associated theophoric names until much further into the formation of the Israelite tribes. Israel sacrificed to gods coming newly up (Deu 32:17); hence, archaeologists only discovered the tetragram and supposed Yahwistic names in connection to the Israelites no later than the ninth century BC. The only other potential discovery is from the topographical lists of Amenhotep III from the 14th century BC, which connects Edomite Shasu tribes to the trigrammaton (YHW).
Biblical names commencing with YHW or ending with YH are what Yahwists hold for evidence YHWH is the God of Jacob—such names are the consequences of a change in deities happening in the 9th century BC, along with large-scale injections of falsified theophoric names. Yahwistic names during and before David’s lifetime are fabrications, which persuades people to believe the Yahwistic contractions are older than they are. Mayhaps the consonants YH/YW aren’t even reductions of YHWH/YHW, although they certainly could be—the abbreviation “Yahu” appears in the names of Judahites who renounced the Almighty and supplanted Him with strange gods, like Yahweh, directly before their captivity dates.
Conspicuous fabrications arise where dishonest scribes mishandled their scribal injections, showing modified Yahwistic names:
2 Samuel 8:17 “And Zadok the son of Ahitub, and Ahimelech the son of Abiathar, were the priests; and Seraiah was the scribe.”
1 Chron. 18:16 “And Zadok the son of Ahitub, and Abimelech the son of Abiathar, were the priests; and Shavsha was scribe.”
Seraiah is fictitious—his original name was Shavsha.
1 Chron. 15:17 “So the Levites appointed Heman the son of Joel; and of his brethren, Asaph the son of Berechiah; and of the sons of Merari their brethren, Ethan the son of Kushaiah.”
1 Chron. 6:44 “And their brethren the sons of Merari stood on the left hand: Ethan the son of Kishi, the son of Abdi, the son of Malluch.”
Kushaiah is a Yahwistic falsification—his initial name was Kishi; the theophoric names that Jews interpolate are dubious.
2 Chron. 12:16 “And Rehoboam slept with his fathers, and was buried in the city of David: and Abijah his son reigned in his stead.”
1 Kings 15:8 “And Abijam slept with his fathers; and they buried him in the city of David: and Asa his son reigned in his stead.”
Abijam becomes Abijah, making it Yahwistic. Producing mistakes while composing documents is easy, especially in past centuries, without computers and software—researchers shall never uncover how many theophoric names were this way in the earliest manuscripts. When interpolating the tetragrammaton, tampering with the personal names of Bible characters is desirable to heighten the believability of such hoaxes.
1 Chronicles 6:28 “And the sons of Samuel; the firstborn Vashni, and Abiah.”
1 Samuel 8:2 “Now the name of his firstborn was Joel [H3100]; and the name of his second, Abiah: they were judges in Beersheba.”
Vashni was the original name of Samuel’s firstborn—1st Samuel introduces his counterfeit name. The data suggests Joel is Yahwistic, although YH/YHW is lacking in this name.
H3100. Yow’el yo-ale’ from 3068 and 410; Jehovah (is his) God; Joel, the name of twelve Israelites:–Joel.
Notwithstanding the Yahwist delusions of seeing Yahu, and thus Yahuwah in Hebrew names provided they begin with the Hebrew consonant Yod/Yud, other supposedly non-Yahwistic names exist, like Jonah.
H3124. Yonah yo-naw’ the same as 3123; Jonah, an Israelite:–Jonah.
H3123. yownah yo-naw’ probably from the same as 3196; a dove (apparently from the warmth of their mating):–dove, pigeon.
Joel and Jonah include identical initial Hebrew consonants (YW), although Jonah isn’t theophoric and allegedly has the definition of “dove.”
Many Yahwists erroneously assume a hidden “A” follows Hebrew names with Yod (Y) prefixes, indicating such names have the Yahwistic interpretation of “Ya.” The tetragram advances from YHWH (יְהֹוָה) down to the trigrammaton (יְהוֹ), then further contracts to -YH (יָּה), and, ultimately, all the way to Y- (יְ), with each consonant arrangement signifying a theophoric name to delusional Yahus—they desire it to mean this and, consequently, deceive themselves. Yahus fabricate supplementary theophoric names starting with a Yod to maintain their deceptions and believe most students are too simple to challenge their foolishness that names beginning with a Yod produce the theophoric definition of a deity named Ya. It doesn’t matter if names exclude Yod-He (YH) and Yod-He-Vav (YHW)—provided with a Yod, any name Yahwists wish to be Yahwistic shall become that way. The entire scheme is a ridiculous mind trick the Yahus play on those too ignorant to uncover their falsities.
Yahweh’s disciples don’t even require the falsified names lurking within biblical manuscripts to make the tetragram appear authentic, as names beginning with only a Yod can whimsically become theophoric. Yahwists mislead about “Yahweh” in the first place, so their dishonesty about Hebrew Yods is incidental. A Yod alone won’t make names theophoric, regardless of how thoughtfully one fudges them.
People should question what the heck is a “Ya” and what manner of divinity selects such weird names, which amounts to one consonant in the Hebrew alphabet functioning as the name of this alleged deity. Ignorant Yahwists attempt to make the name YSHW (H3442) theophoric by placing an “A” following the Yod, turning it into Ya-shua with the definition “Ya saves.” YHWSHW doesn’t match the Savior’s name, so their best option is to transform Y’shua into Yashua and disregard Gabriel’s interpretation of Jeshua. Hebrew lovers overlook that the NT authors didn’t compose their masterpieces in Hebrew, although Yahus incorrectly assume that employing Hebrew rather than Greek/English makes names extra special. Worse yet, these students depend on Jewdified vowel pointers to pronounce Hebrew names.
Without vowels, the presumed tetragrammaton root words—H1943 and H1933—are indistinguishable, and along with the consonants YHW (יְהוֹ) and YH (יָּה), vowel pointers make a sizable difference when ascertaining their meaning. These common contractions aren’t Yahwistic if vowel patterns differ from the ones employed for YHWH (יְהֹוָה)—for example, the name YHWDH (יְהוּדָה / Y’hudah / Judah) starts with YHW (יְהוּ), but the Hebrew letter W (Vav) in the name Judah has a different vowel indicator compared to the tetragram’s Vav, making it non-Yahwistic. Yahwists debated in 1999 regarding Yahwistic names, which touched upon this.
The non-theophoric name YSHW (יֵשׁוּעַ / Y’shua / Jesus) doesn’t mean “Ya saves,” even with the first vowel substituted from an E (Yeshua) to an A (Yashua). The proper grammar function for Hebrew makes the Yod (Y) in YSHW mean “he shall,” and the remaining consonants (SHW) introduce the complete name: “he shall save.” Dr. Strong was accurate about the definition of this simple-to-understand name, making it appear he understood Hebrew; nonetheless, characters acting as Hebrew authorities—who don’t truly grasp this tongue—fabricate Yahwistic names from mere Yods. These types should cease professing to comprehend so much regarding a language they don’t know enough about to contrive such names.
A simple Yod doesn’t make names mean Ya and, therefore, Yahuwah—names including Yod prefixes are only Yahwistic when beginning with Yod-He-Vav (יְהוֹ) or Yod-Vav (יוֹ). Among the names holding a Yod prefix, which some Yahwists allege signify Yahwistic names, include Jeshua (יֵשׁוּעַ), Jacob (יַעֲקֹב), and Jerusalem (יְרוּשָׁלַם). Interestingly enough, Jonah (יוֹנָה) begins with Yod-Vav, but nowhere does it suggest this name is theophoric.
Strong’s H3123—allegedly meaning dove—is identical to Jonah (H3124) and employed thirty-two times throughout the OT. A massive fish swallowed Jonah—a “fishy” name that’s unusual to mean dove; all other names with Yod-Vav prefixes are supposedly Yahwistic and another word for dove in Hebrew is תסיל, which the Masoretic Text excludes. Verses introducing H3123 might denote a mistake Jewish scribes committed after modifying the name of whoever Jonah was. The MT utilizes “jonah”—with the theophoric YW prefix—for the word dove, yet Yod-Vav (יוֹ) seemingly indicates a shortened Yahwistic name, so this must be a screw-up that incompetent scribblers generated after changing the name of this prophet from a common name into a Yahwistic version.
No Hebrew lexicon implies that names starting with the Yod prefix—with no supplementary He-Vav or Vav—are Yahwistic; nevertheless, the Yahus will continue creating theophoric “Ya” names because of their emotional attachments to the tetragrammaton. The same is true for “Satan” and “Lucifer”—their fondness for such age-old myths has them believing a supernatural “fallen angel” from another dimension is the archenemy of mankind and conjecture this entity had intercourse with Eve in the Garden of Eden. Compelling evidence establishes Lucifer as a faulty translation applied to the Babylonian king in Isaiah Chapter XIV, who perished millennia ago. Centuries of brainwashing by the “Church” planted copious myths into credulous minds, which might be impossible to eradicate.
Because scribes blundered by forgetting to replace the name Vashni with Joel in 1st Chronicles 6:28, consider that the Abiah mentioned in this verse is an additional fabrication—the precise quantity of invented names will remain an inscrutability, although there must be a plethora.
H5146. Noach no’-akh the same as 5118; rest; Noach, the patriarch of the flood:–Noah.
H5118. nuwach noo’-akh or nowach {no’-akh}; from 5117; quiet:–rest(-ed, -ing place).
Some misinformed Yahwists said Noah (Noe) is Yahwistic, yet this name has no tetragram connections.
2 Samuel 8:17 “And Zadok the son of Ahitub, and Ahimelech the son of Abiathar, were the priests; and Seraiah was the scribe.”
2 Samuel 15:27 “The king said also unto Zadok the priest, Art not thou a seer? return into the city in peace, and your two sons with you, Ahimaaz thy son, and Jonathan [H3129] the son of Abiathar.”
The same verse introducing the Seraiah interpolation has a fabrication of the name Jonathan for Ahimelech in II Samuel Chapter XV, and this name (H3129) is possibly Yahwistic; however, no YH/YHW is present. Without deliberate efforts to substitute names, it seems improbable that one verse alone contains two names that scribes modified.
H3129. Yownathan yo-naw-thawn’ a form of 3083; Jonathan, the name of ten Israelites:–Jonathan.
H3083. Yhownathan yeh-ho-naw-thawn’ from 3068 and 5414; Jehovah-given; Jehonathan, the name of four Israelites:–Jonathan. Compare 3129.
Jehonathan (H3083) is Yahwistic, yet the names that don’t include the trigrammaton are questionable—those could be the real names, with the ones including Yod-He-Vav consisting of interpolations, or both might be Yahwistic variants. Jonathan (H3129) is undoubtedly Yahwistic since the evidence reveals this name as a forgery—one detail fabricated in Scripture is theophoric names.
1 Samuel 22:9 “Then answered Doeg the Edomite, which was set over the servants of Saul, and said, I saw the son of Jesse coming to Nob, to Ahimelech the son of Ahitub.”
1 Samuel 14:3 “And Ahiah, the son of Ahitub, Ichabod’s brother, the son of Phinehas, the son of Eli, the Lord’s priest in Shiloh, wearing an ephod. And the people knew not that Jonathan was gone.”
Ahimelech becomes Ahiah with this modification. Doeg the Edomite was a violent executioner for the wicked King Saul—when others refused orders to massacre Israelite priests, Saul could count on this alleged Esauite to murder them (1Sam 22:17-18). Brenton’s Septuagint mentions Doeg originating from Syria rather than Edom.
1 Samuel 26:6 “Then answered David and said to Ahimelech the Hittite, and to Abishai the son of Zeruiah, brother to Joab, saying, Who will go down with me to Saul to the camp? And Abishai said, I will go down with thee.”
2 Samuel 11:3 “And David sent and enquired after the woman. And one said, Is not this Bathsheba, the daughter of Eliam, the wife of Uriah the Hittite?”
This Ahimelech might not be Uriah, as they aren’t verifiably the same supposed “Hittite,” although both had close connections with King David, whose lust problems and subsequent wife-stealing trick got “Uriah” killed (2Sam 11). The Bible discusses three different Ahimelechs, and scribes altered their names—“Uriah” is an intentional substitution for Ahimelech.
Unquestionable editing of biblical names transpired, and this undeniable corruption means nobody can claim that Yahwistic names anywhere in the Bible are genuine—only liars assert that scribes never transformed non-Yahwistic names into theophoric variants. The detectable falsified names are scribal blunders from an extensive interpolation where mischievous editors missed names they ordinarily substituted with a Yahwistic version.
That Israelites held Yahwistic names when David breathed is doubtful—such names from that era are probable fabrications, as observable with several previously exposed as scriptural corruptions. Even following the life of David, scribes falsified plenteous names, making them theophoric to create enough window-dressing to show Yahweh as the God of Israel. Lying scribes made notable mistakes while modifying names, and the number of names made Yahwistic without leaving evidence behind is probably mind-boggling, especially preceding the adoption of Yahweh by the Israelites in the ninth century BC.
Theophoric names beginning with the Yod (Y) prefix always include Yod-He-Vav (YHW) or Yod-Vav (YW) for short, with one anomaly arising from Jonah (YWNH), a Yahwistic name starting with Yod-Vav that scribes fabricated. Jonah designates a shortened Yahwistic name with the YW prefix, but this name emerges throughout the Masoretic Text in thirty-two verses for the word dove, yet Jonah doesn’t mean dove unless YW prefixed names have the possibility of non-theophoric meanings. The MT is a Jewish translation with YHWH interpolated thousands of times—such heathens weren’t preserving names but faking them.
Deliberate undertakings to fabricate Yahwistic names occurred, with small amounts remaining in their original form. There weren’t efforts to transform names into ones having the theophoric “-el” element, only endeavors to modify them with the “-yah” and “yahu-” Yahwistic suffix and prefix—if such modifications are legitimate, at least one unexplained change would include the “-el” suffix.
The alleged reduced form of the Yahwistic prefix Yod-He-Vav (YHW) is Yod-Vav (YW)—one example is Jehonathan (YHW-NTHN), and the short form name Jonathan (YW-NTHN), with evidence this name is a fabrication (2Sam 8:17, 15:27). If Y-SHW (יֵשׁוּעַ) represented a compressed form of YHW-SHW (יְהוֹשׁוּעַ), it would be YW-SHW (יוֹשׁוּעַ) with the Yod-Vav prefix, like all other shortened Yahwistic names—Jacob (יַעֲקֹב) as Yahwistic would be יוֹעֲקֹב (short) and יְהוֹעֲקֹב (full). Y’shua (YSHW) is verifiably non-Yahwistic and means what Gabriel and James Strong explained. Yahwistic names include the YHW/YW prefix or YH suffix; however, those consonants aren’t always Yahwistic if the vowel pointers don’t match the tetragram, with the name Judah (YHWDH/Y’hudah) as one non-theophoric example commencing with Yod-He-Vav. A theophoric name starting with Yod is in complete form (YHW-) or short (YW-).
Jacob had his name legitimately changed to Israel (Gen 32:2), a theophoric name including the traditional “-el” suffix. Some assume Jacob might be Yahwistic—it begins with “Ja,” but students must examine Hebrew consonants to confirm such names. For instance, the root word of Y’shua is yasha (H3467) and translates as “Ya,” but yasha is a common verb. No Yahwistic names turned non-Yahwistic reside in Scripture—the evidence records the mysterious changes stem from non-Yahwistic names, not vice versa.
“… there are names compounded with Yahveh, which show that the possessors of them had lapsed into paganism: Bel-Yahu (‘Bel is Yahveh’), Nebo-Yah (‘Nebo is Yah’), Ya’a-Dagon (‘Yahveh is Dagon’), Nergal-edhir the son of Malaki-Ya’ava, and Dhabat-Issar (‘Good is Istar’) the daughter of Yaseh-Ya’ava. These names prove that besides Yahu and the contracted Yah, and Ya’a, the full form Ya’ava was also pronounced in compound names, though no traces of it now remain in our present Hebrew text of the Old Testament.”[12]
Archaeology confirms the names of Yahwists pagan—Israelite names found in Assyrian and Babylonian inscriptions reveal the recurring theme of Yahweh with an Astarte as manifested with Yaseh-Ya’ava’s daughter, Dhabat-Issar, meaning “Good is Istar.” The Yahwist named Bel-Yahu knew who YHWH was, for Bel (Baal) is assuredly Yahavah. The consensus is that the religion of the Israelites and Judahites was “pagan Yahwism,” meaning they paganized the God of Jacob rather than forsaking Him and whoring after Baalim. The Bible disagrees with such assumptions; however, Satan deceived the Yahus by injecting the tetragrammaton and assorted contractions.
No full tetragram (Ya’ava) names uncovered by archaeologists are present in the Hebrew text because the Yahwistic names in biblical manuscripts are mostly falsifications and errors of tradition. Discoveries exhibit names with the entire “Four Letters,” making it peculiar that the whole form isn’t in scriptural names—interpolators determined only to inject the YHW/YW prefix and YH suffix while transforming names, although -YHWH accompanies Israelitish names in the historical record.
Editors didn’t know that theophoric names utilizing the complete name of YHWH existed when they replaced non-Yahwistic names with Yahwistic interpolations. Only three theophoric contractions exist in the rabbinical translations of Scripture: YHW-, YW-, and -YH. Names showing the suffix “-YHWH” are nonexistent except in archaeological finds, which uncover strange divinities and idolatry—Yahweh connected with paganism is standard, excluding small amounts of the findings not manifesting conclusive links to foreign deities at first glance like those scrolls unearthed at Ketef Hinnom that glorify a Baal named Yahweh (1Ki 7:51, 15:15; 2Chr 24:7). Names prefixed with -YHWH discovered in excavations never materialize in biblical names—one discrepancy out of too many involving the tetragrammaton cult and their false god.
The Istarati are the Ishtars/Istars and identical to the Ashtars/Astartes/Ashtaroth. Yaseh-Ya’ava named his daughter after an Astarte, and the Baal (husband) of this Astarte was Ya’ava—a strange name that fits perfectly for a fictitious deity to have as their “proper name.” The Israelites didn’t paganize the God of Jacob and instead replaced Him with alien gods, but Yahwists trusted the scribes who interpolated YHWH into biblical manuscripts over what Scripture declares. These Yahus should allow someone reasonable—who knows better than to trust Jewish trickery—to unravel God’s names instead of swallowing the lies of Satan, which “deceiveth the whole world” (Rev 12:9).
Brain-dead parrots without investigative capabilities persist—these birds swallow the tetragram falsifications and refuse veterinary treatment. Their deceptions are plentiful, so don’t assume Yahwists only mislead about the Creator’s names, for they deceive on many subjects, including the mythical fallen archangel Lucifer, AKA Satan.
Assyrian and Babylonian transcriptions supposedly have methods to distinguish vowels, making Yahavah resemble a more accurate rendering of the tetragrammaton, which doesn’t skip vowels in hovah (H1943). Yahwists are clumsy enough to mispronounce and misspell the name of their fraudulent god. Many Yahus accept the tetragram because they despise the name Lord Jesus Christ—like the antichrist Jews. Enlightening shills about the “sacred name” rubbish won’t change anything, but at least their deceptions are detectable, making it challenging to camouflage themselves indefinitely. Perhaps “Yahweh” sounds less weird than “Yahavah” to some Yahus, but Yahweh as an authentic pronunciation isn’t possible—theophoric names employing the complete form of YHWH with supposed vowels substantiate this. Yahwists should either correctly pronounce their false divinity’s name or repudiate the “Four Letters” altogether.
The ASHRH/asherahs are groves of the ASHTRTH/Ashtoreths, and Yahweh is Baal, meaning Jeroboam’s golden calves weren’t Baalim and Ashtaroth; nevertheless, YHWH and ASHRTH are bovine deities the Jacobites worshiped. A Yahwistic name suggests that YHW/YW/YH isn’t pointing to YHWH as a contraction, the possessors received it at birth from idolatrous parents or changed their names to exalt a false deity, or wicked scribes modified it. The Hebrew equivalent of Iesous the Christ is YSHW/Y’shua, which doesn’t mention the Creator’s alleged name, YHWH—these oversights, with distinct versions of a name that exclude Yahu, confirm tampering occurred on biblical names. To determine the correct name, examine G2424, taken from H3442 (YSHW), which God’s inspired messengers wrote in the New Testament. Rebels interpolated Yahushua (YHWSHW)—a Yahwistic pseudo-name—into the Hebrew scriptures.
Unscrupulous scribes who copied religious manuscripts contrived eight or more Yahwistic names—too large an amount not to contemplate that many additional theophoric fabrications defile the biblical texts. Understanding that YHWSHW and YSHW comprise different names with separate meanings is key to unlocking the secret of the Yahwist cult by revealing that since YSHW isn’t Yahwistic, one of these names is spurious. With many other theophoric names exposed as interpolations, keen students will doubt the authenticity of YHWSHW, especially since Gabriel interpreted the meaning of YSHW, and Hebrew scholars explained this name isn’t Yahwistic. To connect the name Jesus with the tetragrammaton, Yahwists make YSHW mean “Ya saves,” but the Yod in the name Y’shua is non-Yahwistic—Yahus won’t admit this because the testimony that Jesus of Nazareth (Act 4:10-12) is the only saving name invalidates their sacred name hypotheses.
Even the detestable Queen Jezebel—who imported foreign divinities into the kingdom of Israel—had a daughter with the YH suffix in her name, and this Baalim and Ashtaroth worshiping woman wasn’t a lover of the Almighty (2Ki 8:18; 2Chr 21:6). Ahab and Jezebel naming their child after the purported God of Jacob is unusual, as they renounced the Lord for Baal and Ashtoreth, including their entire nation, other than small pockets of Israelites—it seems doubtful they kept the Maker’s alleged name around and named their children after Him after this forsaking, especially with broads like Jezebel in charge, who figuratively wore the pants (1Ki 21:25), but Ahab was, similarly, corrupt (1Ki 16:30-33). Jezebel’s daughter, Athaliah, followed her mother’s example by establishing Baal worship in Judah and performing murderous deeds (2Ki 11:1; 2Chr 22:10)—like Jezebel, this Baal-worshiper named her children with Yod-He contractions.
The “-iah” suffix has a strong possibility of comprising a tetragram contraction, but countless Bible characters don’t have names beginning with YHW (Jeho-) nor ending with YH (-jah / –iah)—many prophets, kings, seers, priests, and angels didn’t possess Yahwistic names. Theophoric names with the “-el” suffix mean the possessors dedicated themselves to El (God) rather than Yahu. Only sometimes do Yahwistic elements emerge in the names of biblical figures, and the “-iah” suffix didn’t surface until long into the Bible story—probably after King David. The original manuscripts are missing, so the precise time theophoric names ending with the YH suffix materialized isn’t ascertainable. For excellent reasons, Solomon and David didn’t have Yahwistic names, although the scribes substituted the name of someone close to David with a theophoric fabrication.
Either Yod-He (YH) isn’t a contraction of YHWH, or scoundrels compiled a list of names to modify with YH/YHW/YW injected into them to make their tetragrammaton interpolations appear authentic. Alternatively, perhaps those consonants are reductions of YHWH, and Yahu was Israel’s foremost false god, with the Yahwistic names of Israelites reflecting this change in gods. There could be multiple possibilities, such as “-iah” indicating a foreign divinity many Jacobites named their children after, with malicious scribes further altering the names of biblical characters by inserting theophoric contractions into their names.
2 Chronicles 24:7 “For the sons of Athaliah, that wicked woman, had broken up the house of God; and also all the dedicated things of the house of the Lord did they bestow upon Baalim.”
2 Chronicles 22:12 “And he was with them hid in the house of God six years: and Athaliah reigned over the land.”
Athaliah and Jezebel supposedly named their children with an “-iah” suffix—scriptural names aren’t trustworthy, and this untrustworthiness is noticeable in the plethora of fabricated names scattered throughout the Bible. Yahus contend that YHWH is legitimate, and LORD is the interpolation, although Shelahite-Canaanites and Edomite-Shelahites (Ashkenazim)—AKA the “Jews”—had much involvement with the fraudulent translations where the tetragram is ubiquitous, and all that remains are copies of the original biblical texts.
1 Kings 7:51 “… Solomon brought in the things which David his father had dedicated; even the silver, and the gold, and the vessels, did he put among the treasures of the house of the Lord.”
1 Kings 15:15 “And he brought in the things which his father had dedicated, and the things which himself had dedicated, into the house of the Lord, silver, and gold, and vessels.”
Athaliah’s royal descendants acquired all precious metals from the house of God and bestowed them upon the Baals (2Chr 24:7)—thus came the creation of the silver Hinnom amulets displaying the tetragrammaton.
Israel and Judah weren’t faithful followers of the God of Jacob—with situations sufficiently corrupted, the Lord brought them into bondage, with the ultimate catastrophe coming upon their nations through the Assyrians and Babylonians. Near these final endings, tetragram usage was standard, and the Almighty’s infuriation with His people was intense enough to destroy their kingdoms. YHWH accompanied a goddess, but Israel didn’t worship the Lord alongside an Astarte—they forsook their God.
The Ketef Hinnom amulets are connectable to strange gods—among the dedicated things from God’s house was a surplus of silver, and Judah bestowed it upon the Baals, so it doesn’t require much of an investigator to comprehend these silver artifacts have the name of a Baal engraved on them. Those scrolls only verify that “Yahweh” is a false deity, irrespective of whether the engravings resemble some scriptural verses—the Bible doesn’t state the Judahites granted some silver to the Baals, but all accumulated silver in the house of God. Judah created the Hinnom amulets during the abandonment and literal replacement of the Almighty with alien deities—every tetragrammaton discovery is idolatrous and linkable to Baalim. Yahweh is only “Most High” of the dung-gods, although Kemosh kicked his arse, so perhaps YHWH isn’t the chief of Baalim but a whelp and upstart amongst the false divinities.
Once upon a time, only seven thousand Israelites didn’t worship Baalim and Ashtaroth, and idolaters demolished the Almighty’s altars and murdered prophets—when the Sovereign God overthrew their kingdoms, that number was much smaller. Israel renounced the Lord and embraced fictitious gods; ergo, YHWH with a consort—manifested in four discoveries—reveals “Yahweh” was a strange divinity. While worshiping Baalim and Ashtaroth, the Israelites served not Him (Jdg 10:6; 1Sam 12:10)—they didn’t venerate the Creator’s alleged name together with Astartes like ASHRTH. Jacobites rejected their Deity throughout the time of Jezebel and did likewise near their concluding captivity, which didn’t involve customizing the Divine by providing Him an Ashtoreth but worshiping imaginary gods and goddesses.
Ahab’s son (Jehoram), Jezebel’s daughter (Athaliah), and Athaliah’s child (Ahaziah) had Yahwistic names, but these villains made Baalim and Ashtaroth their national gods, with Athaliah’s descendants bestowing all “dedicated things” upon the Baals. It seems unrealistic that such maniacs gave their infants honorary Yahwistic names unless Yahweh isn’t the God of Abraham—such names are always suspect. Wacky theophoric names—imagined, interpolated, and even authentic—make Yahweh appear as the “Most High.”
Yahwists have no concrete links between the Almighty and the tetragram, and ample evidence reveals inconsistencies and other flaws in their “sacred name” postulations. Archeological data shows an abundance of Yahwistic names and tetragrammaton usage directly before the Assyrian and Babylonian captivities when the Lord despised the Baal worship enough to destroy the kingdoms of Israel and Judah. Israelites replaced their Divinity with alien ones and would more likely name their younglings after their nation’s supreme pseudo-deity rather than the supposed name of the God they abandoned (YHWH).
Corruptions of the biblical text occurred—Canaanites, Edomites, and even wicked Whites like Athaliah are suspects. The name Athaliah and that of her son, Ahaziah, are possible fabrications; conversely, as real names of individuals who once existed—and assuming “-iah” is a Yahwistic contraction—all it shows is the false deity these roguish folk had. The Septuagint could contain corrections to interpolations that happened to copies of the original manuscripts, with tetragram removal as the major advancement in legitimate LXX versions, although some falsely claim the oldest Greek OT contained the consonants YHWH. Fragments of destroyed LXX texts—allegedly from the first century AD—surfaced south of Qumran in the Nahal Hever cave and include the Phoenician tetragrammaton; however, the same doubt plaguing the authenticity of the Qumran scrolls applies to the ones unearthed at Nahal Hever. The manuscripts God preserved—the Codex Vaticanus and Codex Sinaiticus, two complete copies of the LXX—don’t mention Yahweh, like the New Testament. YHWH appearing on unpreserved/fragmentary scrolls at Nahal and Qumran means little—those “discoveries” are the compositions of mongrelized Jews and other nefarious scribes, which scammers planted in the desert for a “miraculous” find.
The only scriptural texts safeguarded by God are the Greek scrolls that—not so surprisingly—don’t contain the tetragram. Some insist the Masoretic Text is a reconstruction of the Aramaic-Babylonian manuscripts of 300 BC, yet no preserved “Hebrew” translations existed when Jewry developed their modern “Hebraic” interpretation of 1000 AD. What the Jews formulated their corrupted translation from is debatable—it was probably Greek manuscripts.
“The success of Sennacherib along the coast, and the failure of Egyptian aid, now brought nearly the whole of Palestine to his feet and the various rulers; sent envoys with tribute, and tokens of submission to present before the Assyrian monarch. Menahem who ruled at Samsi-Merom, Tubahal the newly-made king of Zidon, Abdilihiti king of Arvad, Uru-melek. king of Gebal, Metinti king of Ashdod, and Puduil king of the Ammonites, Kemosh-nadbi king of the Moabites, and Yarammu king of Edom, now made their peace, and Askelon, Ekron, and Judah alone remained in rebellion. Sennacherib started from Akku, and, keeping along the coast, invaded Askelon, and capturing Zidqa, the revolting king, sent him, his wife, his sons and daughters, his brothers and other relatives, captive to Assyria.”[11]
This Akkadian discovery documents an Esaurian ruler named Joram/Ya-rammu, a Yahwistic name starting with YW that interpreters incorrectly rendered as Malik-rammu—an Edomite king with such a name indicates that countless Esauites possessed them.
The Israelites and Edomites have records of rivalry and conflict; however, they once maintained an alliance to combat enemies (2Ki 3:1-21), and corrupt Israelite kings apparently hired Esauites to slaughter the innocent (1Sa 22:17-18), although the LXX mentions this supposed Edomite as a Syrian. Edom/Teman worshiped Yahweh simultaneously with an Astarte, and an Edomic ruler beared a name beginning with Ya that has striking similarities to the name Joram/Jehoram; moreover, the Shasu tribes of Edom had a place named after Yahu in the fourteenth century BC.
Edom had gods of their own and comprised the adversaries of Israel, yet they purportedly adopted the alleged God of Jacob-Israel (YHWH) from the Jacobites. The histories of Jacob’s spiritual whoredom with foreign deities suggest that the Israelites more convincingly obtained YHWH from Esau-Edom. The Almighty never discusses the Edomites positively and promises death to them and all other heathens who despise His people (Oba 1:15-16). The Lord threatened to deliver Judah into their enemies’ hands for seeking after Esau’s gods (2Chr 25:20) and followed through with the Babylonian captivity.
Elijah (אֵלִיָּה) ends with the assumed Yahwistic consonants Yod-He (יָּה)—this Yahwistic version of Eliel occurs once for a prophet, and lying scribes altered this name or his parents with Baal-worshiping tendencies bestowed it. Names such as Israyah, Gabriyah, and Emmanuyah don’t exist except with the theophoric meaning of “-el” (God). Few names incorporating the “-el” suffix have variants that include the “yahu” element―other than “Elijah”―who appeared after those biblical characters named Eliel died, and Michayah (2Ki 22:12; Neh 12:35, 41).
Few “tetragrammaton” discoveries surfaced; nonetheless, Edom shows up in three, and the engravings are always pagan or connected to false deities. Historical data reveals YHWH could only be an interpolation, and Scripture warns about lying scribes:
“How will ye say, We are wise, and the law of the Lord is with us? In vain have the scribes used a false pen.” – Jeremias 8:8, Brenton LXX
The tongue used by Babylonian mongrels (H4464) and modified by mongrelized Jews isn’t a pure language. Jewry mucked with the Hebrew vowel placements; moreover, the OT verses excerpted by NT authors originated from Greek documents. Judahites possibly adopted the Aramaic-Chaldean language while in Babylonian custody, which wasn’t their Phoenician mother tongue—Aramaic in the square script is “Biblical Hebrew” and differs substantially from Paleo-Hebrew. Pure-blooded Semites invented the “Proto-Canaanite” script―a language practiced by Judah preceding their captivity―for which nobody positively knows the vowel pointers; hence, using “Old Hebrew” is also pointless.
Yahwists speculate how to pronounce YHWH and―as with other Hebrew words―utilize “Jewish” vowel guesswork to attempt vocalizing it. Yahweh might not be a Jewish guess, as hundreds of conjectures exist; nevertheless, it comprises a presumption that omits one vowel in the word hovah (H1943). Only yahoos believe Yahwistic interpolations are trustworthy and create speculations on how to utter a fictional “personal name” for the Lord God.
Exodus Chapter III mentions no “proper name” of God like humans receive, but an appellation functioning as a name—a title occurs for the Creator’s names in every scriptural instance. Regardless that Jewry tampered with the manuscripts to interpolate their superstitious tetragrammaton, the Almighty’s “names” functioning as titles don’t magically change in Exodus, for God’s Word is consistent—the name the Father wants in remembrance eternally isn’t “Yahweh.”
The God of Israel doesn’t have names that require guesses! Yahus have “four letters” for their deity’s name, without solid pronunciations nor interpretations—attempts to vocalize YHWH are ridiculous assumptions, which frequently change from one Yahwist to another. The All-Powerful didn’t present His people with a name to remain in memory forever that they can’t vocalize because everyone forgot the articulation or what it positively means. Yahwists cannot prove they have the meaning of His alleged name correct, and these guessers don’t esteem the ultimate source of the tetragram—the Masoretes—who connected YHWH to H1943 instead of H1933.
Like the hundreds of weird, conjectured vocalizations, dozens of speculations surround the tetragram’s meaning. Some brainstorm wild suppositions about “I am who I am”—whatever this was in original manuscripts—to connect YHWH with HYH (H1961), while others identify the HWH in YHWH with H1933. The word that Jewish Masoretes connected YHWH to remains the definition most unconsidered—most Yahus don’t want their divinity linked to H1943. If the Lord God provided a “name” to memorialize, it wouldn’t demand guesses to utter, conjectures to understand, and receive an exclusion from the Greek Testaments. Yahweh is only present in biblical texts scribed by Jewry, like the Masoretic Text, which Hebrewists composed about a thousand years after the New Testament’s composition.
Only strange gods have personal names requiring conjectures to pronounce and understand meanings. The Almighty doesn’t divulge names that His people are to commemorate forever, which nobody can remember other than through four uppercase letters, resulting in a profusion of guesses on how to enunciate it and what it means. Some guessers attempt to resemble elite prophets who comprehend the secrets of this alleged “Ultra Name,” and carrying such attitudes is dangerous (Deu 18:20). When one assembly declares the pronunciation a particular way, another shall swear the vocalization is their way instead, with possibly a different meaning—such congregations are speculating, and those declaring otherwise are dishonest. YHWH results from manuscript interpolations and deity replacements; therefore, Christians needn’t formulate opinions regarding the tetragrammaton.
Some Yahwists claim that “Jewish” people don’t pronounce the tetragram since “Jews” are diabolical entities without natural abilities to articulate this assumed “Mega Name.” Other Yahus don’t guess vocalizations but insert YHWH into their writings—they seemingly don’t comprehend the magical utterance, yet the “Four Letters” are satisfactory enough for them; such Yahwists probably realize the pronunciation is unascertainable because nobody knows how the ancient Israelite idolaters pronounced their false deity’s name.
The Maker’s memorial name is to remain in remembrance forever rather than require speculations, although many Yahus profess to hold the correct articulation and meaning of YHWH—they understand zilch and enjoy making conjectures for pride-boosting purposes, and considering that “the Name” is guesswork, folks can’t believe what Yahus allege. Yahwists who don’t pretend to know the “secret” and, consequently, refuse to make guesses shouldn’t criticize “Jews” for not vocalizing it, as though this implies we should since they purportedly do not. Assertions that Jewry doesn’t vocalize the tetragram aren’t even factual; websites exist where ethnic “Jews” employ utterances for it. The claim is misleading—just because some decline to utter “Yahweh” doesn’t determine that “Jews” don’t recognize the “Four Letters” as the Divine’s name.
The Talmud lists the punishment for blaspheming the Ineffable Name of God as death … In Jewish law the only form of blasphemy which is punishable by death is blaspheming the Ineffable Name [that rabbis interpolated].[15]
That’s one reason Jewry avoids pronouncing the tetragrammaton, which doesn’t belong in Scripture—the “Four Letters” are their scribal injections representing the name of their “ineffable” false god.
“The most important and most often written name of God in Judaism is the Tetragrammaton, the four-letter name of God … the correct pronunciation of this name has been lost—the original Hebrew texts only included consonants. Some scholars conject that it was pronounced ‘Yahweh’, but some suggest that it never had a pronunciation (which is extremely unlikely given that it is found as an element in numerous Hebrew names) … In English it is written as YHWH, YHVH, or JHVH depending on the transliteration convention that is used. The Tetragrammaton was written in contrasting Paleo-Hebrew characters in some of the oldest surviving square Aramaic Hebrew texts [the fraudlent DDS scrolls] … The prohibition of blasphemy, for which capital punishment is prescribed in Jewish law, refers only to the Tetragrammaton (Soferim iv., end; comp. Sanh. 66a).
All modern denominations of Judaism teach that the four letter name of God, YHWH, is forbidden to be uttered except by the High Priest, in the Temple. Since the Temple in Jerusalem no longer exists, this name is never said in religious rituals by Jews. Orthodox and Conservative Jews never pronounce it for any reason. Some religious non-Orthodox Jews are willing to pronounce it, but for educational purposes only, and never in casual conversation or in prayer.”[16]
Yahveh is as Jewish as bagels and gefilte fish:
“If you are interested in a study of the many sacred names which the Jewish mystics use, I would recommend a book, Gates of Light, by Rabbi Joseph Gikatilla, who was born in 1248AD. The book was published in 1994 as one of the Bronfman Library of Jewish Classics. Here are a few quotes from the book.
‘Gates of Light is an encyclopaedia of God’s Names as well as a map which reveals the connections between the words in the Torah and the Names of God.’ (p.xvii)
‘The ineffable Name YHVH represents God’s core and proves God’s unmediated link between His core and the Jewish people.’ (p. xix)
‘The one who knows which Name of God to petition for what he wishes is like one who has the proverbial keys to the kingdom.’ (p. xx)
‘… those who want their needs fulfilled by employing the Holy Names should try with all their strength to comprehend the meaning of each Name of God as they are recorded in the Torah, names such as EHYE, YH, YHVH, AdoNaY, EL, ELOH, EloHIM, ShaDaY, TZVAOT. One should be aware that all the names mentioned in the Torah are the keys for anything a person needs in the world.’ (p.5)
‘… you need to know that there are fifty-four quadriliteral Names connected to YHVH which add up to two hundred and sixteen letters. These fifty-four Names contain the secret for drawing from the power of all that exists in the world; they are like the soul of the two hundred and sixteen letters which are contained in the verses [of Exodus 14:19-21]. Everything created is included in these fifty-four Names, and these Names are the means for fulfilling the needs of every creature through the intercession of AdoNaY.’ (p. 15)
Well, that should give you some idea of what the sacred names mean to the Edomite Jews, even still today.”[14]
Yahwists praise a conjectured name that must receive remembrance eternally, and the Lord hates the tribe responsible for composing the documents where this name shines. Usage of the Hebrew consonants YHWH alone occurs from the brighter individuals who admit they don’t comprehend the pronunciation, and Yahweh—together with myriad other guesses—comes from Yahus who believe they can authoritatively pronounce YHVH, as they comprise the special people appointed by the Lord to deliver the message of a deplorable guess name for God.
No plot existed to conceal the tetragram by erasing it from the Scriptures—the wicked hatched a conspiracy to change the Creator’s name to that of a false deity. The endeavor to replace God’s authority and identity endures, and the conspirators slithered into countless Christian organizations. Yahwists should question why antichrist Jewry didn’t exclude YHWH from their translations if a scheme to remove this name from the Bible transpired. The “Four Letters” are only in the scriptural texts of mongrels, and Jews held connections to the tetragrammaton for millennia; however, not all Jewish people pronounce it, as most are intelligent enough to realize the pronunciation is indeterminable—pretty odd for a memorial name. Yahwistic cultists afflicted Christianity after Jewish scoundrels “infiltrated” it, and where Jews go, so goes their “bull” (Yahweh).
Simply because the tetragram dominates “Jewish” scrolls doesn’t make YHWH the God of Israel. Yahwists believe the deceitful penmanship of Jewish scribes and create bizarre theories as to why the Greek translations exclude the “Four Letters.” The conspiracy alleges that Satan—a Christian hoax—removed the tetragrammaton from Greek documents; however, the Devil composed the Hebrew translations. “Jews” are collectively this “satan” (adversary), although such bipeds aren’t the only adversaries. The conspiracy was so clumsy that even “Satan” himself neglected to eliminate God’s alleged name from their manuscripts.
A mongrel dialect called “Hebrew,” originating from the Babylonian captivity—which Jews had their contemptible hands on—shouldn’t replace English. Why the Yahus imagine a Babylonian tongue is so magnificent to develop weird names for Jesus and Lord utilizing this language is puzzling—Jesus is an English translation of the Greek name Iesous, and Christians should recognize the authority of the Lord Jesus, regardless of Yahwist heresies, which convince folks to utilize fabricated names. Don’t trust Yahwists who use the name Jesus Christ but also profess to know the “real” names since they don’t understand what they speak about after feasting on manure—those who assert this cherish the real (evil) names, and even if not publicly reiterating them, they do so in secret, proving their delusion.
Matthew 23:39 “… Blessed is he that cometh in the name of the Lord.”
1 Corinthians 6:11 “… but ye are washed, but ye are sanctified, but ye are justified in the name of the Lord Jesus, and by the Spirit of our God.”
Corinthians doesn’t speak about “Yahuwah Yahushua”—or other laughable names—justifying Christians; instead, it provides the excellent name of the Lord Jesus. That mongrel Babylonian-Aramaic dialect Jewry mucked with by implementing their conjectured vowel pointers is undesirable. The Hebrew tongue is Aramaic in square form, and Judahites didn’t practice this language preceding their captivity; nevertheless, Yahwists perceive excellency in this strange tongue, influencing them to concoct outlandish names for God and shun the correct ones. The Lord had the Old and New Testaments preserved in Greek, and the Hebrew scriptures rested in accursed hands, with the Masoretic Text—displaying the tetragram throughout—as a well-known example. The Septuagint isn’t perfect; however, NT composers utilized this translation to formulate their manuscripts.
Ezekiel 4:12-13 “And thou shalt eat it as barley cakes, and thou shalt bake it with dung that cometh out of man, in their sight. And the Lord said, Even thus shall the children of Israel eat their defiled bread among the Gentiles, whither I will drive them.”
Yahwists collected some “Jew” poo and feasted on it—unpleasant odors proceed from their mouths, and brownish leftovers now cover their faces after swallowing the Jewish treat, which doesn’t make for pleasant company.
Even the shallowest individuals can understand Yahweh isn’t God with the available data—some Yahus might arrive at the same conclusion, but the Lord already deluded the majority (2Thes 2:10-12). YHWH will continue as the deity of delusional Yahwists; otherwise, the Lord wouldn’t deceive these souls into worshiping the name of an alien deity and spreading the lie. God-given delusions cause Yahus to accept the tetragrammaton, although intentional deceivers persist, and people typically parrot information without investigating the facts. The evidence shows “Yahweh” as a strange deity interpolated into scriptural manuscripts; ergo, only parrots and manifest deceivers would exalt YHWH as the God of Jacob—trusting these types on additional subjects isn’t advisable.
Yahweh, Satan, Michael the Archangel, Lucifer, and the Antichrist have something in common: they comprise abominable fantasies. The truth won’t advance to predetermined outcomes while the Yahwists deceive, and the same applies to believers in “Satan”—another myth straight from the depths of “Hell.” Christians can place confidence in understanding that “Lucifer” doesn’t exist and “Yahweh” isn’t God. The antichrist and the adversary (satan) constitute collectives, although singular “satans” and antichrists breathe; Lucifer was a human Babylonian tyrant; Michael the Archangel is the Lord Jesus Christ; and Yahweh is an incorrect pronunciation of a strange deity’s name, with much data connecting this “god” to Esau, such as three discoveries that connect Edom with YHWH/YHW, and the fact Jewry interpolated the tetragrammaton into the MT and Qumran Scrolls.
On top of the archeological data exposing the tetragrammaton, the New Testament contradicts Yahwists by declaring Jesus of Nazareth is the peerless name (Act 4:10-12) and that the name of the Lord Jesus justifies Christians (1Cor 6:11). YHWSHW (Yahushua) is an interpolation of rabbinical scribblers—evidence reveals YSHW as the authentic name. The Yod prefix in YSHW (Y’shua/H3442) is a formative Hebrew verb conjugation and indicates a third person, future tense, i.e., “He will/shall.” H3442 originates from the verb yasha (H3467), and the “ya” in this word is non-Yahwistic. The Tetragrammaton Deception (TTD) confirms Jesus’ name isn’t Yahwistic, notwithstanding the fruitless endeavors to pervert it into one by Yahus with inclinations to fabricate names; hence, nobody must accept YHWH as authentic.
To assume no corruption happened to the biblical texts is absurd, and the New Testament isn’t infallible, as uninspired insertions lurk within it. Eight or more Yahwistic names are visible outcomes of unexplained name replacements—a disturbing amount of alterations; to believe this limited in scope to the verifiable falsifications is ridiculous. Names shown modified to become theophoric are from a lousy interpolation job, and the earliest manuscripts are missing, meaning humanity shall never know how many Yahwistic names are genuine. Jewry destroyed biblical scrolls after producing copies—only devils with something to conceal would arrange this.
H1943 (hovah) isn’t convincingly the proper expression for YHWH—Strong’s H1933 (havah) seems more reasonable since the Yods supposedly only find application with verbs, and H1943 is a feminine noun. Assuming H1933 is the correct tetragram source word, multiple conjectures exist regarding Y’havah’s interpretation, but the name indicates, “He will/shall” do whatever one paraphrases H1933, which has several definitions. Going from H1943 to H1933 offers nothing encouraging to Yahwist factions—further speculations with havah as the source word are all that happens.
Remember when we place a “yod” (or a “Y”) before a Hebrew VERB (or action) we are indicating that one will do or is doing the action (a simpler way to understanding the third person imperfect verb). Since this ONLY applies to VERBS, it is impossible for the feminine noun (hawah), which means “calamity”, to be prefixed with “yod” and preserve its meaning – it would change the word ENTIRELY. There is NO SUCH THING as a “yod” prefix in nouns; therefore, not ONLY does YHWH NOT contain the feminine noun (hawah), the noun HWH itself would be meaningless if prefixed by a “yod” (or a “Y”). In Hebrew there are RULES which apply to nouns and RULES which apply to verbs. These rules help us to identify the meaning of words and how they are being used – when we do not learn these rules and are subjected to teachers who do not understand these rules we run the risk of making erroneous assumptions like these.[13]
A sheeny named Obadyah Benyamin composed the preceding quotation—his name resembles something a mamzer would possess, so he’s probably Jewish. Anyway, this potential Jew, in his pathetic Yahwistic justifications, declares that Yod prefixes with nouns are invalid—indeed, formal explanations for Yods stemming from noun root words are lacking. Obadyah guesses a tetragram articulation utilizing Strong’s H1933 in his insufficient rebuttal. (Update 9/20/2018: Searching for his pseudonym validates this biped is a hybrid of the “Black Hebrew Israelite” persuasion—a Negroid involved in identity theft embraces Yahawah.)
Assuming that nouns combined with Yod prefixes are faulty Hebrew, Joel is (H3100) an impossible name—the root word is a noun, and it commences with a Yud, suggesting this name is an evident interpolation; moreover, evidence shows a name transformation from Vashni to Joel (1Chr 6:28; 1Sam 8:2), making Joel appear further fabricated. Another impossibility for a Yahwistic name is Jehoash (H3060), originating from the noun H784; likewise, if Jehovah stems from H1943, it would be seemingly improbable. The only method for Yahwists to make Jehovah authentic is by connecting it to the verb H1933—the tetragram would be grammatically impossible without it. Joel, Jehoash, and Jehovah are problematic because of alleged Hebrew grammar rules—regardless of what Hebrewists contend, these names demonstrate Yod prefixes combined with nouns aren’t incompatible. If not harmonious, it suggests these Yod-prefixed names are the fabrications of blunderous scribes.
Another “fishy” name, Jonah, allegedly comes from a noun; however, the concordance explains that it “probably” stems from H3196. Jonah makes little sense—no way does it mean “dove.” Concordances and lexicons don’t provide definitive answers concerning its source word, other than the doubtful explanation that Jonah means dove since the Masoretic Text erroneously applies this word thirty-two times when discussing doves. Jonah consists of a screw-up that Jews fabricated—they utilized a theophoric name for the actual Hebrew word for dove (תסיל). Jonah indicates a Yahwistic name with the Yod-Vav (יוֹ) prefix, but the anomaly is this name makes no sense and presumably originates from a noun. People assume Jonah has the meaning of “dove” because of its questionable use dozens of times elsewhere when mentioning these birds.
Only dishonest and egotistical people believe they comprehend the meaning of YHWH and how to articulate it—some Yahwists are reasonable and acknowledge its vocalization isn’t ascertainable. Considering this, the Lord declares in Exodus that His name shall be in memorial permanently, but because nobody understands the tetragram’s meaning nor its pronunciation, it makes no sense that Yahweh could be a name for God. The Lord’s names include titles in every additional instance, showing irregularities with the presumed “sacred name” interpolated in Exodus. This anomaly deviates from the overall consistent Scriptural flow, as all other divine “names” feature titles, except for an ineffable guess name that must receive remembrance forever, which isn’t His name if folks can’t remember it sufficiently to pronounce and understand the meaning.
Endnotes:
[1] Translation from Aḥituv, Shmuel. Echoes from the Past. Jerusalem: CARTA Jerusalem, 2008, pg. 60.
[2] Keel, Othmar, and Uehlinger, Christoph, Gods, goddesses, and images of God in ancient Israel (Fortress Press, 1998) p.239.
[3] http://www.lebtahor.com/Archaeology/inscriptions/khirbet%20el%20qom%20tomb%20inscription.htm.
[4] Anchor Bible Dictionary, Asherah: Goddess of Israel, New Encyclopedia of Archaeological Excavations in the Holy Land.
[5] http://lloydthomas.org/1-IsraelTimeLine/2-MosesManasseh/MeshaStele.html.
[6] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ketef_Hinnom.
[7] Anat-Yahu and the Jews of Elephantine, M.E. Mondriaan, p. 545.
[8] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anat
[9] History of Egypt, Chaldæa, Syria, Babylonia, and Assyria, Volume 4 (of 12).
[10] Proceedings of the Society of Biblical Archaeology, Volumes 7-8.
[11] Ancient History from the Monuments. Assyria from the Earliest Times to the Fall of Nineveh by George Smith.
[12] The Expository Times, Volume 7, page 266.
[13] http://amaremet.com/wp-content/uploads/Studies/YEHOWAH.pdf
[14] https://remnantradio.org/Archives/articles/sacred_name.htm.
[15] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seven_Laws_of_Noah.
[16] https://www.cs.mcgill.ca/~rwest/wikispeedia/wpcd/wp/n/Names_of_God_in_Judaism.htm
Categories
Steven's WordPress Blog 
Impressive research!
I stumbled into CI but became quickly concerned as I was being pressured to “speak” a certain way. You must not say, “Jesus,” they would say. The pressure and fear tactics were tremendous, and I’m glad I had the intuition to distance myself from such people.
Anyway………impressive research.
Christians who appreciate the Creator’s wisdom are valuable—their comments shall receive authorization. Positive feedback offers encouragement, although excessive praise becomes worrisome.
Children of the Light embrace the truth, even when extreme. Still, my conclusion is that if people don’t generally ignore me or get upset, I’ve potentially done something wrong. However, not everyone despises accurate reports or suffers from cowardice—God-fearing men remain within this satanic realm.
Do you have a personal Email we could dialogue on?
I wanted to pick your brain on Eschatology but didn’t want to post an unrelated topic on your website. Thanks, Roy
sas 0819 at live dot com
Great work! BTW, do you consider the protocols to be authentic? If you do, then could you explain what they mean with protocol no. 14.
Sorry if I’m off-topic and spell horribly, but I just want to hear from someone like you on this. Wish you a great day! : )
This quote suggests Jewry prefers to keep “religious” matters confidential so outsiders understand less about their Talmudic crime syndicate. Jews are a minuscule minority and utilize subterfuge by necessity—Jewish critters wouldn’t enjoy significant power without control over the subverted Christian religion. The proper Scriptural context destroys Jewish abilities to influence dumb goyim.
Isaac’s sons metaphorically became as numerous as the sea’s sand; conversely, Jews comprise a tiny seedline of racial mongrels:
Pure-blooded Whites vastly outnumber Heebs since the promise of Israel becoming large doesn’t apply to the impostors who stole Jacob-Israel’s birthright, while bona fide Jacobites were blind:
Demographics establish Jewry as a minority amongst a larger seed of Israelitish Caucasians. Edomites thrive on duplicity and secrecy, although their identity has emerged, so the Shylocks can’t hide anymore; therefore, Esau—along with their helpers, defenders, and enablers—shall suffer the punishment that prophecy foretells.
The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion aren’t relevant, as plentiful evidence already exposes Jewish criminality—the Harold Rosenthal interview, where an alleged Jew spills the beans, could also be fraudulent. Some consider the Protocols genuine, but skeptics declare otherwise—regardless of their authenticity, truthful insights lurk within. Jewish history consists of monstrous lies, and thus, if Jewry claims the Protocols a forgery, that assumption originates from hominids known for lying and swindling.
The Bible remains the primary source that reveals Esau’s modus operandi and collective fate—everything else is bonus extra-biblical material, assuming it’s verifiably authentic.
Analytical write-ups on the Protocols’ validity remain accessible at:
1. http://www.jewwatch.com/jew-references-protocols-anti-forgery-argument-archive.htm
2. http://www.jewwatch.com/jew-references-protocols-answering-critics.html
Those links are possibly unreachable in various countries, yet TOR circumvents such censorship.
Regardless of their lies, meddling, and scams, folks who claim Jews rule and control the world spread misinformation. Jewry does have sway in worldly affairs, but non-Jewish Esaurians from the upper-level elite families that maintain the dreadful 4th beast kingdom of Daniel (Dan 7:19-25) are the real controllers.
The Vatican, Black Nobility, Royals, and company probably composed the Protocols of Zion, detailing some of their MOs and plans, but utilized the narrative of a Jewish conspiracy to pave the way for a scapegoat.
Edomite schemers used their “lesser brethren” Edomite-Shelahites, AKA Ashkenazim—from interracial mixing in what was formerly Khazaria—and plain ole Shelahite-Canaanites, as whipping boys for centuries. Esau expelled their “lessers” to retain power and calm the uprisings provoked by Jewish usury rackets, which filled royal coffers—Edomic kings who scapegoated Jews obtained a significant cut of the proceeds from this Jewish thievery.
Ahhh, thanks for the fast response!
One last question I have for you: how do you interpret Genesis 3:15? I’ve read at Christogenea, and they are persistent in advocating for a supernatural Lucifer sexual seduction type of event. Personally, it sounds a bit far-fetched for me to swallow.:/
Have a nice day, and may God bless you, kinsman! =)
Very Interesting! Still reading….. what do you think of the post I have written:
https://islamicarchives.wordpress.com/2018/01/10/moses-yahweh-and-the-name-joseph/
This contradiction introduces one previously skipped point, i.e., Yahwistic names wouldn’t have occurred before Moses’ time if the mystifying “Four Letters” first surfaced at the Burning Bush. To explain why assumed Yahwistic abbreviations appear prior to Moses, Yahwists insist Israel discovered the Father’s presumed “proper name” before their bondage in Egypt.
The Almighty declined to reveal the name Moses acquired to Jacob, but Jacob’s son carried a Yahwistic name. The “sacred name” appeared later in the biblical narrative; ergo, Yahwistic names couldn’t emerge before the revelations of God’s purported “name” unless devils injected rubbish into the Scriptures.
Suppose Moses obtained a unique name the Creator never declared unto Moses’ forefathers. In that case, this substantiates that Jacobites knew nothing about the tetragram before Moses allegedly apprehended it, which establishes the name Joseph—if Yahwistic—as anachronistic and inauthentic. Alternative arguments presume Joseph isn’t theophoric, even though it commences with Yod-Vav (YW).
“Lord God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob” comprises a name based upon three historical patriarchs, which the Divine didn’t present to Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob because it includes their names, and the Lord hadn’t yet selected a commemorative name. The Maker wanted to give Moses a memorial to convey to the Israelites and chose remembrance for all generations as the Lord God of the before-mentioned entities.
The trigram (יְהוֹסֵף) variant of Joseph (יוֹסֵף) manifests in Psalm 81:5—another alleged shortened and complete variety of a Yahwistic name. Joseph (YW-SPH) occurs 213 times and Jehoseph (YHW-SPH) once; however, the Strong’s Concordance doesn’t claim Joseph is theophoric, yet scribes recorded this name Yahwisticly within Psalms. Most supposed Yahwistic names have odd short and full versions—it seems as though kikes fabricated them.
Joseph as Yahwistic exposes an anachronism since, unlike the scholars who assert that Jacob’s children acknowledged Yahweh preceding their bondage in Egypt, Exodus contradicts this theory, making Joseph an interpolation. A non-Yahwistic Joseph proves that the consonants Yod-Vav (YW) aren’t automatically theophoric; hence, Yod-He-Vav (YHW) prefixed names as scriptural injections—with the Yod-Vav variations as the original names—is conceivable.
Yod-Vav prefixed names can ostensibly be non-theophoric—one example comes from Jonah, a phony name incorrectly utilized for the word dove. The possibility that the Yod-Vav prefix in Joseph expresses something non-Yahwistic is fascinating, although an apparent trigrammaton version emerges elsewhere.
Exactly, but they still they maintain it is a theophoric name.
What do you think of this article I wrote:
https://islamicarchives.wordpress.com/2018/01/04/why-isra-el-and-not-isra-yahu/
I am going to do more research into theophoric names; I will share once I have more….
The following is a response to archivesislam on January 14, 2018, at 12:22 PM.
God’s pretended “name” arises from the Burning Bush incident; consequently, Yahwists can allege that the Almighty didn’t rename Jacob to Israyahu because He hadn’t yet revealed the tetragrammaton. The complication is that Jacob couldn’t know the name manifested to Moses, but Jacob’s heir possessed a Yahwistic name, and Joseph as non-theophoric isn’t probable due to the Yod-Vav prefix and trigram (YHW) variation. The “sacred name” supposedly emerged during Moses’ lifespan, generating doubts that Joseph is Yahwistic—this name is likely a fabrication.
Early biblical manuscripts aren’t available since malefactors destroyed them after editing Scripture—determining what alterations occurred requires effort, and several Yahwistic names are demonstrably the result of name replacements. James Strong likely didn’t define YW-SPH and YHW-SPH as theophoric because he realized the date discrepancy wouldn’t allow Jacob to name his son with Yahwistic contractions.
Names abbreviated with YHW-, YW-, and -YH are either interpolations, mistakenly thought theophoric, or developed once Israel abandoned and changed their Deity.
Yahweh is one colossal contradiction that archaeological discoveries expose as a fictitious divinity the Israelites adopted from their brother Esau—a secret hidden for millennia. Sufficient documentation uncovered this hoax, so bullheaded Yahwists must live in denial.
I’ve endeavored to enlighten my alleged brethren about this epic bamboozlement—they refuse to honor the facts and instead trust corrupt Jewish scrolls. Only a few individuals with enough intelligence to comprehend that YHWH embodies a malicious interpolation have turned from their Yahwism and assorted delusions.
You got me to turn four years ago, thanks. Never read or heard a word from Finck since.
William Finck teaches some reliable information, although his attitude is unsatisfactory—he labels students “clowns” for merely correcting him, but insults rarely produce fruitful outcomes.
Considerable infighting plagues the group that understands Israel’s identity.
I understand; I never look to team up against someone. I stopped being a listener and reader of Finck when he said, “God [insert Yiddish name] has a lot of other things to think about besides our puny planet in this vast universe with all its other galaxies and solar systems and planets.” I shut it down right after that; I learned that crap teaching comes from the Zohar Kabbalah (I hope I spelled that wrong) and from Babylon.
But you’re right. People aren’t to offend (skandalizo) one of these little ones; it is “more profitable if an ass’s millstone is put around his neck and thrown into the sea.”
Write another one of your sharp-tasting treatises, please.
CI is littered with informants and, likely, Edomite Jew agents that filter their Babylonian Talmudic version of CI all over the Internet. Instead of teaching CI from the Bible, they intentionally subvert it. All their messages are the same general stuff that all of us know. They never delve into research books like Ezra and Nehemiah, which are key to understanding how the Edomite Jews slipped into the land of Judah and later called themselves Judah and, then, later usurped the entire name of Israel. This is the golden key to understanding the scriptures. Remember, they first had to start infiltration into Judah as they knew Jesus Christ would come through that line. The Antichrist and his children always mimic Jesus Christ and His true Israelite people as well as twist the meanings of things.
Internet CI learning will make one run into the likes of Finck, James, Visser, and the scourge of others. Notice how they all allegedly fight one another, yet they sponsor the same guests. I was reading one of Andrew Carrington Hitchcock’s books and saw he had a website. I checked it out, and then I noticed that he has been a guest or has hosted both Finck and James, who are “alleged” enemies. That should make one think a bit before chatting on one of these clowns’ websites, as you might get tracked by the Edomite-run FBI, who can screw up your computer system. Also, most of these sites have overseas connections in countries where Holohoax denial prevents you from providing content. Thus, the fact that these clowns get away with it should make someone suspicious. Just be careful, as these cowards will not have your back.
In closing, may Jesus Christ bless you, and continue to study to show yourself approved.
Thanks for the reminder about Esdras and Neemias (Septuagint spelling). I remember it was V.S. Herrell who also lectured on it. Now I have something to reread. He also pointed out that the Jew is doing just what it is marked to do: lie, slander, cheat, scandalize, bring in false teaching, disaccord, vice, puff you up with material gain, cause you to murder your bloodline, etc. But it is the hypocrite Christian preachers, priests, etc. who are the problem; they are the ones that are to be stopped, stomped, and silenced. Also, the writer of this blog said the same, and this reader is glad I found his work; I feel lucky I did.
Someone commented at the house of Mel Gibstein that when one of Jesus’ students struck the temple guard’s ear with his sword, Jesus said to put it back in your sheath; he did not say get rid of it, which means his students armed themselves. They were not a bunch of peace activists, and flower children like the movies and churches make them out to be.
Thanks for your comment, Jason.
I don’t despise all Christian preachers and assume the malleable types will welcome reform. However, televangelist frauds who own personal jetliners and whatnot aren’t redeemable—only the wicked spread fallacies to become wealthy. Such fraudsters are problematic but not the sole impediment to enlightenment.
The Roman Catholic Church (RCC) manipulates the Christian denominations—that’s evident when quacks like John Hagee, Kenneth Copeland, and George W. Bush venerate the pope. Catholicism’s imminent eradication (Rev 17-18) shall solve tremendous problems.
It wouldn’t hurt to undertake an additional subject. One forthcoming presentation will concern the conjectured sexual seductions that Dual Seedline Christian Identity (DSCI) formulated—requirements to uphold this doctrine are ridiculous.
Thanks for the observations, and God bless.
Sincere folks don’t desire those before-mentioned “Christians” complimenting them. Unless nefarious, pontiffs wouldn’t tolerate endorsements from malefactors. Scoundrels, infiltrators, and mongrels under corrupt influences typically endorse the papacy.
Bush was the papist presiding over the 9/11 hoax, whose father was another actor with connections to the CIA—an agency linked to the Knights of Malta; Hagee is the immense pig who endorses Jewry as God’s chosen; Copeland is a mongrel TV super-preacher with multiple private jets obtained through swindling dumb religious people. When scumbags praise someone, it indicates the person they commend is also scum—the popes of Rome are wretches since those three pretenders honor them.
Although an undeniable deception, the RCC maintains enormous followings. Catholics can’t analyze Holy Writ without encountering contradictions that discredit their faith. Unfortunately, non-Catholic “pastors” improperly contextualize Scripture; nevertheless, Christians usually study the Bible, while Catholics have limited biblical knowledge—Catholicism needs mainstream ignorance to exist. The RCC thrives on illiteracy and doesn’t teach the Good Book much since Revelations 17-18 elucidates their church.
Catholic villains once murdered believers caught reading the Scriptures, and these massacres, past and present, won’t continue unpunished—their cult headquarters (Vatican City) and associated congregations shall suffer annihilation. The anti-NWO revolution involves destroying Satan’s counterfeit “churches.”
I do not consider Catholics as Christian; it is a Babylonian wealth worship cult or some kind of sh*t. I could write a wall of text telling you my adventures on cutting them up, but that’s not necessary; it is a personal fulfillment.
Catholic, nah, that is not Christian; it is some mongrel self-admiration social club. I’m going to choke and slam my Catholic temple-going brother-in-law again.
Errors surfaced while analyzing this manuscript to correct mistakes; however, it consisted of a rough draft. Approximately 3,000 words vanished, even with supplementary content―it was sloppy before. The author revised 30% of the sentences, and proper link utilizations are now active.
Editors must often read something repeatedly to detect most issues, but reexamining this treatise won’t occur until later, so the probability of screw-ups remains.
Future updates will include a date near the top.
I know you are wary of admiration, but I am the worst at that, so I do not even try, but I do check in to reread and to see if maybe you might write some more, so I can arm myself with it. But even if you stop, you have given plenty already.
The following is a response to F.L on August 10, 2018, at 5:41 PM.
Fredrik’s doubt exhibits a mind wishing to contemplate for itself without taking smooth-sounding doctrines as fact and to prove all things.
The society that realizes its destiny as Israelites have varying viewpoints and perceptions—folks may think independently without causing unjustified division, but debaters must present their arguments with ample documentation.
William Finck of Christogenea no longer believes in a rebellious angel named “Lucifer” nor a “Satan” with the same silly story. He hosts an assortment of CI material composed by numerous scholars throughout the preceding decades, many of whom believed in such a phantom that functions as a singular adversary. Logic exposes Lucifer as an inadequate translation employed in only one verse within some unreliable scriptural texts—Isaiah 14 introduces a Babylonian king who perished long ago in ancient Babylonia.
Ezekiel 28 is another confusing chapter that mainstream Christians attribute to “Satan’s” activities in the Garden of Eden—closer examinations reveal the prophecy concerns Tyre’s sovereignty from millennia past. Students don’t generally compare Hebrew with Greek translations of Scripture. Once the misinterpretations dissipate, it becomes sensible that “Satan” represents a title and Lucifer refers to a deceased man. Since this shatters “serpent seed” myths, felons like Finck instead teach that a colored humanoid sexually seduced the birther of Adamkind; accordingly, Eve was a miscegenator, and her son, Cain, was the genetic mutant of either a heavenly cherub or pre-Adamic subhuman.
Christogenians maintain easily refutable positions about Hitler they cannot defend yet continue in their falsehoods—Hitlerites could dismiss the intelligence offered at Steven’s WordPress Blog (SWPB) if untrue, but the evidence is overwhelming. William Raymond Finck runs somewhat of a cult and won’t permit everyone to investigate the “level plane” Earth and other subjects. Finck labels his ministry Christianity for the Thinking Man, although the feds presumably control him; therefore, he can’t think appropriately on various topics.
Flat-Earth (FE) is relevant because betrayers under oaths occupationally safeguard secrets and attack truth-tellers who unveil what the collective Devil on Earth wishes to conceal. Since Bill Finck despises FE, even though the facts destroy Ball-Earthers, this suggests he’s an infiltrator like many others, including “Eli James” and assorted collaborators on Euro-Folk-Radio: “Pastor” Steve and “Professor” Truth. These impostors received exposure as liars—yours truly encouraged the man responsible for refuting their recent denunciations by posting messages on his BitChute channel (videos 4 through 6 on FE for Dummies). Nevertheless, Charles’ other beliefs regarding Hitler, YHWH, and the sex fantasy narrative of Genesis are poisonous.
Earth-dwellers are forever learning, with some people more advanced in understanding than the average Joe. When data surfaces to dispel faulty suppositions, educating the brainwashed multitudes is sometimes tricky. For instance, most accepted the 9/11 falsities, and many still do decades following this terrorist hoax event—those tolerating such deceits are either stupid, cowards, or pay-rolled operatives.
William Finck had a colleague named Mark Downey who rejected the Dual-Seedline heresy and denied a “supernatural” Devil. Mark was right concerning “Satan” and the fictional carnal seduction of Eve—regardless of doctrinal disagreements, their fellowship continued. Mark and I had e-mail correspondence before his friendship with Bill; however, the communications stopped once Mark resisted correction about Hitler. After nearly five years, I contacted Mr. Downey again with new ammunition for my accusations—the words proceed from their Führer’s mouth in a speech titled A Final Appeal for Peace and Sanity, where Germany’s “messiah” feigns prophethood and delivers a prophecy that didn’t transpire the way he predicted.
Last year’s conversations with Downey remained friendly and mostly respectful—I showed information, and Mark kept an open mind or stated he could have one. In my final e-mail in early September 2017, I wrote that if Downey didn’t stop lying, he’d be in trouble, and informed him John the Baptist fulfilled the “Elijah prophecy” (Mat 11:14) to humble his presumption that their ministry—and possibly some others—was such a fulfillment. Mark failed to respond following these threats, and there aren’t public records of him trying to repent or re-educate those he deceived; moreover, his previous friend, William Finck, continues to mislead instead of admitting Hitler personified a spurious prophet.
In summary, I explained to Downey his faults and presented the details, which Mark ignored until he passed away months later. Mr. Downey died of cancer on March 26, 2018, at age 68, without seeking to remedy the disinformation about Hitler and wondered how this affliction befell him—he didn’t drink nor smoke and ate organically. Mark would’ve acknowledged the corrections and repented if the truth mattered to him, yet this teacher wouldn’t embrace reality. I’m not glad Mark’s dead, but disappointed he expired without correcting the lies.
Regarding Fredrik’s question:
Paul didn’t preach about presenting Christians as literal virgins; otherwise, few would be presentable—humans grow up and procreate. Paul addresses the mental corruption that afflicted our primogenitors and not wanting it to befall fellow believers; Corinthians speaks spiritually, yet seedline adherents assert that Eve’s beguilement constituted a physical loss of her virginity via the “snake” rather than a depraved mind.
That’s what occurred, although “serpent seed” fibbers speculate something else transpired or allege that scoundrels modified the Scriptures to make it appear Adam copulated with Eve and produced Cain—seedliners possess no verification that Genesis 4:1 is an interpolation.
Cain finds similarities with Esau—these Adamites turned rotten, miscegenated, and held murderous intentions. Sinners don’t need mythological monsters in their woodpile to develop into villainous persons or perpetrate crimes:
Seedline proponents wrongly picture Cain’s progenitor as a wicked Devil since he became nefarious.
Adam and Eve’s thoughts became corrupt by knowing good and evil; however, intercourse with “fallen angels” isn’t confirmable—Adam knew his wife, and thus Cain came into existence.
Adam partook of the “fruit,” so if sexual defilements happened, his involvement could only entail homosexual copulation or group sex—to assume this among the initial biblical stories epitomizes foolishness.
Genesis Chapter III constitutes a metaphorical parable, generating several views on its meaning. Fabulists conjecture that sexual romps occurred; nevertheless, nowhere does it affirm that Eve fornicated with the snake, acquired the serpent’s seed, then immediately obtained another baby through Adam, and thenceforth birthed two children—Cain and Abel—from different fathers. The only explicit and non-allegorical verse—Genesis 4:1—declares that Adam inseminated Eve, who got pregnant with Cain.
Seedline theories involve a rare phenomenon called heteropaternal superfecundation, with few documented worldwide cases, yet this supposedly took place during the first sexual encounter in recorded history.
This viper conceivably already had seed roaming the Earth; otherwise, where would he originate? Other hominids existed before Adam—Cain mongrelized his seedline with foreign women from the land of Nod (Gen 4:16), and speculatively, at this point, his posterity became part of the cursed serpent seed.
Multiple ways of interpreting the Genesis account exist, provoking considerable study and contemplation. To disprove their deranged hypothesis, SWPB must examine the Two-Seedline drivel, identify the flaws, and explain their incorrectness in-depth—yours truly intended to do this and received seedline questions thrice before.
Eve either had non-white mystery meat inserted into her vagina—and probably elsewhere—or she didn’t. Alternatively, the unenlightened who fabricate an angel named Lucifer can apply their nonsense and claim a celestial entity—with reproductive organs capable of inseminating human females—impregnated Eve.
Repudiating the “serpent seed” conclusions is a virtuous endeavor—those insisting that Christendom won’t understand Scripture unless they interpret an allegory as gang-bangs or sodomy (Adam likewise consumed the fruit) are unreasonable, so advise these “brothers” to cease listening to kikes who sexualize everything. There aren’t any requirements to respect foolish arguments to acquire insights into what the Bible reveals; therefore, don’t allow these quacks to belittle others for dismissing their naughty interpretations.
Addendum 12/7/2018:
Charles Fockaert is frequently incorrect and parrots Christian Identity folklore. CI disseminates various false teachings but comprises the primary assembly with germane racial contextualizations; however, their “preachers” are under demonic federal possession. Charles exemplifies someone who doesn’t hold the unblemished truth but possesses a heart desiring to accomplish good, although he’s correct on some issues. Fictions about the Devil/Satan/Lucifer, misconceptions concerning Hitler, fanciful tales involving obscene sex parties, and fallacious assumptions about God’s names aren’t truthful, but that’s CI 101, and such inaccuracies prevail. While these errors remain uncorrected, SWPB desires disassociation with Christian Identity. Appreciatively, Mr. Downey didn’t promote such claptraps, except for his admiration of Adolf Hitler. Fockaert considers himself at the highest level in “truth-telling” because of his flat-Earth undertakings, which Identity “pastors” despise since their managers mandate it—people lose jobs over this—but Charles must unlearn garbage gathered from CI.
Numerous “pastors” recently popped out of the woodwork to criticize Flat Earth and insult the learners who confirmed it. (Ridicule and slander are childish and, from middle-aged men, quite shameful—untruthful dogs resort to such misbehavior.) Their masters doubtlessly ordered this—or else—because the attacks commenced near the same time. The Jewish chameleon, Eli James, who prophesied the world would end in 2012, with countdown timers on his website to the exact date, joined these attackers—Eli’s supposed enemy and former prison inmate, William Finck, accompanied the anti-FE bandwagon. Eli James’ acquaintance, “Professor Truth,” supported FE and claimed intelligent men have solid reasons to believe it—including his comrade, who’s supposedly a “high-ranking” angel incarnate—then flipped out, ridiculed Flat-Earthers, and scoffed; the “Professor’s” controllers forced this attitude reversal. (Prof. Truth’s “high-level” friend, Zen Garcia, is genetically impure.) Another of Eli James’ (Joseph November/Putz) co-conspirators, “Pastor” Steve—a jailbird with tattoos who ate kosher food while imprisoned—participated in the assaults against FE; this minister spreads the usual CI absurdities and insults FE as a supervised Jewish prison bitch would. Alex Jones—another Jewish fraudster—also conducted insulting diatribes against Flat-Earthers.
The tools God’s foes regulate are unreal—FE-haters comprise demonically controlled agents and unlearned ignoramuses. Bill Finck accompanies many known shills in attacking FE concepts, and these Jewy CI spokesmen worship Yahweh; hence, “Gibstein’s” assertion that Jews don’t say “the Name” isn’t factual.
MelGibstein, a Yahwist with a pseudonym, rejects that mankind doesn’t inhabit a revolving “water ball” floating through “space,” which Satanists indoctrinated most into embracing for approximately 500 years—rockets only travel so far upward before reaching the firmament (Gen 1:6-8). “Gibstein’s” assertions that the title Lord denotes Baal and the name Y’shua (H3442) has theophoric elements suffered rigorous refutation; nonetheless, this brother is incapable of understanding—erroneous teachers taught “Mel” Yahwistic rubbish and transformed him into a parrot. After requesting MelGibstein’s name and picture, this bloke refused the request, although respectable folks don’t use aliases, especially in America—“Gibstein” assumes he protects family members through such concealment, but others display their faces and provide identities. Evidence soundly refutes Yahwists, although these hotshots relish pseudo-knowledge and disacknowledge the facts.
The Magnificent One of the Firmament (Deu 33:26) caused Noah’s flood by opening the upper protective layer, and water poured down. H2O lurks above the transparent roof in the sky; consequently, the sky’s blue—waters beneath the dome are the oceans, seas, rivers, creeks, and lakes. When zoomed in, the stars and so-called “planets” resemble flickering light sources because earthlings view them through the floodwaters above.
Shooting The Stars with a Nikon Coolpix P900 (3:08).
Nikon P900 Stars- Real Stars and Planets vs NASA images. Stars are not what they tell us! (4:51).
These videos show P900 cameras zooming in—those luminous lights unmistakably reside in H2O.
The goofballs the Lord’s enemies placed within the Identity movement aren’t impressive—while “Gibstein” might not be one, he circulates misinformation.
“Dr.” Preston Bailey, Ph.D.—another punk associated with arrogant “globers” like “Professor” Truth—alleges that Jesus Christ and Archangel Michael visited his office; however, that’s impossible since those entities are identical, and our Lord wouldn’t visit imbeciles with fancy appellations. (Federally financed clowns who discredit the racial message of Scripture outnumber the real workers.) “Archangel” Gabriel also allegedly visits this Christian snake oil salesman, yet that angel isn’t a chief messenger.
Charles complains about getting nothing but Social Security benefits, although Mr. Fockaert teaches abhorrent fallacies and thus deserves zilch. Fockaert asserts those not honoring Hitler aren’t “truthers” and that everybody should watch The Greatest Story Never Told; nevertheless, SWPB exposed their hero as a counterfeit, and no amount of propaganda will repair Hitler’s image. Charles should be thankful he acquires anything while propagating perversions and needs humiliation for exalting himself to the “top tier” of truth.
I deserve all the money deceivers such as Finck and Fockaert get for teaching baloney, yet have no donation signs or books to sell, unlike them; furthermore, this exposition uncovers their manifold distortions and remains free. Charles says, “Find someone to support”—he’s unworthy and already obtains governmental checks while biting the allegorical hand that feeds him.
Cain as a tare the Father never planted, sired by either a non-white “beast” or metaphysical entity from Saturn—or wherever the goofs imagine—destroys Finck’s non-universalist theme; the Creator conversed with Cain and guaranteed conditional acceptance. The Lord states, “Sin lieth at the door,” yet according to non-universalists, non-whites aren’t under scriptural law, further proving Cain was entirely Adamic. This story’s conclusion implies that even mongrels or the devilish progeny of “Lucifer” can do well and receive the Almighty’s blessing, although Scripture isn’t universal—Cain was a White man of appropriate seed.
“Serpent Seed” hoaxers concoct imaginative and contradictory tall tales, making CI advocates seem like morons bringing Adam into homosexual encounters—as if the erotic seductions of Eve weren’t bad enough—with a fictitious character called Lucifer. Their opinions are dismissible speculations that reek of Jewish derangement.
Eve declared that her offspring originated from God—not Satan or any serpent—confirming that the Father planted Cain; ergo, the Divine offers acceptance through satisfactory servitude. Perhaps Identity ministers prefer the strange sexual hypotheses because the Planter didn’t plant them, and the thought of the Lord affording weeds recognition for doing “well” offers a sense of possible approval—their twisted theory turns the God of Israel into a Universalist who accepts racially adulterated mutts.
“Sacred name” falsifications are comparable to the sexual seduction bunkum—both require misinterpreters to deny Holy Writ and replace accurate accounts with conjectures. Rather than accept the name of the Lord Jesus as New Testament manuscripts record, Yahwists alter names and anathematize legitimate titles. Instead of believing the Bible about Eve knowing Adam, conceiving Cain, and gaining a child through God, doubters insist the snake fathered her infant. Deviant sex fantasies are a Yahwist favorite, showing how illogical they are, although Two-Seedliners take pride in their assumed knowledge—mamzers love the sexual seduction dogmas since they provide potential clemency.
SWPB wishes no associations with knuckleheads who had their imaginations corrupted by Jewish fables and refuse improvement.
Addendum 9/28/2020:
Add Jeromy Visser, a mamzerized DSCI spook, to the list of “Christians” who cannot refute spinning “water ball” delusions—either this turd possesses poor investigative skills, or satanic employers demand conformity to standardized untruths.
The Bible confirms the Creator’s non-spherical creation as a stationary plane with water above the sky, which deniers must disregard to “debunk” flat-Earth—globetards repudiate the biblical chronicles to reinforce heliocentrism. The All-Powerful immobilized the sun and moon, not the motionless earth (Jos 10:12-13; 1Chr 16:30).
Visser, the admitted mongrel, comprehends that popery and Jesuits deceive the masses yet makes flights to the Vatican and supports their non-Christian spheroid theories.
This mongrelized biped, with connections to William Finck, claims hell-hounds fund Christian Identity—next, he leaves the cult and returns in 2019 as a “pastor” with donation arrangements.
Thanks for the informative answer! : )
It’s sad that Downey didn’t want to see the truth for what it was, for I learned most of my “CI” stuff from him right after I became suspicious of Finck’s interpretation of the Bible for citing Jewish sources like the Talmud/Zohar. Mark got my head questioning a lot of so-called “facts.”
Pardon me for asking another question, but have you read Emahiser’s “proof” for the sexual seduction of Eve by the serpent? Emahiser, or the early Celtic church, as he brings up, taught it.
I will link it in case you haven’t read it already.
https://emahiser.christogenea.org/early-celtic-church-taught-physical-seduction-eve
Thanks as always for your brilliant thoughts! =) and may the Lord be with you, brother.
I agree about Downey—his departure means one less anti-literalist concerning hotly contested topics like “Lucifer” and the conjectured sexual seduction of Eve. Whether Mark’s death was an act of God, a fluke, or a homicide, it isn’t my responsibility. Murder via cancer-inducing weapons is plausible, with Finck as a suspect—those two disagreed about the identity of the Great Whore of Revelation, the Serpent Seed, Yahweh, and assorted subjects. Moreover, Downey held anti-Masonic positions, and Bill teamed with a Scottish Rite Freemason.
Mark’s biggest flaw was his reverence for Hitler and refusal to undergo enlightenment—I informed him he wasn’t stupid and could piece it together. William and Mark maintained a friendship likely due to their admiration for Germany’s pseudo-prophet—with this bond broken, they wouldn’t have much in common, so maybe Mr. Downey never corrected such pitfalls to avoid companionship losses.
Christian Identity suffers from myriad issues, but spies are the primary complication. “Pastors” who praise false messiahs make Identists look like clowns—when damning proof refutes their myths, plus they refuse correction, this shows signs of infiltration or ego problems. Hitler’s admirers stigmatize CI, but disowning fellows because of ignorant viewpoints is unjustifiable; nevertheless, it becomes upsetting once the mythmakers deny irrefutable facts, especially when these liars collect donations and sell merchandise.
The “Church” always had erroneous dogmas, so whether an early Celtic congregation taught Eve committed adultery isn’t relevant—nobody knows everything, leaving room for improvement, and as the ages pass, divergent understandings replace former ones thought true. For instance, churchgoers fabricated a supernatural Devil for millennia, although reasonable people realize that’s superstitious hogwash. Emahiser was close with William, yet Finck saw through the “Satan” nonsense while Clifton preached it fanatically—“serpent seed” concepts require the Satan (transliteration) hoax unless you’re like Bill and theorize Eve copulated with non-white hominids.
Among the only publications from Mr. Emahiser I’ve analyzed is Mark Downey’s Phony No-Satan Dogma, where Clifton preaches on a high horse, with exclamation marks littered throughout his flawed rebuttal. This golden-ager carried multiple pet doctrines, which he spent decades seeking to prove—to discover that he’s wrong would be potentially unbearable.
An excerpt from Clifton’s inadequate refutation:
Clifton asserts that teachers who don’t interpret a parable and title (“satan”) the way he does have nothing else of value; furthermore, this misguided man labels Dual-Seedline critics as antichrists that circulate “incompetent and unqualified gibberish”—Two-Seedline fanatics aren’t generally capable of unlearning deep-seated lies.
Emahiser attempted to make Downey appear like an imbecile for mistakenly asserting that “satan” is a pronoun and placed a “[sic]” in some quotations to discredit Mark over minor writing errors. However, Emahiser introduced his own mistake by stating “satan” (adversary) with the “definite article” is an uppercase “Satan” or “the Adversary,” referring to the diabolical “Devil” of Christian mythology—the indefinite article is “a satan” or “an adversary,” and, with the article prefixed (definite article), the “a” or “an” merely turns into “the” as in “the satan” or “the adversary,” with no requirement to capitalize “Satan” nor “Adversary.” Just who the adversary is—and their numerosity—remains a matter of interpretation.
I’m not eager to bash folks, but Identity adherents are at each other’s throats over interpretive disagreements. If Clifton Emahiser possessed no woodpile secrets, yours truly doesn’t despise this now-deceased geezer, regardless of his mind-boggling inaccuracies.
Love,
Steven
Matthew 23:15 speaks of a Finck. Making proselytes twofold more the children of hell than himself and the Jews. No TV for six years, no Finck for more than four, and I know others must have me beat, but it feels nice in my head now. Thanks for your work.
You’re welcome, but at least William teaches some truth—mainstream Christian and Catholic clergymen remain the biggest pukes. Nevertheless, Billy the Fink is probably an infiltrator. Christian Identity is an infiltrator’s playground.
You’re right, what is the matter with me? He did clear things up and helped me understand a lot, like rendering the things of Caesar to Caesar and the things of God to God, meaning “sure you can give made-up things like money back to the government, but that does not mean you give your soul to man’s government; that you give to God. Don’t give what belongs to God to Caesar.”
That is a nice sword I now use among others. Thanks for the kick in the head.
That was simply an observation, so don’t flatter Finck—he’ll pay for his dishonesty and misrepresentations, like Downey. Bill never significantly influenced me, and besides some paragraphs, I’ve read nothing from this felon since 2011. Mark didn’t teach me much either, as my conclusions developed while absorbing little from Identity ministries. Various things William taught turned out false—truths intertwined with untruths are worthless.
Students who desire to hear inappropriate names of God, deceptive narratives about Hitler, heliocentric falsehoods, Dual-Seedline cock-and-bull stories, and Finck’s “freaking quack” voice may tune into this former corrupt prison supervisor. That dog collects donations and sells merchandise while misleading people, although he shall likely perish soon enough, along with the other “pastors.”
For Bill’s genealogy to contain no impurities and for him to repent of his errors would be great, but that’s a pipedream.
Wow, I just found out that Aphrahat, a Syriac Christian author, believed that jews were literally children of Cain! :o.
In case you haven’t seen it, I will link it!:)
Go to page 262 and read.
Sorry if it’s a long text, but I thought someone like you would find this to be interesting other than me. As always best wishes from jewish occupied Sweden, and praise the Lord Jesus Christ! =)
The non-white invasions and subsequent mass rapes throughout Europe disturbed me enough to pray for your nation.
This entire world is corrupt and demands ultraviolence to solve complications. Unfortunately, truthers can only provide information and attempt to inform potential listeners, although many have already sold their souls, while others remain oblivious, and such zombies deserve death for carrying useless attitudes.
Profound brainwashing persuades Caucasoids to accept their ultimate destruction—unlocking the identity of White people (Israel) eliminates the brainwash.
Mongrel Jewish hominids are Canaanites and Edomites—some might be Cain’s descendants, but it doesn’t matter much. Those not among the acceptable seedline our Father acknowledges are trespassers—their ancestry is irrelevant, considering all pricks and thorns shall soon vanish because they conquered Israelite nations and dishonored Israel.
Hi, thanks for the fast reply, brother! =)
Sweden is so bad; I wonder if the other Swedes will ever accept the truth called “Israel Identity.” We call the liberal conservatives “Nazis” or some other word like “racist” for just wanting to reduce the amount of mongrels coming into our country, so it seems almost too grim to imagine what the future will be like for us white Swedes =(.
I think it’s a type of collective “amnesia” or being afraid of being called racist that sometimes even makes me ponder if some supernatural “angel” will help us like William Finck “preaches.” We are being replaced so fast, and meanwhile, nobody reacts and tells the truth about it, and those that do are all pro-“Israel” half-truthers that are OK with race-mixing and just “some” mongrels coming into Sweden, so long as they follow our laws and learn to speak our language.
Regarding that “Syriac” author from the distant past, it really strengthens my belief that the father of the “Jews” is a non-supernatural being like Cain who is the “Devil” and not a supernatural entity like “Lucifer.”
I’m going to link this website on every “Christian Identity” video I can find on Jewtube so people can get corrected about believing in some errors of theirs, namely the tetragrammaton and the supernatural “fallen angel Lucifer” lie, or at least give them a chance to read what you have written on the topic.
Sorry for the long doom and gloom wall of text; I hope you dont mind this, and me linking this website to people. Praise the Lord God of Israel, and as always, best wishes.
Fredrik! =)
The following is a response to F.L on January 12, 2019, at 2:15 AM.
You’re welcome—feel free to publicize my site.
Becoming disheartened is easy—Israel’s opponents destroy, and Jacob’s sons reject their Deity’s salvational racism. One plague of these times is the Lord’s people loathing Him and dismissing the truth (Rom 1:30; 2Th 2:10-12). True Israel is the victim of deadly indoctrination that conditions them to accept termination at their enemies’ hands, yet Israelite majorities remain unconcerned; they’re cowards and despise the Father—two grievous crimes—and the wide passage to destruction exists for apocalyptic reasons (Mat 7:13). Scorners of the Creator shall encounter annihilation, but Identity provides solutions for the God-loving remnants.
Citizens of the United States Corporation are generally stupid, swallow poison, consume mind-altering chemicals, watch television, and the Devil introduced readily accessible vices to immerse them in sin. Their make-believe President, Donald Trump, is an adversary in sheep’s clothing, who respects God’s foes, and is pushing hazardous vaccinations and 5G weaponry for distribution throughout the continent—5G underwent development in “Israel,” and Israelis apparently aren’t getting this weapon meant to provoke health complications and privacy infringements. Standard WiFi is dangerous enough, but 5G employs millimeter waves—5gdangers.com hosts information, along with supposed declassified CIA documents, regarding 5G’s purported detrimental effects. The website operator—Joe Imbriano, AKA “the Fullerton Informer”—never provided material on anything previously unknown, other than the probable hazards of the upcoming 5G, although maybe Fockaert mentioned this. That “Israelis” helped create 5G but supposedly won’t have it installed within their country and instead deployed in the dumb goy populations is suspicious.
Israeli parasites obtain everything freely through theft and governmental control, but their wireless technologies—praised as excellent speed improvements—won’t receive deployment inside their borders. If North Americans had security, those advocating for 5G would be under arrest; however, most state and federal governments are untrustworthy and function as domestic antagonists or self-serving dirtbags. Israelis involved themselves with the attacks on the USS Liberty and Twin Towers—now, America is receiving “their” fishy technology documented as armaments employing millimeter wavelengths. The five dancing “Israelis” celebrating the 9/11 terrorist activities in NYC were there to “record the event,” although illegitimate U.S. “authorities” sent them back to “Israel.”
Mr. Imbriano believes in Lucifer and presumes the adversaries exterminating Israel celebrate him, highlighting how ridiculous the bozos are to worship non-existent spooks. Joe doesn’t promote the Almighty’s racially exclusive covenant yet seems sincere with a heart yearning to accomplish good. Still, Joey deserves disrespect—lesser-known YouTube (YT) publishers like Charles Fockaert can’t acquire the audience Fullerton’s “informer” does since Charles teaches racial truths, which the heathens and God-hating Whites loathe. (YT staff frequently flag Fockaert’s content as inappropriate for community guidelines and disable comments.) Joe, the Californian multicultist, develops an admiration club utilizing a Jewish-controlled network and remains reluctant to become extreme and exclusionary because his followers will diminish.
As a potential “intelligence” operative, Joe won’t preach the Identity message and doesn’t carry the same courage as the folks who experience comment shutdowns and restraints if they reluctantly utilize YouTube to teach CI. (Not that “the Fullerton Informer” is scripturally knowledgeable—he produces no biblical revelations and conducts an Alex Jones style of operation.) Additionally, Joey sympathizes with coloreds and accompanies them; hence, he’s a Universalist and wouldn’t have a fan society otherwise.
Addendum 1/18/2019:
Imbriano’s spouse hails from South Korea, and her kinfolk reside within North Korea; ergo, Joe’s a miscegenator with mongrels the Lord didn’t plant, so the chances of this bloke acknowledging the real truth are slim. Imbriano claims to be Christian and uses the name Jesus Christ, but authentic Christianity prohibits interracial marriage—his uploads are irrelevant because those who don’t explain Identity aren’t presenting the truth and waste everyone’s time. The “both sides of an argument” phenomenon possibly manifests with the “Fullerton Informer,” but whatever the case, Joe-Joe rejects properly contexted Scripture—even if this blowhard accepted it, he must dispose of his marital partner and kids. He’ll never permit such remedies, so the boogeymen Luciferian forces Imbriano screams about must arrange everything for him.
Joe’s a Flat-Earther, although he’s likely an opposition agent Satan controls.
This character said the USA comprises a nation of perverts with immorality problems, yet he’s one to talk. Imbriano commits fornication whenever he intercourses with his heathen wife, and Joe’s children aren’t of proper seed—by contaminating his bloodline, Mr. Imbriano is an adulterer. Joe requests intercessory prayer because “weirdos” want to harm his mamzers, but the Lord God intends to neutralize them; therefore, “the Fullerton Informer” calls the Judge unbefitting names.
Addendum 9/23/2019:
Turkey Joe claimed miraculous events saved his mongrelized family member, and this race-mixer declares that it transpired because a righteous man’s fervent prayers availeth much (Jam 5:16); meanwhile, this “pious” gasbag sexually penetrates a gook. Joe’s offspring constitute bastards not planted by the Father, and the Savior’s salvation doesn’t include them—descendants of White men produced via non-whites aren’t pure-blooded and thus mamzerized. Imbriano flatters himself on his alleged righteousness, although he’s a persistent fornicator, adulterer, and truth-hater.
The Almighty’s regulations prohibit Jacobites from mingling with alien races; nevertheless, this charlatan boasts respectability while engaging in transgressive behavior.
Since the beginning, the Divine’s nature has been “kind after kind.”
Mr. Imbriano’s hybrids have no inheritance, nor did the Lord miraculously preserve this unrighteous fruitcake’s mixed-race progeny. He’s one of those “Christians” who informs about nothing except well-known conspiracies—an Alex Jones 2.0 without marketing penile enhancements.
In natural, uncorrupted conditions, Israelites are separate, living homogeneously; hence, an impossibility for miscegenation, as the Maker intended.
Jacob-Israel lingers in the season of corrupt multiracialism (commingling among the seed of humanity):
God’s Kingdom shall annihilate foreign nations; accordingly, fornicators and adulterers like Imbriano will no longer lust after exotic meat and produce mutts. Blind individuals who commit such deeds are redeemable, but Joey pretends he’s upright, so his earnest invocations mean something; therefore, this lukewarm, professed Christian must suffer the appropriate humiliation. Joe appears conspiracy-savvy; nonetheless, Imbriano denies his unrighteousness, doesn’t possess the truth, and the Creator disapproves of his posterity.
Hello, sorry for the late response.:/
Yeah, that Fockart guy is quite fishy, just like every single one of these supposed “truthers.” Why sell the truth, as you said in previous comments on this website, when Christ never sold his truth that he preached, and on top of that, have the nerve to call themselves “Christians.” It feels almost as if these people are desecrating God’s name.
BTW, what language do you think the 12 tribes spoke? I’ve heard everything from Koine Greek to Aramaic. I get that they had to be speaking some sort of Greek because of the LXX/Septuagint, but some insist Aramaic; it confuses me.
As always, love Fredrik. =)
Jacob’s progeny spoke Phoenician following their departure from Egypt; some Judahites communicated in Aramaic during the Babylonian captivity, and others later employed Greek.
A Jewish “judge” and crazy ex-wife stole the money Fockaert accumulated as a real estate developer, plus Charles’ book isn’t Bible-related—he may profit from his story, which Lulu and Amazon refuse to market. Writing is a legitimate profession—writers deserve compensation for their work. Fockaert doesn’t seem like a money-grubber and claims he’ll give Deadbeat Dad in Portable Document Format; nevertheless, this PDF remains offline—he wants earnings for his writing endeavors.
Readers might wish to access information in non-digitized forms; therefore, CI authors may sell booklets if digitally accessible. “Pastor” Eli James is one Identity author with a publication available only through purchase, but yours truly wouldn’t read it—even if free—since he’s an undeniable infiltrator.
One downside of serving the Lord in these deceptive times is that folks are unfriendly and don’t desire to hear the truth, which can cause income deterioration; conversely, those not benefiting God get everything handed to them in life. 501c3 churches run a business that doesn’t benefit the Almighty, and these brick-and-mortar gatherings are government propaganda houses. YouTube won’t pay Charles anything and make discovering his channel troublesome; furthermore, YT sometimes censors Fockaert’s comment section.
Nothing has changed over the millennia—today, the priest class fleece the flock, misinterpret Scripture, and live comfortably within their often luxurious homes. Teachers with large audiences preach mainstream nonsense and amass extreme wealth.
I don’t hate Charles, although he’s incorrect about various subjects and needs humiliation for assuming himself at the “top level” while parroting falsehoods—CI deceptions are overabundant and become irritating.
I just wanted to throw in this book while we are at it; it could be of good use against the Serpent seedliners=)
https://archive.org/details/WhatAboutTheSeedlineDoctrine
I will admit that I was like Charles regarding “certain” Identity falsehoods until I found Downey’s site and finally yours.
I will also admit that the first time I read your treatise (Hitler and Christian Identity), I thought that you were just another hater, but after I did some additional research, I had to come to the same conclusion, and thus agree with you that Hitler was actually a false prophet. It pains me, but like you said, there had to be a God-given reason for his defeat.
BTW, do you have a Jewtube or Bitchute account available where I could reach you on?:P
As always, praise Christ =) Fredrik.
I’m on neither of those networks.
I’m a hater and lover, hating evil and loving good, although not without imperfections—perfect folks don’t exist. It takes exceptional people to admit mistakes and accept corrections—many fellows would rather keep lying than confess faults.
As an impressionable teenager, I believed in “Satan’s” fantastical “brood of vipers” but overcame that deception fast—at 14 years of age, a television preacher named Arnold Murray informed me about my Israelite identity and misinformed me about “the Devil’s” offspring. Murray was an agent of the enemy with woodpile secrets—he claimed Indian ancestry; however, some pure-blooded Caucasoids falsely claim that for varied reasons. During my late teens, I realized this alleged combat Marine was a deceiver—my racial identity remains the only valuable information this “seedline” televangelist provided.
Recognizing those indoctrinated by “Dr.” Murray is straightforward—indoctrinees parrot his falsehoods and imagine they possess specialized knowledge as “God’s elect,” although these dupes are brainwashing victims. One example of a character lacking discernment who absorbs erroneous doctrines is John Rhine at americanwisdomseries.com—such “Murrayites” harbor misconceptions obtained from a mongrelized TV “pastor.” MelGibstein’s primary commentator, Ray Zerwitt, links to John’s site, featuring a geezer copycatting the false teacher, Arnold Murray.
Roy Hobs shipped me Mr. Weisman’s publication, but yours truly merely skimmed portions of this text since it wasn’t free, and all authentic truth comes freely accessible. What About The Seedline Doctrine? now resides on the Internet, so I’ll read the rebuttal comprehensively once time permits. After pointing out various seedline flaws as Charles Weisman did, Roy thought I had previously scrutinized this booklet, although deconstructing the “serpent seed” fiction is easy.
Sexual seedline interpretations are bogus because, according to their doctrine, Cain was a tare the Lord didn’t sow—or “genetic devil,” as “seedliners” put it—and tares await prophetic extermination. The Almighty grants Cain conditional acceptance plus holds him accountable for “sin,” but Christogenians assert that mamzeroids aren’t under our Judge’s laws; moreover, Corinthians (2Cor 11:2-3) mentions a non-literal account of chaste virginity without mental beguiling, yet serpentine hoaxers make the beguilement in the Garden a physical seduction, which Adam likewise joined.
The “serpent seed” proponents’ pridefulness is ridiculous—these tall-tellers deceive Christians, obtain donations, and sell merchandise. For seedline adherents to acknowledge their erroneousness is improbable, as they consciously disseminate untruths or are too arrogant to recognize shortcomings. Without repentance, seedliners will vanish soon enough—fallacies profited from won’t last forever.
It doesn’t matter if those Edomite “pastors” lie since the Creator already damned such weeds; however, whosoever of the “good” seed that spreads lies shall also perish. For the already-condemned to discontinue lying is pointless, although all someone with appropriate genetics must do is humble themselves and respect correction—keeping perverted sex stories around is madness. The perverse sexual fantasies inserted into Scripture comprise falsities—this despicable untruth makes the mother of the White race a race-mixing slut who noticed the serpent “pleasant to the eyes” (Gen 3:6) and desired him sexually.
Thanks for the URLs, and God bless.
Significant editorial work blessed this entire manuscript starting in September 2018, producing an official second draft substantially better than its predecessor. Thousands of superfluous words disappeared, improving conciseness, along with corrections to passive voice, run-on sentences, verb tenses, unwanted fragments, repetitions, and word choice to enhance diversification and length. Several sentence-breaking errors—missing, truncated, misplaced, and misused words—surfaced; the first insufficient edit went unexamined. This go-around, sufficient proofreading occurred after editing—any remaining mistakes that slipped through the cracks are insignificant. Every link received the correct implementation, and all texts the composer didn’t produce are now within quotes (essentially concordance entries). Before, this document’s word count approached 60,000, but trimming techniques decreased it to approximately 46k. This rework was more complex and time-consuming, spanning months rather than weeks, although much knowledge increased.
The Tetragrammaton Deception shall suffer stagnation until this writer’s skills progress. Yours truly obtained some books on writing, but transformational improvements from them aren’t likely; however, a final draft could eventuate following additional study and practice. One recommendation was to reduce adverbs; nevertheless, rules don’t exist against their utilization. Critics claiming that adverbials are unacceptable often consist of self-centered individuals who promote personal styles—such modifiers only become unsatisfactory when having identical meanings as the verb or stronger independent verbs are available. For experience purposes, drafts focused on adverb reduction might commence with thoughtful comparisons between the adverb-friendly and adverb-reduced versions.
While composing Bible-related material in 2009 as a “young” 26-year-old, Steven wrote Satan’s True Identity Revealed and concluded that presentation in 2010 with one 2012 addition. Since then, the author’s capabilities have developed extensively, and he intends to rewrite his 2009-2010 treatise using proper quotation formatting, yet life’s unpredictable—such undertakings may not occur.
Steven’s WordPress Blog exists to improve writing abilities and freely share interpretations—it should remain operational if no longer maintained.
Thanks for exposing big lies from big liars. I am always rereading your work.
Thanks for checking in.
The people who don’t intentionally deceive but repeat misinformation are worth considering.
Deliberate liars become distinguishable when such charlatans claim Jesus Christ and Archangel Michael visited their office. I wouldn’t associate with those types to avoid identification with them; nevertheless, infiltrators like “Professor Truth” have no complications with these clowns, nor with “Eli James”—the date-setter who prophesied the world’s end in 2012. (Anyone befriending those fraudsters is suspicious.)
William Finck also lies about several subjects and assumes himself superior, although he’s inferior—I’m not the only one who suspects he has sinister woodpile secrets.
Do you have an explanation of who the “Wicked One” is referring to in 1 John 3:12? Just curious about your interpretation of it.
As always, love and praise Christ! =)
The “wicked one” 1st John mentions is Cain, as this verse utilizes a third-person singular pronoun—unrighteous humankind constitutes the wicked one, just like the adversary refers to adversarial entities. Cain murdered Abel not because an unholy “fallen angel” sired him but due to the wickedness that springs forth in men.
Fellows needn’t be an Edomite to develop into a satan—the same applies to that “wicked one” (the sinful self).
Murder (criminal homicide) bedeviled Cain’s mind, and he committed this dastardly act—Esau, another White bloke, had these evil thoughts yet didn’t commit the crime. “Men’s” hearts reference pure-blooded Adamites like Cain, although descending from the “good seed” doesn’t automatically make anyone “good”—God’s people are sinners who require a Savior. Through defeating the before-listed iniquities, wrongdoers conquer the sinfulness within themselves.
The serpent sex story comprises a massive contradiction and cannot be accurate; accordingly, viewing “of that wicked one” as the biological offspring of “Satan”—a mere title many possess—equals a misunderstanding or blatant deception, making alternative interpretations necessary.
Folks must crucify the shameful “old man” to overcome the wicked one, which isn’t a supernatural entity named Lucifer but the inner being.
The Lord called His people Israel an “evil” seed not because a demonic entity sired them—it was a moral issue.
Israelites were a “generation of vipers” in Esaias’ day, and the “the Devil” didn’t spawn the Pharisees and Sadducees in the Garden of Eden:
Paul was a Pharisee, and his non-figurative “generation” was of pure Israelite stock:
Sorry for the late reply, but as always, thanks for an in-depth explanation!
That specific verse is commonly used by the seedliners in an attempt to support their Edomite-“inspired” interpretation of the Bible, but I can only hope that soon enough, they will understand they have been deceived by (((Satan))).
As always, love Fredrik: )
BTW Steven, how do you interpret Genesis 3? I would love to hear your interpretation.:P
Mark Downey’s interpretation is quite interesting by equating the “Serpent” with evil thoughts… I had never thought about that before until I recently found it on his website.
As always, love and praise The Lord Jesus Christ.
Fredrik.
Bald-faced liars contradict this angel’s interpretation of Jesus’ name, which means neither Ya saves, Yah saves, nor Yahavah saves, but “he shall save,” and thus shall “save His people from their sins.”
Yahwists wouldn’t misinterpret YSWH (H3442) with a proper “Hebrew” education, yet pride prevents admission that YHWSHW (H3091) is a fabrication—Yahus love pseudo-knowledge and want to honor themselves, which could be their undoing. Such dupes include: “MelGibstein,” Charles Fockaert, William Finck, and assorted parrots. One difference between those conceited blokes is that Fockaert refuses to spread the spinning “water ball” Earth falsity; however, all liars perish. (Got something right, but many things wrong? Any idiot can comprehend the earth isn’t spherical—that’s common sense unless helplessly indoctrinated by this world’s foolishness.)
“Mel” might be steps above these deceivers as he presumably doesn’t obtain handouts—either way, “sacred namers” are delusional and untrustworthy, as they deny Scripture to reinforce falsehoods and egos.
Tall-tellers don’t advance God’s Kingdom, especially when propagating absolute lies and soliciting support. Gabriel made someone dumb (Luk 1:19-20) for doubting his revelation—this could be why tetragram cultists are blind and reject comprehensive evidence that exposes Yahweh’s falseness. Jesus expresses what Gabriel announced—not what uninspired geezers with video channels state; moreover, this messenger doesn’t possess a Yahwistic name because no celestial entities do.
The historical evidence and Gabriel’s elucidation are trustworthy sources—others can run their mouths, although it makes them appear foolish.
You landed some solid punches.
The following is responding to F.L on September 24, 2019, at 8:25 PM.
An excerpt from Downey’s exegesis:
Mark’s explanation sounds inaccurate, considering Adam had an impossible commandment to obey—corrupt thinking shall occur, although individuals can prevent any criminality their brains formulate. Scripture declares human minds generate iniquitous thoughts (Mar 7:21-23), and a common one is a lust for women—men generally have these desires, but avoiding unlawful fulfillment results in no wrongdoing. For Adam and Eve to break the Creator’s command, they’d understand how to violate it, suggesting that our primogenitors realized what sinful thinking was beforehand; however, those two received such evil knowledge after consuming the forbidden “fruit.”
Perceiving the narrative as physical seductions is paradoxical:
Firstly, the Bible reveals that conception transpired once Eve copulated with Adam, and she birthed Cain (Gen 4:1). Secondly, Cain—the first supposed “Jewish” scoundrel—personified a genetic mutant; nonetheless, the Lord provides conditional acceptance, and sin (law transgression) becomes applicable to the situation (Gen 4:6-7), yet, according to Christogenea, non-universal biblical laws solely pertain to Adamkind. Thirdly, instead of carnal intercourse, the Apostle Paul addressed mental beguilements (2Cor 11:2-3). Fourthly, Cain murdered Abel not because hereditary pollution (mamzerization) provoked it, but due to his unrighteousness (1Jhn 3:12). Fifthly, Adamites like Cain can devise murder and wickedness; furthermore, converts must overcome the wicked one (Mar 7:21-23; 1Jhn 2:14-17). Finally, Adam accompanies this party for either a “gang-bang” or homosexual escapades (Gen 3:6); consequently, the tall tale’s ridiculousness increases.
The serpent copulation hypothesis is preposterous; therefore, students should conclude this viper already beget offspring (pre-Adamic strangers) or that these seeds aren’t fleshly.
Holy Writ addresses seedlines of flesh and non-fleshy seeds.
Seedliners utilize their doctrine as a crutch to promote slick hatred against Jews, although racially pure Adamites are quite capable of nefariousness. Whatever ideologies formulated, believing the serpentine entity from the Garden was some otherworldly angel identified as Satan, that old dragon, the beast, and fallen archangel Lucifer is erroneous—likewise, representing this snake as non-white beastly hominids who sexually penetrated Eve is disturbing. Christians can maintain self-preserving and “racist” perspectives without ridiculous doctrines that introduce silliness and perversion.
A supplementary contradiction surfaces here since Eve supposedly suffered defilement; thus, Adam profaned his seed with this used “cum-dump.” Kikes weave naughty tales, but manifold discrepancies expose their misrepresentations.
Addendum 10/11/2019:
Genesis 4:1 teaches Adam “knew” Eve, and she conceived; however, seedliners suspect “the Devil” previously inseminated her during imagined sexual romps, and Abel was Adam’s descendant, although Cain descended from Satan. Adam would’ve already “known” Eve when the assumed group sex activities commenced, so he presumably avoided beaver and performed some filthy corn-holing while the serpent pumped sperm into her vaginal crevice—their abominable theories become stupider the harder one examines them.
Donators shouldn’t finance “serpent seed” adherents—such storytellers likely get their necessities from the government.
This article features a turd who censored Steven’s WordPress Blog (SWPB)—only insecure people with stuff to hide/protect do that. (Everyone’s free to analyze data and form conclusions without prideful individuals who pound garbage into unwary brains determining what’s inspectable.) Fredrik showed SWPB to an arrogant SOB and consequently exposed a censoring wannabe who treasures absurd sex fantasies.
This alleged Christian insists Esau’s connections with Jewry aren’t accurate, although these vampires fit prophecies, including their return to Jerusalem to rebuild the desolate places. God’s salvation is for the children of Israel, so non-Israelite genealogies are irrelevant; therefore, fighting over specifics is a distraction, which this erroneous censorer utilizes to claim Steven’s incorrectness.
The site operator parrots sacred nameology—the Father calls nobody to invented names like “Yashua.”
WTF. I forgot I commented on his site, and now the link is gone.
One thing is for certain, A LOT of misinformation exists in the so-called Israel Identity “movement.” Thank you for informing me about that deceitful charlatan.
As always, love and praise the Lord.
Fredrik.
Those who censor biblical information are contemptible. The messages at SWPB are for the saints destined to establish or reinvigorate the Lord’s Kingdom, which excludes heretics espousing absurd dogmas such as mythological entities named “Satan” that rape White women to create “serpent seeds.” Genuine saints must humble themselves and confess such beliefs constitute perverse fairy tales. (Many would rather continue lying instead of conceding incorrectness, especially spiritual types who imagine the Father bestows them with innovative insight.)
Regardless that “TheTruthNotDoctrine” (TTND) concealed SWPB, his website will emerge here for hypocrisy exposure—anyone who teaches that Cain wasn’t among Adam’s offspring isn’t truthful and spreads unsound doctrines.
Concerning Jews not comprising Edomites, no known Identity scholar accepts this; hence, either everybody else is wrong, and TTND stands correct, or the reverse is true. Not all self-styled “Jewish” critters are Esauites, although this identifier remains an adequate generalization—“Jews” descend from several mamzerized bloodlines, including Canaanites. The word “Jew”—a misleading term—tricks Christians into thinking “Jewish” bipeds are Israel/Judah, as countless Bibles incorrectly apply this terminology.
TheTruthNotDoctrine can’t refute these characteristics:
“Jews” equal a small seed, control disproportionate aspects of organized humanity, retain historical recognition for despisement, and invent the spurious term “anti-Semitism” to define such righteousness; moreover, sufficient resentment induced the expulsion of Jewry throughout history.
Jerusalem comprised a region Edom occupied with Herodian rulers—Emperor Vespasian ordered its desolation, directed by Titus’ armies.
The supernatural revelation declares Esau shall return to reconstruct the desolations, which commenced around 1948 once “Israel” materialized. Prophecies regarding Esau unveil connections with Jewry; nevertheless, this Jew-wise bloke labels fellows who realize this as “liars” and asserts Edom solely embodies Turkic hominids.
Addendum 11/24/2019:
It appears almost everyone desires distinguishing titles, e.g., “Pastor,” “Doctor,” or “Professor”—this individual, with the sobriquet “TheTruthNotDoctrine,” designates himself “Messenger” Charles and writes:
As God’s Messenger, this persona claims apostleship with absolute Truth—explaining why he won’t admit erroneousness. TTND provides truth mixed with lies, yet, as an apostle, elevates himself above lesser brethren. This character does possess some knowledge, which inflated his self-opinion. Know-it-all Charles obtained supreme revelations and isn’t still learning; thus, fallibility is impossible.
“Synagogue” is a Greek word “Jews” hijacked and applied to their assemblies. The Apostle Charles made it essential to identify the “Synagogue of Satan,” AKA “assembly of the adversary,” as Canaanite Jews and reject Esau’s relevance—he’s incorrect.
Edom has integral positions in “end-times” events, and the swarthy Islamic bipeds occupying Turkey aren’t the foremost problem.
Addendum 12/1/2019:
William Finck has annoying flaws, but Mr. Crosby takes the crown.
This Disqus argument shows Charles utilizing one shameful insult after another, which epitomizes unprofessionalism; however, such teachers are mainly accurate about the racial background of Israel’s descendants, although they make that fact appear in a negative light through personality defects.
Remain polite and informative when endeavoring to awaken the slumbering masses—if audiences become uncivil or slanderous, understand swine don’t appreciate pearls of wisdom (Mat 7:6). Scripture applies to Adamkind alone—such demographics include stiff-necked rebels, so be mindful.
TTND is additionally wrong about the assumed Canaanite woman, like most CI hotshots. Christians copy false teachings formulated by others, and when authentic interpretations dispel these falsities, misleaders disregard the corrections. In Crosby’s case, admitting inaccuracies is unlikely because he’s presumably an apostle who receives superior intelligence from God Almighty, whom he calls Yahavah.
This self-exalted “Messenger” loves altercations and calls folks identifying Jews as Edomites “liars”; however, plenteous Turkoids call themselves “Jewish,” and the Israeli state matches Esau’s return. TTND exemplifies someone who obtains some understanding and magnifies their ego.
His viewpoint suggests that Jews and Edomite Turks are Canaanites. Whether these bipeds consist of Esauites or “Canaanite Jews” is irrelevant—both comprise Canaanites and employ the ambiguous term “Jew.” To describe Jewry, Edomite is acceptable, and Obadiah’s condemnation (Oba 1:18) adds an extra punch.
Others have likewise suggested various strange ethnicities are Canaanites; the Lord God instructed His people Israel to exterminate—or at least slaughter and drive out—such vile colored races, yet their weak loving-kindness and horniness prevented the accomplishment.
Inappropriate seeds function as thorns, pricks, and vexation sources—forbidden “heathens” wouldn’t plague Jacobite populations if the Israelites obeyed God.
Characters such as Fockaert, Crosby, Finck, and Eli James assume the same Divinity, who apparently commanded Canaan’s elimination, changed Himself, and granted a Canaanite mercy with crumbs.
Jacob’s sons won’t suffer consumption; however, the defective seeds who conspired to consume God’s people shall. Alien nations of Deuteronomy—whom the Maker said to destroy—exist today; Israel will possess their assets because such creatures shall “be as though they hadn’t been.”
TheTruthNotDoctrine is self-important and cannot consider faults—this blowhard upholds sexual seduction falsehoods and “Satan” mythology since that’s critical to his apostlehood; otherwise, he couldn’t be an apostle but a mere Christian spreading erroneous doctrines. TTND censored Steven’s WordPress Blog because this Grand Messenger doesn’t want the Father’s chosen correcting him.
That Blacks and Chinese consist of Canaanites remains debatable—perhaps evidence exists, although SWPB hasn’t thoroughly researched this. Others say Canaanites were racially pure Adamites but involved in wickedness like illicit child sacrifice.
This puffed-up charlatan imagines Adam’s sodomization via “Satan” as “very likely”—seedliners insert male-on-male sodomy or “gang-bangs” into their tall tale.
Romans weren’t “White Canaanites” but mostly Semites; otherwise, Paul wouldn’t write an epistle to condemned bipeds outside the covenant. Furthermore, the 3rd beast of Daniel Chapter VII—Greece—was predominantly Israelitish.
Debating this holy apostle’s divine messages isn’t permissible.
Futurism resides within Holy Writ, notwithstanding erroneous Preterist attempts to interpret it as entirely fulfilled. Crosby falsely makes the Romans of millennia past Canaanites, and therefore can’t comprehend the correlations between Malachi 1:4 and Daniel 9:26, and how those Romans functioned as the Lord’s battle-ax to crush the Edomite-controlled and infested Jerusalem, which Malachi states Esau shall rebuild. For additional lessons in futurist applicability, see Hitler and Christian Identity, which exposes the Catholic Church’s 1,260-year reign (538-1798 AD) and their reemergence, demonstrating that prophecy continues unfulfilled.
Anyone who asserts the Kingdom of God is already here is probably on the enemy’s payroll—humanity lingers under the 4th beast kingdom, which existed in the days of Jesus as Pagan Rome and became Papal Rome in 538 AD.
This miserable toad is also incorrect about the flat Earth and won’t acknowledge that the Bible confirms humanity’s dwelling place is stationary, with barriers to contain the seas, a transparent firmament/sky, and water above that—without this protective dome, H2O would flood mankind. The Esaurians are behind the globular Earth—Charles trusts Edomite fables or is an Esauite himself.
Charles produces unique verse translations labeled “Messenger Charles Version” (MCV); this example demonstrates how Crosby mistranslates Scripture. Greek manuscripts don’t mention “Judaising mongrel dogs,” and the lady from Canaan (Mat 15:21-28) embodied a genetically spotless dog. TheTruthNotDoctrine is possibly an intentional liar—either way, his nickname should be DoctrineNotTruth or TruthMixedWithLies.
More baloney translations from TTND:
Crosby’s lies make the Judeans of Revelation the “Canaanite Serpent Seed Jews” from Shelah—this fellow is wrong about many subjects but pretends his interpretations are beyond reproach and forbids anyone to correct his haughty self. Nobody descended from any literal “serpent seed,” and the Judeans mentioned here can only be Esau-Edom:
Some scholars who understand that Israel and Judah comprise a portion of the White race speculate the mongrelized “Jews” to have spawned from Judah’s miscegenation with Bathshua. What’s known for sure is that Khazar Turks were a manifestation of Esau, and they weren’t “Jews”—Jewry converted many of them to Judaism, and intermarriages occurred; however, those Jews who introduced their religion to the Khazarians could have also had the blood of Esau coursing through their veins.
TTND squabbles over minor technicalities and argues that Edomite Turks aren’t “Jews” but converts to the “Jewish” cult called Judaism; nevertheless, “Jew” comprises a fraudulent word, which both Canaanite-Edomites and Canaanites from Bathshua utilize. Turks are Esauites, and many so-called “Jews” possess Turkoid blood; consequently, these “Jews” comprise portions of Edom.
Neither Israelites nor Judahites are “Jews”—those using that bastardized word to classify themselves aren’t Jacob’s unmixed progeny unless Jewish by religion only with an uncorrupted Caucasoid pedigree.
Crosby employs deceptive phrases such as “Rothschild Beast Power of Revelation” to make these merchants the top-level schemers, although they rest lower down the totem pole. This British Israel adherent thinks the Queen of England is something other than a Khazarian Edomite of Black Nobility lineage—TTND defends the Esaurians.
TheTruthNotDoctrine is a probable Edomite based upon his Anglo-Israelism perspective and tare-like attitude—he understands Edomites are Turks yet disacknowledges that significant portions of the Khazar population weren’t swarthy a millennia ago and married into royalty, which infected the English throne since 1066.
Any ideas what happened to the Mel Gibstein website? It seems to have been ‘shoa’d. I have asked the TheTruthNotDoctrine website the same question but he seemed to have “wiped” my question; that’s fair enough as that’s his prerogative.
Thank you in advance.
God bless you and yours.
I know little about him other than his name is supposedly Rick, and he resides in Florida.
In regards to “MelGibstein’s” cyber antagonist: “Mel” possibly threatened to murder this accuser by declaring that he might have to “put him down,” which seemed a bit cocky.
https://melgibsteinthejewfag.wordpress.com/
That’s his on-line harassment “buddy”—perhaps he knows something. I wonder what else happened—maybe he became unstable. I linked to his website and can still utilize it with the WayBackMachine.
God bless—thanks for commenting.
Thank you for your prompt response and the links. I have been intermittently perusing your site and you have some very rich articles (on Christianity) indeed.
God bless you and yours.
You’re welcome.
It appears you composed a post and suspected it didn’t go through, but the duplicate shall remain—they have slight differences. My current settings send WordPress comment notifications via e-mail, and I usually notice them within 24 hours.
Hey Truthwillout, ol’ Melsky was (still) using GAB/dissenter if you still miss his great perspective, if you like: https://dissenter.com/user/fenius I’m a mongrel, but still enjoy his stuff and the stuff you guys used to add in the Comments section. I knew when he said “we got to find a new place for discussion” that I should’ve started copying most of the posts/comments. It’s funny that Euro-Folk boy hinted at his GAB I.D. in on the comments he left to Mel. That’s the only reason I was able to somehow locate him last year. I also lost the ability to re-watch his videos/library on YouTube since typing “RichardM” never produced his “channel.” Would love to see a debate between Stevie & Mel-mel, though. The Phoenician thing interests me.
Thank you for your prompt response.
I have been intermittently perusing your site/blog and it has excellent Biblical explanations/teachings, much like the Mel Gibstein blog. God bless you and yours.
I discovered MelGibstein’s recently created Twitter account and sent greetings.
Man, I hate when Muhammadans larp…
Anyhow, this is Amazing!! Thank you for your hard work, brother. I have contacted you via email with some questions.
God bless you.
Non-scriptural quotes contain the contents of Dante’s e-mails—Steven suggested a public audience so everybody could enjoy potential clarifications.
My positions are relatively straightforward in the comment sections of this blog entry and Hitler and Christian Identity.
Which text have you referenced, Enoch or perhaps the Book of Giants? Such literature is comparable to Paul Bunyan and Jack and the Beanstalk—scrutinizing fairy tales for credible revelations is unwise. Enoch—discovered amidst those scrolls—contradicts Holy Writ, and tremendous date discrepancies occur between the penmanship of various Enochian chapters. Whoever hid the DSS relished pseudepigrapha—Steven’s WordPress Blog (SWPB) conclusively documented that Michael isn’t a “presence” standing before “the Lord of Spirits,” but our Lord Jesus Christ, the Archangel. Therefore, the DSS scribes didn’t maintain an unblemished religion, but one loaded with pseudo-scriptures, and—if the “Four Letters” purported to reside on those fragmented scrolls are genuine—the tetragrammaton. The oldest manuscripts are in Greek, and “Hebrew” scrolls—which most Dead Sea Scrolls comprise—aren’t trustworthy; Jewry possesses historical attachments to “Hebrew” (Babylonian-Aramaic), and they composed the Masoretic Text, which utilizes the identical language of the DSS.
The Shapira Strips—that Moses Shapira, a Jewish swindler, forged—confirms that kikes fabricate “ancient” Hebrew texts and interpolate Yahwistic tetragrams while manufacturing these documents, like this particular “Dead Sea Scroll” fraudulence.
I’ve distanced myself from CI and, with “Sergeant” Bill’s previous run-in with the FBI and subsequent federal prison time, have certain suspicions. Anyone intelligent mentions this because, no matter if felons are sincere, questionable backgrounds and past connections with criminality always make convicts suspect. Besides race, Finck is without excuses for unlawful and violent police behavior, especially with the system we’re under and personal blindness factors (upon incarceration, Bill was a biblically illiterate Catholic). Contenders wishing to compose counter-arguments may challenge me; however, what’s to debate that’s open to different interpretations?
For starters, that Jesus personifies the Chief Messenger remains indisputable, and, in multiple instances, Hitler amounts to a pseudo-prophet. Next, pure-bloodedness is an attribute of the “Canaanite woman,” and Cain; otherwise, all-inclusiveness (universalism) emerges amongst biblical accounts. Our faith accommodates mamzers if the mother encountered in Matthew wasn’t an Israelite of Greek ancestry; moreover, the Savior becomes Master of mongrels. The Sovereign God grants unnatural consequences of miscegenation conditional acceptance if Cain wasn’t entirely Adamic, although every plant not sown by the Creator shall perish (Mat 15:13; Hos 5:7; Rev 2:23); additionally, the controversial serpent seed hypothesis introduces weird perversions, whereby White kindred spring from a contaminated mud shark’s uterus. As for YHWH, early Christians didn’t utilize this name, and archaeological data exposes substantial paganism and idolatry associated with these consonants; furthermore, the appropriate name appears within the New Testament through Gabriel’s clarification of the non-Yahwistic name Jesus. Finally, to disagree that Revelation 17 reveals the Roman Catholic Church requires disbelievers to disregard half this chapter, and deniers improperly contextualize Scripture to make the woman from chapter 12 equivalent to the whore within 17.
These observations only scratch the surface—additional informative facts surface at SWPB, which incompetent or deceptive researchers overlook. Debatable aspects of the aforementioned subjects aren’t readily detectable—“debaters” must lie and ignore information to criticize my discoveries. Sexual narratives are contradictions that rely on overblown conjectures “Jews” teach in their Talmud, whereas the explanations presented here don’t necessitate such quackery and take Scripture for what it genuinely says about Cain’s progenitor (Adam). As confirmation of Cain’s mongrelization, seedliners highlight that Cain receives exclusion within Adam’s genealogy, but so does Abel, whom Cain slew. Genesis Chapter V excludes Cain because he wasn’t the spawner of Enos; Seth was—it traces a specific lineage and not all hominids in every paternal line.
It depends—Matthew addresses an immense pathway leading elsewhere than the kingdom and a narrow path reaching it, and some are under this judgment (Jer 11:14), where the Maker won’t hear them.
Initially, the Lord ignored the Greek female (Mar 7:25-26) as though she didn’t exist, yet following her persistent pleading, Jesus addressed this woman’s request, although the “bitch” had no rights to the Tree of Life because of her “dog” status. Murderers are also without—the Father doesn’t fulfill the desires of miscreants who murder fellow kinsmen. The Almighty cursed Cain and cast him away for murderous transgressions, and the death penalty for such criminals later became scriptural.
This quasi-quote originates from SWPB’s 2009 treatise concerning Satan, with rightful objections that celestial “angels” will accomplish our work. The logic presented here creates reasonable plans for warfare, destruction, and eventual deliverance, making doers out of Christians. The “miracle” needed is God’s grace, mass Israelite awakenings, and methods to conquer the world, which SWPB has already formulated.
One plausible viewpoint suggests that the Lord shall come/return via His manifold saints, as Obadiah 1:21 declares.
Enforcement of divine judgments belongs to these fellows, and revolutionaries require practical instructions from God’s Master Plan so His radical procedures can commence at last.
Obadiah constitutes an erroneous falsehood if non-fleshly angelic superheroes achieve this prophecy.
You’re correct—God’s Word applies exclusively towards Adamkind, not genetic mutants such as alleged half-breeds like Cain and assumed Canaanite women; hence, the Creator recognized Cain the Adamite, and the Greek/Jacobite lady from Canaan/Syro-Phoenicia, since those two possessed no ancestral contaminations.
Many Whites consist of non-Israelites—the peculiar folks descend from Jacob-Israel, who’d bless created Adamic humanoids:
Instead of non-whites, legitimate non-Israelite “families” probably constitute White Adamites/Semites with no direct kinship to Jacob.
Clifton Emahiser “critiqued” Weisman. After delving into his Special Notices to All Who Deny Two-Seedline series, I stopped once Clifton quoted the Masoretic Text to reinforce faulty propositions—Septuagint comparisons made Genesis 3:15 change altogether and invalidated his premise.
Dual Seedline Christian Identity formulates bizarre copulation dogmas but accomplishes nothing but speculation, and asserting that unprovable assumptions are absolute truth is unacceptable. Nobody must uphold their conclusions, which mamzers like Arnold Murray (part-Indian television preacher), Eli James (Jew), and Jeromy Visser (Cherokee half-caste) espouse—mamzerized bipeds appreciate these outlandish doctrines because they provide mercy, crumbs, and approval.
Such wording is inside quotation marks, i.e., written by commentators. My belief system has included the Father and His creation since the starting years of my temporal existence. Adamic races “evolved” into many unique White ethnicities with distinct characteristics; nevertheless, they possess the same primogenitors.
Thanks for stopping by, and God bless.
God bless you, Steven.
Thank you so much for taking the time to reply. Sorry if I might sound a bit aggressive at times. I do agree with most of what you have said and just to put this out there I’m not a person who looks for whatever that comforts him, I look for the truth. I do believe Israel will be saved… that’s what God promised, however, HOW MANY would be saved? I don’t know. A remnant for sure. I just don’t know. And I know that the Lord of Abraham Isaac and Jacob won’t let his people go extinct, but a LOT will perish away that’s for sure. However when it comes to Divine intervention, I do believe the Lord of Abraham Isaac and Jacob will intervene to save his people whether it is the Lord Jesus Christ returning and descending from the heavens, or as you said, a MASS Awakening of our people. Either way there are some who are… let’s say have most of the truth like me, you and a lot of other Israelites who know their true identity.
I’m looking for the truth and I tend to believe that we will NEVER have the 100% undisputed full truth before the kingdom of the Lord is established. I trust in the Lord, and I trust his plan. I know that he will never forsake his people and let them be destroyed, but there always is a remnant to be saved and from it shall a new restored Israel inherit the Kingdom of the Lord ALONE!
And I apologize for my misunderstandings regarding the quotation you’ve made on your articles that I’ve read!
May the Lord of Abraham Isaac and Jacob bless you, Steven.
Not to mention Steven, Adolf Hitler made a big mistake by seeking the help of heathens within his army and there were jews there also… the war did nothing to Germany but make it hell on earth for Germans. The Lord will deliver us. But not before a lot of damage is done, due to our own transgressions.
BTW Steven, I’ve seen some jewish devils/imposters apparently saying that Jesus Christ can’t be the messiah because he did not build the Beit Hamikdash and he did not gather the dispersed and that there is no peace and harmony. Thoughts on that? Are these things written in their damned Talmud?
And what are your thoughts on Islam and the prophecy in Daniel? That devilish universal cult is being used by jews to further destroy us. I personally think it’s a jewish invention, specially mohmet/muhammed and the insane similarities between Islam and Talmudic Judaism. What makes me go nuts is when I see some brothers/Israelites actually convert to this Devilish cult. What do you think? I’m pretty sure you’ve done research on this in the past; mind if you share some of the thoughts with us?
I understand I may sound all over the place but when I meet someone who is more knowledgeable than I am I try to get as much knowledge as I can from Him/Her. I’m not a parrot, but I seek the truth. May the Lord of Abraham Isaac And Jacob be with you Steven.
Hitler was a poser without racial cognizance that embraced chinks and nips as equals and even superiors. Adolf makes some “gratuitous successes” of miscegenation permissible, but Scripture prohibits all such adulterous instances.
Jews look for a physical temple, yet rational folks realize they’re racially adulterated; mamzers bring an abundance of false interpretations and superstitions, and that’s why teaching positions aren’t for them. I don’t remember everything the Talmud teaches, but filthy Talmudic compositions include indecent sexual fantasies from the Garden.
Presumably, you allude to Daniel 8:23-26, and this prophecy may mention Muhammad; however, significant differences exist in Septuagint translations. Several passages in Daniel are historical, so applying futurism to Daniel Chapter 8 seems unnecessary—the possibility that this passage contains futurist elements remains doubtful. The Mother of Harlots and Abominations of the Earth (Catholic Church)—which Edomites control—shares responsibility for Islam.
Along with other religions, Islam shall disappear—I only let that Muhammadan comment because he had fruitful questions and remained polite.
Thanks for the reply, Steven.
I understand where you’re coming from, and that’s not a thought Steven, that’s a fact. All those false doctrines shall perish. And yes the catholic church and the Jews are responsible for the Muhammadan doctrine. It shares incredible similarities with the Talmud and jewish merkabah mysticism. Anyhow, stay safe as rough times are upon us.
Old comment relocated:
Thanks Steven, that’s very much appreciated.
God bless you and yours.
Twitter suspended MelGibstein’s account, but he comments on the more speech-friendly Disqus platform.
Charles Fockaert amounts to a vaunter imagining himself better than he factually is—recently, his videos received the label “Project Elijah,” revealing this Yahwists’ self-delusion. Mark Downey thought likewise, but yours truly humbled him, and the bloke died of cancer; furthermore, Marky admitted nothing wrong, even after correction. God disapproves of Fockaert, who formulates no original interpretations, copies others, and incorrectly divides the Word.
This prophet needs addressing since his name emerged—Steven’s WordPress Blog (SWPB) desires no association with tall-tellers who request money while they disseminate deceits and, as crybabies, whine about personal life circumstances. Yahwistic “prophets” are aboard the train leading to destruction—financing these rascals is inadvisable.
John the Baptist fulfilled the “Elijah” prophecy—when folks believe Holy Writ mentions them, it shows signs of self-deception. (Fockaert assumes himself a prophet but circulates many inaccurate teachings, which Charlie gained from miseducators such as Eli James and Clifton Emahiser.)
Trust nobody, especially those venerating Yahweh. Among other fallacies, Fockaert comes in a phony name and approves a documented pseudo-prophet. SWPB irrefutably destroys Hitler, which Hitler lovers cannot comprehend because of intentional deceptions or puffed-up egos, which prohibit reform. Fockaert’s plight is the perfect cover story to gain trust—who’d doubt the legitimacy of a man the courts screwed over and who purportedly lives inside an old 1977 Winnebago?
Disinformation agents dominate BitChute; moreover, BC featured Charles’ face on the front page of their website before.
Addendum 8/9/2020:
Mr. Fockaert supposedly swindled a United States citizen out of $100,000 via a gold investment scam; however, the precise details are unavailable, except for what the case law provides. Potential wrongdoing occurred to provoke his first lawsuit if unjust enrichment happened as per case number DA 15–0345—beforehand, Charlie claimed a schizophrenic broad under Talmudvision influence divorced him, and the anti-White male Judicial system cheated Fockaert out of a fortune plus some adopted children, which almost led to murder. (These criminal thoughts arose, but the crime didn’t transpire since Charles, the would-be murderer, fled the USA for gook-land.)
Another allegation: He’s a gook fornicator—like Joe Imbranio—and ran additional scams, including Flee America, in which Charlie the Charlatan took funds from scared boys to help them escape the United States and dwell amongst yellows, plus one money-changer scheme, where he bought gold coins to sell at a profit.
No wonder this wannabe prophet censored my legitimate and relevant comments multiple times—Fockaert doesn’t appear entirely Israelite or even wholly Shemitic and is part Sicilian.
Non-whites and mongrels have no place teaching Scripture to Israel, so mixbloods should manifest themselves—come clean instead of concealing the facts and getting punished later. Fockaert is probably another Arnold Murray with trace amounts of alien blood—those two teach sacred nameology and serpent seed bunkum like bastards would.
Charles talks a bunch yet rarely teaches the Bible, plus his exegeses are generally invalid and unoriginal. It’s a good thing I stopped watching Fockaert’s boring uploads filled with misinterpretations—Charles’ commentators are also highly ignorant because dumb dogs, without understanding, spread their ignorance to others.
Addendum 10/17/2021:
Fockaert supports his fellow 5’2″ Asian-lover, Andrew Anglin, and says this man grasps the truth about the “Nazis,” although he sure doesn’t, just like Charles hasn’t got a clue what Hitler was—SWPB hosts the correct interpretation about Germany’s “messiah” and the National Socialists. Others exposed Anglin as an adversary who essentially declared that he wanted White people exterminated before transforming into an on-line “Aryan” persona. Neo-Nazis and those supporting Hitler are mainly establishment shills that contribute little or nothing and are so insignificant the truth wouldn’t suffer if these conmen disappeared altogether.
Charles also approves “Pastor” James Wickstrom, although that character stole wives and was another lousy teacher with a shady background—if genuinely independent and not intentionally spreading deceptions, Fockaert has limited discernment and mediocre investigative abilities. Wisdom obtained from Fockaert—who parrots falsehoods dispelled long ago—amounted to zilch.
Intellectual bums don’t fathom their Führer falling into this category, demonstrating that they aren’t God’s chosen ones—they embraced a spurious messiah and convinced others to do likewise.
Prophets worth more than a billion ($150+ million from Mein Kampf alone), whom all men speak well of, and that make prophecies which don’t transpire as prophesied, exclude the Old Testament, Gospel of Matthew, and letters of Paul from their reformed “Positive Christianity,” and fail in their purported mission are unheard of, unless counterfeit. Hitler fans are either unchosen and can’t connect easily connected dots or shills on the adversary’s payroll.
Fockaert started his YouTube channel following the $100,000 judgment against him; additionally, he spreads numerous lies, making this bighead extremely suspicious.
Charles’ chances at racial purity are definitely slim—bizarre eyebrows and other features in that photograph expose everything. Pure Adamic bloodlines are essential for Bible teachers, as Scripture bans mamzers from the Lord’s assembly (Deu 23:2).
This creep asked, “When have I ever been wrong?” At that juncture, I stopped paying attention to this puffed-up bloke who copies and disseminates various untruths from CI teachers of past and present. He brought nothing original to the table, so Fockaert is essentially a bobbing head inside of a recreational vehicle who thinks too highly of himself, and the only reason to watch this man’s videos is if folks enjoy glancing at his proud Sicilian mug parroting, in which case they might as well mute him because he parrots lies. Why this mamzer got aboard the Identity message and spread the word that “we white Europeans” are the children of Israel when he isn’t pure-blooded is strange, although that’s the norm with these CI grifters. Fockaert is attempting to squeeze his mamzerized arse into the congregation and inheritance of Jacob-Israel, while simultaneously deceiving those Israelites too daft to figure him out.
Fockaert vs. Finck could be another Eli James vs. William Finck style of trickery—Jesuits or whoever control both sides, with differing viewpoints regarding the Earth’s shape and whatnot, yet their spokesmen propagate the same damned Christian Identity lies, such as the Serpent Seed, Sacred Name, Canaanite Woman, Hitler the Hero, etc. Such craftiness allows the enemy to target larger audiences with dis-info—too great a divide and none will tolerate Globe-Earthers and vice versa, and thus circulating falsities within both camps is beneficial for narrative controllers.
Mongrels fighting amongst themselves is needless—neither possesses the authority to interpret Scripture.
This (assumed) RV-dweller advances DSCI for the flat-Earth community, while Finck influences the globe-Earth crowd; however, Israel doesn’t need any Dual-Seedline heresies, and the congregation forever excludes mamzers. Several “Identity” preachers turned out mongrelized, so this Sicilian mutt and probable Edomite isn’t surprising.
What’s different between those erroneous Jewish CI representatives and the Sicilian is that Fockaert comprehends the FE truth and utilizes this knowledge to elevate himself—beyond that, the differences are slim, and such personas all amount to liars and idolaters (Hitler) regardless of whether they agree with the flat-Earth cosmology. These deceivers prop up Hitler, but this crime will become outlawed. (Every CI clown and most White Nationalists support that fraud, which SWPB masterfully destroyed.) God’s kingdom isn’t for them, and the Father doesn’t choose such characters, or they wouldn’t love spurious messiahs and false prophets whom the chosen can identify.
Addendum 9/1/2022:
The Sicilian “prophet,” who emerged after a 100k judgment, obtains plenteous front-page publicity at BitChute, helping him spread the serpent seed lie, misplaced Hitler love, and false name of God.
William Finck’s mock website of Eli James states:
Germany’s “messiah” claimed prophethood, but his words fell to the ground, and he failed—per his own words, Mr. Finck must repudiate Adolf Hitler. CI ministers exalt that actor to the status of an archangel, but SWPB humbles him to that of a pseudo-prophet and counterfeit Christ, with irrefutable evidence to destroy their myths.
Nobody chosen by God speaks well of verifiable false prophets, meaning anyone who claims to be a prophet and approves of Hitler is either spurious or a wannabe, including Charles.
Charles spreads damnable heresies like Hitler the prophet/angel, sex parties in the Garden of Eve, a localized flood, Yahweh, and “Satan,” which refers to any adversary/opposer, be that an individual or a collective, and the sinful inner man—numerous “Satans” exist throughout the Bible and they don’t all refer to the same entity.
With the article prefixed, “satan” doesn’t become “Satan” but “the adversary” instead of “an adversary.” Imagine if dishonest biblical translators didn’t arbitrarily transliterate Satan but used the word adversary or opposer—people might begin to question who or what these adversaries are instead of fabricating a fictional supervillain and archenemy who spreads his angelic sperm around to hatch humanized hybrids of the “serpent seed.”
Translators mucked with Isaiah 14 and Ezekiel 28 to convince the masses that Satan/Lucifer exists, and incompetent teachers incorrectly contextualized them to support this myth.
It’s just pathetic and embarrassing how these “fellows” (Finck/Downey/Emahiser) behave, and now also Fockaert, really? (SMH). In all seriousness, Charles isn’t that much better in my eyes, then the before-mentioned 3 “figures.”
I personally feel most “Christian truthers” ―especially Identity “truthers”― want desperate attention by their racial kinsmen, as some sort of “Know it all” and “I’m better than you” type of personages; thus, making such “truthing folks” appear quite, or VERY annoying. Furthermore, they obviously don’t seem to understand their self-inflated opinions of themselves gives our “movement” a bad name, and “face.”
Mr. Fockaert is incorrect about copious subjects. Correcting such blowhards and acquiring zero finances in return becomes bothersome while they accumulate money through falsities.
Folks shouldn’t finance these charlatans—“it’s not meet to take the children’s bread and to cast it to dogs” (Mat 15:26).
Only nincompoops can’t understand the spuriosity of Hitler and that conjectures misrepresent our Creator’s “name”—this alleged “critical thinker” flunks both tests. Such fabulists make “the Devil” a celestial super-demon and assume Eve obtained offspring from this mythical entity; consequently, Cain allegedly inherited “devil genes,” although Eve’s sons were fully Adamic. Like the phony apostle—Charles Crosby—this assumed prophet doesn’t realize that “Satan” means adversary and numerous adversaries exist.
“Wannabes” who prop themselves up and imagine vanity deserve contempt. For instance, that braggart Joe Imbriano parades his face around the Internet, describes his operation as “the Establishment’s Worst Nightmare,” introduces prideful descriptions like “the most important video in the world” into YouTube uploads, and makes boastful declarations that his website remains the most suppressed on the Web. This sensationalist teaches nothing about Scripture in proper context and merely blathers conspiracy theories while bobbing his head inside vehicles. As a satan, this miscegenator thinks contrary to the Father and gets substantial followings with fanboys and fangirls that leave ridiculous comments like “Messenger Joe,” “Saint Joe,” “Joe the Genius,” “You’re the best, Joe,” and “Joe for President!” The clown bragged about his appearance on the Jewish Jeff Rense program; however, as several highlighted, Jeffrey is a mongrel whose activity won’t help establish the Lord’s kingdom since mamzers—including Joey’s unnatural progeny—aren’t admissible.
Upon slaying this modern-day Imbriano, the God of Israel gave Phinehas an everlasting priesthood; furthermore, assuming Joe is entirely White—a few folks suggested he’s a probable Canaanite/Edomite—America experiences curses today because such men breathe. Manifold Joe’s are rampant throughout the continent; hence, “plagues” like weaponized millimeter waves might materialize, yet this shill claims to “save lives” and constitute part of the solution when he comprises the problem. Joe-Joe amounts to another “Christian” who never graduated Scriptural kindergarten; therefore, he upholds childish beliefs in Lucifer/Satan.
Imbriano probably provides +3 or even +4 for attempts to influence “weird groups.”
According to Numbers 25, race-mixers caused epidemics, which consumed 24,000 Jacobites—if people perish from purported 5G hazards and suspicious “shots,” everybody knows who’s partly responsible (the Foolerton Informant). With assorted speculations maintained as truth, Joe seems like an insider and Alex Jones alternative who doesn’t teach the Bible and couldn’t correctly divide it if he tried.
Freemason Ron Paul – Controlled Opposition (10:03).
Joe’s YouTube displays the phrase “discover the truth,” although this man is untruthful; otherwise, the never-ending stream of praise from sheeple wouldn’t surface in the commentary section of his videos.
Addendum 2/10/2021:
Fockaert flip-flopped, became a Universalist, and now welcomes non-whites like teenage neo-Nazi Indians into the fold—perhaps this will increase popularity, with broader audiences to fleece donations. Charles eschews the racially exclusive message to avoid the subsequent negativity and rejection (Mat 5:11-12). Eli James, the jew, taught Charlie most stuff—no wonder he’s frequently wrong.
Charles cannot cease his obsessions with the Third Reich. Nazis had connections to the Knights Templar that founded Switzerland in 1291 and conducted their usual unfruitful endeavors, such as the search for fictional treasures like the Holy Grail and continued the fourth beast’s directive to “devour the whole earth and trample and destroy it” (Dan 7:23) via a scripted war with Jesuit/SMOM/Freemasonic/Vatican agents on every side. The Roman 4th beast of Daniel (6th beast of Revelation) lost power in 1798, giving way to the short-lived Napoleonic Empire (7th beast), but Revelation’s 6th beast returned under the 8th and final beast—the RCC/Holy Roman Empire revival.
Yours truly posted comments on Charles’ BitChute channel to rectify the falsehood concerning the non-Canaanite Grecian, and it appears this former Judaeo-Christian with a Scofield Reference Bible, who declares himself a “censored” author, deleted the informative information—“prophets” like Charlie and “apostles” such as Crosby don’t desire correction. Fockaert, the mamzer, can mislead his non-white congregation with tales of conditional acceptance through the Cain hybridity myth and mercy with crumbs via the Canaanite woman fallacy; however, both individuals descended from uncontaminated bloodlines. Christ declared to His disciples, “I’m not sent but unto the house of Israel,” and subsequently conversed with that Greek lady from Canaan since she was an ethnic Israelite; otherwise, Jesus contradicted himself. Classical Greeks were Caucasian, proving the identity of Jacob’s descendants.
Addendum 8/18/2021:
Seeing others question Joey is refreshing—beforehand, this narcissist deleted all comments that exposed him. This windbag promotes the “serpent seed” BS like many other fraudsters. Millions of web page views and hundreds of thousands of subscribers for a boaster who murdered his bloodline and didn’t preach the truth—the shills are having their day and obtaining most of the attention, although the path to destruction is broad, and so the fewer visitors real truthers receive, the better.
Joe, the schmuck, also removed this comment, yet not before a screenshot. This turd censors less-than-flattering commentators; thus, viewers witness pages filled with undue compliments directed towards a fornicator and adulterer who’s either scripturally unknowledgeable or repudiates the truth.
Imbriano never names Israel’s biblical enemies nor uncovers Israelite identities, and notwithstanding that infiltrators dominate CI, only those rightly dividing the Word into appropriate racial context serve the Maker—all others comprise time-wasters.
Addendum 12/5/2022:
Recording videos in an automobile to broadcast “truth” is a tactic to make pay-rolled operatives seem like ordinary and unorganized men—an assortment of such dogs infest the Internet, including Joe Imbriano, Charles Fockaert, and Richie from Boston. Not one of these characters is of pure blood from Jacob-Israel, and Charles is the worst—as a pseudo-prophet, he inserted himself into the Identity message, but this bloke shouldn’t enter the congregation nor be a teacher of the Word, and he has a sob story to sell to persuade folks to feel sorry for him, while he gets a free ride from the government and obtains extra shekels from donors. Moreover, this johnny-come-lately conned a woman out of $100,000 and then appeared on the scene. Fockaert lambasts everyone who writes anything that goes against the viewpoints he presents as a “fake namer,” as if parading his Sicilian mug around and using a real name makes him trustworthy. Fockaert is the ultimate “fake namer,” for he spews the name Yahweh out of his lying mouth.
Imbriano, the Preterist, attacked God’s Word by bashing the Old Testament, confirming he isn’t a genuine Christian nor a Bible scholar—the New Testament quotes the Old frequently. Preterism is another denomination that shall vanish.
Addendum 6/2/2024:
In this video, Fockaert insists his grandparents were Sicilians by geographical location only and racially English. Crosby, another Yahwist, also admitted that he’s an Englishman.
The evidence shows that every English sovereign since William the Conqueror (1066) was of Edomite descent through familial relations with the Khazars, and almost every Briton with predominant English ancestry descends from Edward III (1327) by 21 to 24 generations.
Charles Crosby advocates for British Israelism (BI), a religion Edomites propped up during the British Empire to steal the identity of Israelites, just as the Khazars of old had the bloody habit of murdering people and stealing their identities.
Charles Fockaert is another apparent Esaurian faker pretending to be of Israel.
It would be unsurprising if the infighting within the Christian Identity variation of BI consists of Esauites fighting amongst themselves, whether intentionally or not.
Old comment relocated:
The Tetragrammaton Deception underwent conversion to WordPress Blocks, which misplaced many images, tweaked font sizes, and de-justified text, although everything remains readable. Interfaces are entirely different now—restoring the original version will take time, but the administrator expects to spend it.
Egyptian depictions of Canaanites resemble yellow, brown, and black hominids.
Their coloring could be an attributional curse to mark them. Beforehand, “niggers” were servants, but Jews taught them Shemites (Caucasians) were “racist” and gave blackies special privileges, above-equal rights, with plenteous affirmative-action “jobs.” Negroes joined the Jewish conspiracy to destroy Western civilizations and will pay dearly—black criminality is disproportional.
Canaanite idols feature Negroidian craftsmanship.
More non-white Canaanite deities.
ChristiansForTruth (CFT) teaches that biblical “nations” are all White Adamic, including Canaan—archeological data contradicts this misinformation. Multiple CFT authors/commentators claim non-whites consist of mere beasts, yet such creatures have verbal speech capabilities; additionally, unlike non-human Animalia, Caucasoids can impregnate coloreds and produce mamzers. Varied Canaanites possibly possess whitish appearances through intermarriages into Shem’s lineage; however, others have noticeable skin color, and these tribes have “strange women” that Israelites shouldn’t espouse.
CFT desires Christians to believe this prophecy addresses White “nations” and the harmful actions fellow Semites inflicted upon Israel, as they define “nation” as White-only; hence, per their incorrect interpretations, Whites apart from Jacob-Israel are on the Almighty’s extermination agenda due to alleged damages. Canaanite nations/peoples—not White Adamites—constitute the bipeds who usually vex Israel, with whom Esau intermingled.
According to CFT, this prophetic cataclysm happened, and Edom disappeared from history.
This possession never occurred, as Canaanites are chiefly non-whites like the Chinese and Black Africans. Esauites survived the devastation of 70 AD, so Obadias continues unfulfilled.
Neither has this transpired.
ChristiansForTruth claims the Esaurians were fully White, as the wives Edom gained from Canaan were “Adamic”; nevertheless, Herod’s bust looks like he had woodpile impurities—materials used wouldn’t exhibit sufficient swarthiness. Although not pure-blooded Shemites, numerous Jews appear white—they, along with various other impostors, personify the factual anti-Semites as they mostly despise Israel and steal their identity.
Canaanites who’ve harmed Jacob shall wither, and heathenry that won’t submit to Israelite dominion will die. Canaan served Israel previously, but cotton-pickers are unnecessary with presently available technologies—machinery replaced mortal hands. Israel shall possess their possessions since they’ll become willing vassals or because the judgment contains a violent “Final Solution.”
Canaanites aren’t “animals” but non-white people and thus nations.
None will reside inside Jacobite territories—perhaps such critters can serve from afar to harvest resources, supply goods, or work in manufacturing.
Rather than perpetrating crimes, alien Hamitic races are only fit to serve Jacob. Divine judgments proclaim the heathens shall become as though they never were and wouldn’t even breathe if Ham didn’t knock up Noah’s mate.
This 14th-century stone relief from Horemheb’s tomb depicts non-white Canaanite war prisoners.
Noah’s curse upon Canaan is a probable source of these slavish tribesmen. Canaan was to become a “servant of servants” unto Shem, and Shemites subjugated non-whites countless times—Negroids harvested cotton, and the Chinese constructed railroads. Theoretically, the curse produced their complexion so that Shem could identify slaves—if Shem’s servant Canaan resembled ordinary Caucasoids, identifying them would be problematic throughout the ages. Noah’s flood annihilated all humanoids except those aboard the Ark; ergo, Noah became a race-mixer with mix-bloods and purebloods, or Noah’s curse created their bizarre racial attributes and coloration.
That’s Crosby’s—a blowhard who believes in Satan’s “serpent seed”—standpoint; Cain was Adamic, and therefore, all present-day humanity originates from Adam through the lineages of Noah and Cain. Holy Writ doesn’t name Naamah the Cainite among Noah’s spouses—this explanation requires some conjecture.
Cush and Ham, meaning black, are indicative of the skin color these tribesmen had―Identity folks can’t wrap their heads around this because of their anti-miscegenation viewpoints.
Interracial marriage prohibitions applied to Israel and weren’t applicable when Noah breathed—no law existed for Noah to violate via sexual intercourse with suspected non-white partners. So, assumptions that Noah copulated with pre-Adamic human prototypes remain conceivable—Cain did likewise, and Cain’s companions likely couldn’t show blood in their faces like Adam, whose name means to blush. Even Judah became a race-mixer with a Canaanite woman (Gen 38:2-3).
“Races of humans” must reference all humankind, including non-whites. “Our” contemporary world is profoundly corrupt—aliens participate in formerly White societies, although Jacob was to remain separate from coloreds.
Obadiah references nations who drank upon His “holy mountain” that shall vanish for wrongs done to Israel. God’s Kingdom won’t authorize other nations but crush and abolish them, and the impermissible ones aren’t Semitic but non-white. Canaan rebelled against their White overlords and joined Esau in the plundering and destruction of Jacob—the crime took place, and punishments are forthcoming.
Addendum 4/17/2021:
One non-genocidal interpretation involves abolishing foreign nations, so heathenry no longer possesses any landmasses, and everything Canaanites own will belong to Shem—non-Semitic bondsmen obey Israel. “Shall not leave the kingdom to other people” implies potential non-white survivors of the soon-approaching depopulation events won’t have sway in Israelite affairs but function to serve Semites. “Be as though they are not” because their nation-states shall encounter dissolution once Jacob takes “possession of those who took possession of them”—Israel won’t tolerate competitors but rule alone.
China Owns Us: How the Chinese Are Buying Up America
Esau is seemingly the only consumable collective Obadiah condemns, for they attempted to exterminate their brother Jacob and provoked endless bloodshed. Non-Semitic thralls are conceivably allowable, although not within Jacobite boundaries.
The hatred, assaults, murders, thefts, and rapes make it unlikely goyim shall extend their existence unless portions of their kind, who allegedly blessed Israel, endure the purges.
Amos mentions remnants of Edom and other heathens—mayhaps not every Jew and nigger shall disappear.
Heathenoids became Caucasoid-hating scourges and usurped Jacob’s authority. Heathens who descend from Japheth and Ham are bastards by default since Noah miscegenated and fathered them with pre-Adamic entities.
God Almighty spared Noah’s hypothetical mongrelized progeny; the commandment prohibiting adultery—including race-mixing—wasn’t in effect, and the Maker wanted these hybrids to survive for assorted purposes. The Bible speaks of “strange children” disobedient Israelites begot, whom the Father commanded genetic purity from to safeguard birthrights, yet besides the “kill her children with death” verse (Rev 2:23) spoken against an adulterous assemblage, laws didn’t exist to execute mamzers obtained via non-whites—they merely couldn’t enter the Lord’s congregation (Deu 23:2). The Creator planted every individual from the Ark, but the bastards Israel spawned resulted from adultery. Their destiny seems gloomy; humane procedures involve assisted suicide for mongrels that prefer euthanasia or sterilization—plus possible deportation to outside areas—for those who don’t.
The aforementioned solutions aren’t universalism—any tolerable non-Semites hold unequal rights. Whatever goys stole from Shem doesn’t matter because Jacob will possess it and acquire potentially useful laborers with plantation breathing privileges; however, non-beneficial foreigners won’t endure. The alternative path is genocidal, which would still happen with the slavery approach—not all heathens shall peacefully agree to subjugation and disenfranchisement. Exterminationist perspectives necessitate the mother from Canaan (Mat 15:21-28) to be a veritable Israelite, and Scripture declares her a Hellenis (Grecian woman).
This addition concludes alternate proposals to the complete genocide of non-Semitic mortals, which require Ham’s descendants to include non-whites, with the probability that Noah was a “Rice King” and “Oil-Driller” before regulations prevented it.
Addendum 4/24/2021:
CFT deceptively displays this sculpture of Roman Emperor Augustus as Herod. Verifiable ancient depictions of Herodian kings are nonexistent—the sculptures provided for Herod the Great on Steven’s WordPress Blog are supposedly authentic.
Slave races spring from Canaan—miscegenation between Japheth, Ham, Shem, and Canaan generated an assortment of Canaanites with contrasting skin colors. Ham sired the Cushites, an assumed non-Canaanite ebony species, and Japheth—the purported yellow-skinned biped—beget non-Canaanite Asiatics; therefore, not all blacks and yellows are of Canaan. Various dark-skinned bipeds seem less niggerish than other darkies, and that variety could be Cushite or possess trace amounts of Semitic ancestry—others are vexatious niggers, and those types are surely Canaanite.
No non-whites will continue within Jacobite borders unless under segregation and domination. Negroes are generally a taxation on Israelite nations—that’s why “there shall be no more the Canaanite in the house of the Lord of hosts” (Zec 14:21), so Israel won’t “bear the shame of the heathen anymore” (Eze 34:29). Furthermore, goy desolations can’t go unpunished, although this doesn’t mean every blackie will perish.
A CFT commentator posted this—here’s some clarification:
Noah impregnated at least one pure-blooded Adamic spouse, and their sexual union brought forth Shem, whose wife was also White; hence, non-mixed Israelite bloodlines from Shem’s lineage endure today. The hypothesis doesn’t make every Israelite—including Jesus Christ—of pre-Adamic ancestry.
This law forbidding intermarriages didn’t exist when Noah breathed. Later, Israel obtained strict interracial copulation prohibitions to preserve their inheritance.
Tobit never underwent canonization, yet many unauthenticated writings promote the anti-miscegenation theme. “Strange women” doesn’t reference Adamic Shemites but the colored variety that Jacobites can impregnate and produce what the Bible calls “strange children.” Tobit claims Noe married companions of his own kindred—as interesting as some extra-biblical literature is, this book is dubious and apocryphal; therefore, its inspiration is unreliable.
SWPB didn’t grant permission for non-Israelite Shemites to miscegenate; however, no direct command against race-mixing existed in Noah’s generation.
Noah with non-white wives—along with a Cainite near the time of the Great Deluge—and Adamic ones remains the only conceivable way that Cain’s bloodline and pre-Adamic extractions survived the catastrophic non-localized flood; moreover, archeological evidence suggests Canaanites comprise colorful races, which strengthens these conclusions. Canaan became Shem’s servant—differentiating them would become complicated if such thralls all possessed white appearances.
Exterminationalism destroys those who haven’t harmed Jacob and removes enthrallable servants. Uppity niggers and other problematics wouldn’t be an issue without Edomic agitators; nevertheless, Canaanites could have expiration dates, but that’s not entirely provable, although haters of Jacob’s unmixed White descendants shall perish. Israel won’t be superior to anyone, and none will be their slaves if the Bible mandates the absolute extermination of colorful humanoids.
Partial-flooders spread undeniable misinformation, as all hominids originated from Noah’s Ark—only Scripture deniers question the origins of non-whites.
The fragmentary writings of Melito of Sardis (A.D. 160-180)—a bishop and philosopher—might be of interest you, (if you aren’t already familiar with it). Because, “On Faith,” Melito says:
I am myself quite shocked at how much evidence exists for your Michael=Jesus thesis. And, after finding this, there can be no doubts at what the earliest Christians believed in.
As always, praise the Messiah AND Archangel Michael, love, Fredrik.
Nice discovery.
The title archangel (chief messenger) belongs to the Lord alone; however, men’s doctrines warp religionists’ minds, preventing logical thought.
Many continue with foolishness, such as the belief in a supernatural entity named Satan and his “demons” (spooks ‘n goblins), multiple archangels, sexual unions between celestial entities and humankind, sacred “Hebrew” names, a partial flood, a spherical Earth, love for pseudo-prophets/false messiahs, and improperly contexted futurism.
Early Christians didn’t reverence fabricated names like Yahweh and understood that Jesus Christ is the Archangel.
Hello, Steven, long time hearing from you. I hope everything is fine with you. I’ve noticed that both Matthew 13:39 and Revelation 14:16 reveals Jesus to be an “angel.”
We are told that “…the reapers are angels.” In other words, those performing the act of “reaping” are identified as an “angel” (in some sense) and Jesus performs the act of reaping (Revelation 14:16). Therefore, Jesus is an “angel” since Jesus performs the act of “reaping” (Matthew 13:39).
Greetings.
Another angel ordering this one “like” the “Son of man” around and revealing the time is odd; the reapers are the angels, meaning several exist.
Without interpolations, “Ancient of days” doesn’t seem to reference an alternate divinity.
Christ Jesus is the King of kings and Ruler of sovereigns (Rev 1:5)—many kings exist beside him:
The New Testament refers to Jesus as “the” Son of man:
Ezekiel and Daniel were also like unto a son of man:
This one with a man’s appearance could be anyone, including Jesus—the scribes injected Gabriel into this verse, as done with Michael (Dan 10:13).
The entity “like” a “son of man” (Rev 14:14) might not be Jesus Christ—a different messenger with a “great voice” commanding the other and declaring the times seems off. Why did the scribes/translators mention “one like the/a son of man” if this was the supreme Son of God? His kingship won’t perish because that family line will continue forever and spring forth a lineage of kings whom the Lord of lords shall rule from heaven, or this “angel” is Jesus, and mankind inhabits their heavenly bodies. The Lord is the ruler of kings, yet this world’s “royalty” has been of the line of Amalek—the son of perdition—for the longest time; humanity lingers in the age of “Satan” and “his” deceptions. The only legitimate kingdoms verifiably not of the beasts were the kings of old, such as the Israelite and Judahite monarchies, before their disbandment.
SWPB revealed the man of sin and son of perdition here and here, so the day of the Lord is near.
That message comes from Paul, whom many consider a false apostle who contradicts Christ Jesus—I haven’t scrutinized all sides of this argument, as the proposition seemed too flawed to research. It seems unusual any reaping would transpire once everyone transfigures into spiritual bodies, and unlikely the house of Jacob will be a fire to eliminate Esau if spirit beings do the work:
Will men morph into celestial “angels” and then eradicate the menace, or shall Jesus appear to slay the wicked, or will flesh men and women fulfill the prophecies through God’s help? Time will tell. The best course of action isn’t random or unorganized acts of violence but to pray about the situation, inform others when possible, prepare, and endure these dark times until the Lord’s kingdom arrives.
Obadiah provides hope that Israel shall become doers of the Word and intervene; however, many folks desire a hero/savior to accomplish everything for them. I suggest tens of thousands of them (Jud 1:14-15) under the direction of reaper messengers who can uncover the Bible’s secrets and bring about its prophecies.
Addendum 3/2/2023:
These verses confirm the “ancient of days” is an entity. Nevertheless, the wording of Daniel 7:13 in the oldest manuscripts doesn’t necessarily make this “son of man” and the “ancient of days” distinct entities—if it does, it just further indicates that this “son” couldn’t be Jesus, as the Father and Son are one, and there shall only be one Lord (Zec 14:9). Although likely true, the one like “a son of man” as the Lord Jesus is questionable—additional “sons of man” exist, and the NT discloses Christ Jesus as THE chief angel and THE son of man; moreover, an inferior “angel” instructs this “son” and reveals the harvest time.
The saints of the Highest inherit the beast empire/kingdom that Esau-Amalek controls after “saviors” vanquish these foes, whether the “doers” are supernatural, human, or both.
Upon the Lord’s assumed physical return, He will destroy people supporting “Satan” and whoever hates the truth—the Almighty wants His saints to establish the judgments and get a fire started, or He shall smite the earth grievously (Mal 4:6).
CFT’s assumptions that Canaanites were white and Edom comprised racially unsullied Adamites who vanished from history via prophetic fulfillment are disprovable—ChristiansForTruth even employs false busts of Herod the Edomite to strengthen their erroneous viewpoints. Edomites are Turks and Judaic Ashkenazim, such as Michael Chertoff and Benjamin Netanyahu—a 33° Freemason mixed with Sephardic blood—and historically employed the double-headed eagle that Freemasonry’s Scottish Rite and Roman aristocratic families like the Pallavicinis use.
That Freemasonry is a Jewish organization equals a half-truth—that organization is Edomic, and not all Edomites are Jews.
The main entrance to the Freemasonic United Grand Lodge of England displays the “Jewish” star.
CFT doesn’t teach or acknowledge flat-Earth (FE) and utilizes the term “planet”—countless folks can’t advance FE, and those characters regularly operate as controlled opposition and take verboten oaths. One cannot be Christian and a Globe-Earther; likewise, Masonry (consisting of FE-haters) isn’t compatible with Christianity.
(Addendum 6/25/25: CFT now accepts the biblical FE position, easing some doubts about their operation. Props to them for allowing SWPB’s author to comment twice on their website, located here.)
Les Visible—an “anti-Semitic” blogger previously endorsed by Jeff Rense—banishes FE commentators and promotes CFT on the front pages of his websites. Flat-Earthers destroyed the Globe-Earthers, and the Bible is flat-Earth friendly—only idiots, the unlearned, occultists, the willfully ignorant, and oppositional forces tolerate spherical-Earth falsities, outer space, planetary science, and assorted astrological bunkum. Astrology is pseudoscience, and “planets” are wandering stars with unique colors designed by the Father of Lights (Jam 1:17). FE separates real truth-tellers from the shills and unwashed masses.
Visible espouses the “Israel did 9/11” half-truth, and although the Israelis had involvement, the same devils responsible for the COVID-19 farce—the Vatican and Black Nobility—orchestrated 9/11. The sun-worshiping Babylonian mystery religion known as Roman Catholicism also abhors flat-Earth realities—“planets” originate from Babylon.
Addendum 3/8/2022:
An official Order of the Rosy Cross symbol with the tetragrammaton.
Anybody advertised by or connected to Jeffery Rense the Jew shill—whether formerly or not—is suspicious. Les Visible as a secret society member wouldn’t be surprising and explains his antipathy towards Flat-Earthers—this poet claimed he’s only “spiritually” a Rosicrucian. ChristiansForTruth is probably also a Masonic counterintelligence operation, which Visible endorses—CFT spreads refuted theories that Esau is no more, doesn’t defend FE, and asserts the Kingdom of God existed for millennia via the European monarchies, which the Papacy regulated.
However, Daniel’s 4th beast (Roman Empire) never perished but became Roman Catholicism (Papal Rome). “Royalties” and “nobilities” include malefactors and Edomic usurpers—many “truthers” name the “Jew” yet fail to expose the “royals” and other “rich” men. CFT essentially gives Edom credit for God’s Kingdom while claiming Esauites don’t exist anymore, and their posters and commentators write in admiration of men such as George Washington, George S. Patton, Robert E. Lee, and Henry Ford without stating these characters were Esaurian Freemasons.
That comes after the fourth beast’s downfall, which never truly occurred—neither has Obadiah’s prophecy involving Edom’s eradication and God’s Kingdom (Oba 1:21).
Edom runs these satanic societies. Visible’s site(s) are anti-FE and thus anti-truth, like ChristiansForTruth—an apparent dis-info program propped up to mislead the Lord’s holy (separate) ones.
Scripture highlights that those “clubs” bring forth evil, and legitimate believers don’t swear prohibited oaths. Only “oathed” Master Masons may join the Societas Rosicruciana, an order run by Rome’s Orsini crime family—genuine Christians don’t participate in these “social organizations.”
Esaurian secret societies love the Edomic tetragram.
Hmm, I would like a mechanism to propose flat-Earth theory. Bill Gaede criticizes quantum mechanics & general relativity as mathemagics…….but he does not understand how “FE” promoters explain “gravity.” Based on your last post, I think you have a different take than the establishment FE folks. Good insight on language, though. https://youtu.be/i3ziFIsxH-Q?t=1802
Seven points about the flat Earth:
(1) “Outer space” is fictional—Jesuit/Masonic “space” agencies fake everything for filthy lucre and mind control; (2) the moon, sun, stars, and “planets” aren’t terra firma landing places; (3) H2O lurks above the sky—a protective dome prevents water from flooding mankind; (4) ice barriers surround and encompass the seas; (5) Satan despises FE, and Masons can’t support it, even if they comprehend this truth; (6) individuals often lose jobs, associates, money, and friends over it; (7) the “Flat Earth Society” are shills.
Steven’s WordPress Blog supports the biblical flat-Earth positions—non-believers who yap about FE are untrustworthy. It took several months for SWPB to fully accept the reality of the realm earthlings inhabit and place all the pieces together—following this awakening, FE-deniers stand out like a sore thumb, making them markable as probable infiltrators under blood vows, greedy dogs, or miseducated and unresearched. Clowns with no alternative choices number amongst those scorning and smearing Flat-Earthers.
This scientifically and practically correct map circa 1892 remains humanity’s most accurate (click here to enlarge).
How solstices work on the flat-Earth (10:38).
Observe this MP4 recording to discover how it works and why the North Pole has seasons of continuous sunlight and never-ending darkness.
The globe-Earth is part of the massive deception—this lie reinforces a plethora of additional fallacies.
Posts A, B, C, D, and E contain information regarding the flat Earth—besides that, conduct your own research. BitChute is a fishy platform, which disinformation artists populate; nevertheless, BC hosts content YouTube won’t. Fellows with the time can wade through thousands of uploads about FE, both pro and anti, although that’s needless—the Good Book and logic prove flat-Earth.
Most BitChute content providers are shills and imbeciles making a buck—many “truthers” there are pussies who censor or hate the real ones. At least 50% of the BC commentators must be agents writing drivel for a living, including the ones who bash and accuse Jews with great frequency. Very few people are genuinely exposing the system―hollering only about “duh Jews” doesn’t cut it.
Concerning the Flat Earth Society:
See this BitChute upload featuring William Finck’s foul-mouthed buddy slandering Fockaert. Charlie is another bad teacher circulating copious errors, but Christogenian bullies lack class—no honest Christian behaves like this. His incorrectness about FE and the JFK assassination makes him appear even dumber.
Exterminationists exhibit poor character and maintain numerous falsities they refuse to redress; moreover, Finck teamed with all the wrong buddies, including a Scottish Rite Freemason. Masonry consists of a satanic fraternity, so Finkelstein must be up to no good.
SWPB isn’t entirely genocidal yet advocates the destruction of many whites and non-whites and for mongrels worthy enough to breathe to undergo sterilization—they can live the remainder of their lives but won’t preserve illegitimate bloodlines. Rather than fulfill their purpose as servants, heathens work against Whites, promote themselves, steal the White man’s technology, and hate Whitey—Jewish meddling assisted this rebellion, although coloreds have tremendous guilt.
Chris Kazaam’s kind shall experience ethnic cleansing, but mercifully, with plenty to look forward to assuming they comply with the rules—mamzers refusing these lenient proposals show contempt for the God of Heaven and will crumble prematurely. That amounts to extermination, yet mamzeroids shouldn’t exist—the Creator shall uproot what He didn’t plant, including children born from interracial copulation, and specifically mixblood Israelites. Half-castes allowed to continue their existence should welcome this with gladness and understand they accomplish the Lord’s work through delayed self-termination. Such procedures reduce the worldwide population over time—that’s always beneficial.
Intelligent depopulationists don’t require dumb hoaxes like COVID to trick people into suicide or infertility—the methods presented at Steven’s WordPress Blog accomplish the necessary actions without the idiotic subterfuges of incompetent turd-brains.
The before-listed video addresses 4ntioch’s doubts. This comment originates from a Christogenian who’s either a Mason or never properly researched flat-Earth; otherwise, he wouldn’t make uninformed statements and call enlightened Flat-Earthers “moronic.” Ball-Earthers comprise lamers, defeated simpletons, and professional liars—the Identity variety had their minds polluted with genuinely stupid and debunked DSCI untruths.
How solstices work on the flat-Earth (10:38).
Time Zones on Gleason’s Flat Earth Map (0:36).
Even the map says it’s the sun that moves in a circuit (6:17).
Flat-Earth is an excellent method to identify Satan’s agents—they shun it for various reasons, like sinister oaths. 4ntioch’s drivel has undergone thorough refutation with plenteous documentation. The spherical Earth discredits our Maker and His Word, so anyone latching onto that crud is apostate.
Globetards loveth and maketh lies—no excuses remain to uphold this grand delusion as the evidence is overwhelming. Flat Earth constitutes a salvational issue; the globers practice deceit and love falsehoods.
The Lord God hates Ball-Earthers and considers them an abomination, for the ball-Earth opens the gateway to manifold deceptions. Consider this when encountering Internet trolls who slander, despise, and ridicule Flat-Earthers—these haters are mostly shilling SOBs and Freemasons.
The moon reveals the Almighty’s primordial level plane Earth formations—see here.
Revisement of the comments for The Tetragrammaton Deception (TTD) is now complete, and previous blog entries—besides the initial post and TTD—obtained the appropriate review, with some minor editorial activity. Commentators might notice portions of their text altered, which received editing to correct grammar—overall, it remains the same.
Next for Steven’s WordPress Blog (SWPB) is to rewrite TTD (last touched in early 2019) and then revise Satan’s True Identity Revealed from 2009—that could take a while, yet the door’s open for this long-awaited endeavor. Time could be running out for Steven’s blogging activities; therefore, concentrated efforts to finalize SWPB shall commence, with results expected by this year’s end.
Various search engines that indexed SWPB now censor it, including DuckDuckGo—Steven struck some “Illuminati” nerves in recent posts. Irrelevant motormouths like Imbriano continue uncensored, although that adulterer and liar, who presents himself as a righteous man amongst a sea of sinners, declares his website(s) the most suppressed in the world. Moreover, YouTube permits him to utilize their network, with 123+ thousand subscribers, and every popular search engine reveals his “work.” SWPB is probably the most withheld site and gets 0.01%—or less—of the attention that Fullerton’s informer receives, with revelatory content infinitely more valuable than that “saint’s” blabber.
SWPB cannot even persist on “Identity” channels—for instance, that pretended prophet and “censored author,” Fockaert, scrubbed Steven’s corrective and polite remarks multiple times, and the assumed apostle, Crosby, concealed SWPB, citing inaccuracies about Edom as the reason. Contrarily, SWPB unlocks the secret behind Esau’s identity, while characters like Fockaert and Crosby spread untruths and half-truths. Fockaert says Esau-Edom embodies modern Jewry and employs bogus quotes from the Jewish Encyclopedia and other dubious sources to prove points, and Crosby claims Edomites comprise the modern-day swarthy Islamic Turks. However, demographics changed, and the earliest Turkoids were white redheads who married into royalty, polluting the English throne since 1066—Crosby adheres to British-Israelism and is supposedly never wrong, so the chances of that blowhard repenting and accepting the revelations found at SWPB are slim. (Like Fockaert, that bloke can’t handle correction and responds condescendingly to any reproof showing his haughty self wrong, even editing the posts of his commentators in retaliation for exposure.) Furthermore, that “Jews” consist of Esauites is only marginally true—Edomites converted to Judaism during the Khazarian Empire and intermarried with their “Jewish” converters.
That’s a fictitious quotation and nowhere encountered within this cyclopedia—Fockaert uses additional falsified quotes to uphold his standpoint, but utilizing fabrications as evidence is unacceptable.
Another doctored quote that Fockaert and company spread as authentic:
The original and unedited quotation:
The third misinformation source comes from ChristiansForTruth, which asserts Esau perished long ago via fulfilled prophecy and that Edomic monarchies constituted God’s Kingdom—all three Christian teachers either don’t disclose the whole truth regarding Edom or err entirely. SWPB uncovers the real truth that others conceal but can’t amass the audience that financed liars and wannabes obtain.
The masses don’t deserve the knowledge SWPB publishes; nevertheless, the remnant should be able to discover it without censorship thwarting them.
So the “Jewish” race (i.e., Edom) make up the Hittites, Amalekites, and Canaanites.
Wow, (((they))) truly are the definition of mix-bloods.
Jews are mongrels and outside God’s covenant with the children of Israel. Some identify these critters as Canaanites from Shelah, while others insist “Jewish” bipeds comprise Esau’s offspring—the truth is probably somewhere in the middle, i.e., a hodgepodge of mongrelized genetics.
Esauites were the former inhabitants of Turkestan—those ancient non-Jewish Turkish people established Turkey. Turkic Edomites were under pressure to convert to Christianity, Islam, or Judaism, with the latter chosen; hence, Edom had no connection to Jewry or the “Jewish” religion until their assumed mass conversion. At this juncture, mixing between Esau’s seed and the Jews (Shelahites) began, yet it wasn’t thorough; therefore, non-Jewish Khazarian Esauites endure today through various seedlines, such as the European Royal lines and hominids of predominant English descent. Not only was the English throne hijacked by Esau-Edom in 1066 AD, but like sex-crazed madmen, these Esaurian monarchs pumped out tremendous amounts of seed, vastly spreading their spoiled progeny throughout England.
The Black Nobility of Italy are among the most powerful families, and although such fiends aren’t Jews, the blood of Esau contaminates their Khazarian veins. The real controllers often use Jewry as patsies; nonetheless, depending on whether these Juden have Turkic genes, they could constitute the “lesser brethren” of Esau (the Khazars). Edom might even consider Shelahites their lesser brothers.
The 33rd Degree Masonic rich bastard, Henry Ford, used them as scapegoats in his book The International Jew: The World’s Foremost Problem—that billionaire funded Nazis and Communists and was the factual foremost problem.
By the truest definition, Edomites aren’t Jews but Khazars; moreover, Jews aren’t Esauites unless spawned via the intermarriages of red-headed Turkish devils and Canaanite Jews during the Khazarian Empire or at later dates.
That Jews are Edom is either a half-truth or, without accursed Turk ancestry, untruth—for instance, some Juden could descend from Jewish Canaanite tribes that never copulated with the Edomite Turks of millennia past.
Thanks for the fast reply!
Apparently, Herbert George Wells believed the modern day Jews were the Khazars (see link).
That’s where the confusion arises. Edomites weren’t genetic “Jews”—segments of their Idumean tribesmen became “Jews” by conversion, and many converts intermarried with Canaanite Jews during and after the “Jewish” kingdom of Khazaria; therefore, what “Jewry” comprised before this Turkic infusion wasn’t Esauites but mamzerized Shelahites who descended from Judah, the fourth son of the patriarch Jacob.
Not all Edomites are Jews, biologically or religiously, as Esau miscegenated into separate non-Jewish familial lines, who often appear entirely White—even the original Khazars had light skin, red hair, and blue eyes.
Daniel’s fourth beast—Rome—continues via the papacy; hence, the present-day world power stems from this kingdom, meaning “Jews” aren’t the foremost power, yet “Jewry” apparently interbred with Edom, and the Esaurian Rulers of Darkness plant them in elevated positions as “lesser brethren” of their NWO. Esau probably always oversaw Rome—or at least Papal Rome—in some fashion, like in America, where its citizens were primarily Israelites or Shemites, while the ruling class was secretly Edomic, with powerful forces behind U.S. presidents—and other puppets—pulling strings. Edom made their nest among the stars of Israel (Rev 12:1,3-5; Oba 1:4).
The string-pullers of despots like Napoleon, the verified Edomite, were the Papal/Black Nobility clans such as the Corsini and Pallavicini—Hitler duplicated Napoleon’s deliberate blunders and was likewise under the control of hidden Pharaonic overlords on their grand stage.
The biblical interpretation of “Jew”―a trick word―is Judaean and Judahite; mongrelized “Jews” could be Judeans geographically, although they were never Judah’s pure-blood offspring, to whom the scepter belongs (Gen 49:10).
“Jews” can refer to Canaanitish Shelahites, Shelahite-Edomites (from purported mixings), or groups “Jewish” by religion only, such as when Edom converted to Judaism during the Khazarian Empire; “Jew” doesn’t universally mean “Edomite”—portions of Esau merely adopted Jewry’s deceptive belief system, plus miscegenation between Edom and Shelah transpired.
Non-Jewish Esaurian bloodlines endure today—one such seedline originates from Leo the Khazar, the Byzantine emperor from 775 to 780 AD, who spawned progeny that became the Edomic kings and queens of Europe and England through intermarriages and conquest.
Addendum 1/10/2023:
Edomites established Turkestan and then populated Khazaria, and the Esaurian Khazars had a paganized sex-oriented religion until 740 AD with their conversion to Judaism—they became “Jews” by creed. That the Jews who converted the Khazarians were of non-Edomic seedlines, such as the Shelahites, is an assumption—just because the Khazars were bonafide Esauites doesn’t mean Edomic lineages didn’t exist elsewhere. Judah miscegenated with Bathshua, the non-white Canaanite, and produced Shelah, and Esau did likewise with Judith and Adah, the Hittites, and Aholibamah, the Hivite. The Canaanite offspring of Judah should be mostly nefarious and hostile to Jacob, like Esau’s children—the Lord instructed His people to massacre and displace the Canaanites; those they let remain would be pricks in their eyes and thorns in their sides (Num 33:55).
Christian fellowships such as ChristiansForTruth don’t fathom Noah’s family as multiracial and thus adhere to the localized flood fallacy—the Genesis 10 nations included bipeds with colorful skin, as only Noah, Shem, and Shem’s wife were White Adamic. CFT doctrine makes non-whites part of the beast/animal creation, but Caucasian men can’t impregnate animals like they can the colored races, and Israel wouldn’t be able to identify their cursed slaves if the progeny of Canaan were 100% white.
The original Hittites were descendants of Heth, one of the sons of Canaan, meaning many Edomites are likewise Canaanites.
Jews settled Khazaria, converted the Khazars to Judaism, and intermarried with them―if those Jewish bipeds weren’t Canaanite-Edomites at that time, but Canaanite-Shelahites, most of their children became Esauites.
A preliminary rewrite of this entry occurred throughout the past season of Scorpio, cutting much and revising the remainder—it wasn’t a thoroughgoing edit, which would take months, but the composer now feels more comfortable sharing it. This rework removed first and second-person pronouns, off-topic rants, and many bloated/unnecessary words and sentences, turning the former word count of 40,000—excluding quoted text—into approx. 22k, with 445 adverbs removed! Overall, the manuscript is less threatening, straight to the point, and written more like a book about a subject.
Like in other entries and comments, The Tetragrammaton Deception (TTD) had unrelated subjects—a current problem at SWPB. The reformation and application of some cut text might surface in another post.
Steven shall comment once the finalization of TTD is complete. Word recurrence analysis would make TTD shine with increased vocabulary dynamics and other inspirations—a project for another time.
Lamech the Elder, the Descendant of THE MAN ADAM had a daughter named Naamah. The other Namaah was from “Kain’s” cursed black serpent seed line to make it to this side of Noah’s flood.